What conspiracy theories are you talking about? I only found sane health information. Did you also attack asbestos and tobacco free advocates as such? Prior to their exposé as such, asbestos and tobacco were considered safe, even promoted by doctors. Dentists? When did dentists become qualified to prescribe or promote a drug that effects my entire body? http://fluoridefreesacramento.org/html/dentists_etc.html Your decades of "research" is exactly that, decades old. Many new developments & research indicate more harm than good. For Top 20 Fluoride News Stories of 2011 see http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/top-20-fluoride-news-stories-of-2011-138488989.html What agency do you work for?

So 4000+ medical & science professionals from around the world don't count? http://www.fluoridealert.org/statement-august-2007.html Dentists? When did dentists become qualified to prescribe or promote a drug that effects my entire body? http://fluoridefreesacramento.org/html/dentists_etc.html So its ok to ignore long term harm to the rest of the body - as long as fluoride "works on teeth?" http://www.fluoridealert.org/fluoride-dangers/health/index.aspx Why is it ok to permanently scar (white spots) kids teeth? (fluorosis) http://www.fluoridealert.org/health/teeth/fluorosis/mild.html When did it become acceptable to add Lead & Arsenic to our drinking water? http://fluoridefreesacramento.org/html/lead.html & http://www.fluoridealert.org/f-arsenic.htm Should kidney patients, diabetics, seniors, and babies - ‘susceptible subpopulations’ that are especially vulnerable to harm from ingested fluorides just suck it up? http://www.fluoridealert.org/press-release-4-14-11.html When did the Sacramento City Council become authorized to dispense drugs? http://fluoridefreesacramento.org/html/absurdity_of.html And finally... What's my Rx "fluoride" dosage, what's my child's dosage, is that based on my summer or winter water consumption? What's too much? http://www.fluoridealert.org/fluoride-dangers/sources-of-fluoride.aspx http://www.fluoridealert.org/health/infant/

You cannot address the eight issues can you? So which part of consuming toxic waste appeals to people? What is it about these "pro-fluoride" people that drives them out of the woodwork to attack any criticism? They don't even want to debate it publically. Are they just concerned citizens that don't like change? Are they jingoistic flag wavers defending the official story, as it has been sold/ingrained for so long? Will admitting they were lied to be so hard, so embarrassing? As they are obviously of parenting age, they have been telling children of the apparent safety of the water - all the while praying they don't swallow the fluoride toothpaste - as it will kill them. Are they dentists, paid lobbiest, or elected official? They too have been selling us on the idea of fluoridation for so long, all the while not informed of its effects on our bodies. Imagine the backlash from patients & citizens. Its like when doctors were selling cigarettes. Today we see though that smoke. What kind of person can see the absolutely no problem with adding toxic waste to drinking water? (yes - toxic waste, as testified before Congress: http://www.fluoridealert.org/testimony.htm ) and http://www.keepers-of-the-well.org/product_pdfs/Txic_wste_becomes_prduct.pdf No need for a peer-reviewed double blind study to see the truth here. Oh sure, there is a percentage of "fluoride" in it - (sodium fluoride or fluorosilicic acid) that is 85 times more toxic than the naturally occurring calcium fluoride found in some well water. Both of them contain fluoride, but they are totally different compounds. What loving parent would want deprive our children of this or cigarette smoke for that matter?

I love the "food truck" section here at Sac Press. Next we need Taco & Hot Dog stands. Listen up Sac Bee with your wackey sections like Sports and Jobs etc...

when will it connect to the airport with RT?