I am speaking from experience. My mother did to myself and my younger sister the exact definition of the PAS. Don't get me wrong, she loved us very much and I believe still to this day from the bottom of my heart that she acted only with the best intentions, but it was as if she felt if our father wanted to leave, then he needed to do just that, leave, us included. Perhaps this is not what is going on, but I remember when the court granted my father custody (we still had visitation with our mother) that our lives turned around for the better. Our mother never hurt us, she too was very involved in our lives, sports, ballet, school functions, but her hate for our father gave her a distorted view on what was right for us. To this day she denies any wrong doing, however through counciling, I have learned that she was wrong. My sister is currently going through a divorce and seems to be repeating the same mistakes, PAS was not thrown out as a label back then, but hopefully even in my sister's case, they will make the right choice for the children. On the site it states the child is removed for 30 days, is the mother suppose to be getting help in any way, is that what the website is for? When I viewed the blair website it was sad. SHe looks like a very happy child. IS that her father with the long hair? I hope whatever is best for the child is done. I hope if the mother and/or father were suppose to get help that they do just that. It would be sad if the mother was puting more time and energy into this donation site then the court reccomendations, if there were any. I have learned that there are two sides to every story. Do you know both?My thoughts and prayers are with this child!

Something just does not sound right. I have been around many custody cases and have never seen a child removed from a safe environment. It is mentioned that the mother is seen as a good mom, but who is to say what is underneath the surface? I cannot imagine a professional removing a child without cause, ecspecially in the manner described. If the child is victimized by the mother with the PAS (?) it would make sense why calls are not allowed. Criminals aren't allowed to call those they have violated. Were other options not available before a ruling this extreme? The child is an only child? Or the mother has three other children? Were all of them removed or are they from a seperate marriage? Are they still with the mother? To me that does not make sense.