No Tony, pay attention here. I said UC administration gets 90% and it’s the norm. The baby boomers who got in way back in the late 70's and early 80's are now cashing in. I know a half a dozen that are doing just this at 90%. Either way Tony, 90% or 60% is unsustainable when each employee pays in around 5% of each pay check to then be supported for 10 to 15 years on this pittance of contribution. Get real man, cash out now before promises made to you are broken and you get a fraction of what you were promised. Have you seen what's going on in Greece? California will follow soon and default on union promises and pensions.

No Tony, currently that's not true. 90% pentions are common these days as lots of UC staff are retiring with them. Like I said, it's unsustainable no matter how you slice it.

Matthew, increasing fees makes it so the top heavy school administration can continue to be paid VARY well. Increased fees make it so all the retiring employees can receive 90% retirement pay plus benefits... this is unsustainable and will sink any great institution in the long run.

Leave it to the Communist to say "stopping advancing technology because, in her view, it "replaces human beings," takes jobs and "causes whole industries to shut down" when the real problem is that people in China will do the same job for 1/4 the cost of what it normally be here in the USA. Only the Communist would want people to stop advancing technology's that improve everyone’s lives. Oh, and as stated above, the Communist love Obama

Try reading the grand jury's report before defend our council Rhonda. Information was ignored for years on this subject as well as the miss use of utility monies. I can't believe you defend this behavior, this says allot about the kind of person you are.