If Ms. Sheedy is so concerned about the infrastructure of the city and new revenues why is she blocking the sale of properties that would generate new revenues for the city? I know of one project that she effectively delayed so that the buyers were forced to look elsewhere and have now bought property that is bringing tax revenues to the county instead of the city. How much sense does this make? She wanted to wait for a business that she supports - does she not realize we are in the middle of a tremendous recession - how many people can sit around with vacant properties waiting for a client that suits her sensibilities? Sue Johnsrud