Instead of attending a fundraiser, thrown by Steve Ayers at his Elks Tower building along with hosting by Robbie and probably more of the Sacramento 60, Netto's time would be best served getting his own situation in order.....so as not to affect his future endeavors or current employment. I remember that former head of Development Services, Bill Thomas. Collecting over $160K a year before resigning under a cloud of suspicion..packing up the U-Haul leaving his Natomas home to the bank and property taxes unpaid....and the house wasn't even underwater.

Since you asked, I'm fed up with public figures who pontificate that they want to take control municipal, state and or federal fiscal problems yet don't lead by example of putting their own "house in order" first. Claiming your IRS & Franchise tax board problems on an ID theft problem would seem to dictate someone should be focusing on cleaning that mess up, before running for a public office. How much time and turmoil did Mr. Johnson create with his misuse of Americorp funds....that he and his spokesperson maintained didn't happen? Today's date is the 17th... Here's the county's parcel viewer website and parcel number....I'll leave it to your depth of skills to check on the ownership. 031-0830-009 http://www.assessor.saccounty.net/AssessorsParcelViewerApplication/default.htm Click the link to E-Prop tax

Steve, you said "The question is whether you believe voters should be allowed to vote on reforming the charter. The current city council has said no, you shouldn't have the right to vote on it -- only they should." SacPress's Melissa Corker said after the CC meeting in February http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/63421/Charter_reform_goes_to_November_ballot_but_not_as_strong_mayor "Charter reform will be an item on the November ballot, but not in the form of a strong mayor initiative. Instead, voters will be asked if they want to elect a 15-member commission to review the city charter." "The measure would be twofold: first asking voters if they want an elected charter commission, and second, asking voters to select whom they want to serve on that commission." The council voted to ask the voters if the charter needs reforming...the council choose the charter commission approach....not the city council approach. They also didn't tell us the charter needed reforming. Stick to the facts Steve....you may rebuild some credibility...otherwise you will continue to be a liability.

District 4 is fortunate in that your screen name indicates you don't live here and won't have a vote on our representative....District 7 is fortunate to have Darrell Fong representing them....if you don't agree...too bad.

Mike, Because you're the kind of citizen that cares about his community. When you see trash laying around, discarded by some less than caring individual....you pick it up and throw in the trash. On another note, Are you still thinking about putting your name on the ballot for Charter Commission?