KJ made the mistake of giving attention and legitimization to the selfish "SafeGround" PAC. These professional hobos have made a career leeching from Sacramento's public services and public open spaces. Now, in gratitude they are using lawsuits and media exposure to attempt to get Sacramento taxpayers to buy them free land for a more permanent hobo camp. Who on City Council is ready to stand up to these clowns?

Interesting attitude that theft is the fault of the victim, not the perp. A perfect example of the lack of faith in local law enforcement.

Felony grand theft is a non-crime in the view of SacPD. Felony thefts of 10s of thousands of dollars will only get the poor victim a call in police report (and a chance to interact with a cranky union laborer who would rather not be bothered). Calling the police to report thefts only results in another propety value sapping on the crime map.

Odd indeed

Great work Steve to pull this together. We have to question Phylis Newton's seriousness if she can't even answer a few questions for a local news source. All the candidates provided extremely cautious responses, with little differentiation. Is there a candidate who can actually speak their mind on an issue?: On the topic of leaf piles, interesting that none noted that street pickup was mandated by voters in '77, and any changes should take the public vote into consideration. On the topic of maijuana dispensaries, all the candidates seem to stay well clear of the obvious fact that the "medical" aspect of these dispensaries is mostly a sham.