Newest articles and comments on The Sacramento Press written by Geoff Foley

Geoff Foley on "New website focuses on Sacramento videos"

2011-12-09T19:08:36Z

I'll submit our locally-based web series Diary of a Dead Man. This sounds like a great concept.

Geoff Foley on "The Zombies Are Here"

2011-10-14T16:40:49Z

Good luck with your production, JM.

Geoff Foley on "The Zombies Are Here"

2011-10-13T16:58:52Z

I think we've met, Judy. I am also a friend of Paul and Shannon and I help Shannon with the Vampire Ball as a set designer.

Geoff Foley on "The Zombies Are Here"

2011-10-13T16:56:45Z

Thank you Isaac. I didn't think much of making locally-focused, more of an op-ed kind of piece. I might look at adding some local connection to it and re-posting it at some point.

The Zombies Are Here

2011-10-12T23:37:30Z

There is a new independent production company in town, Zombie House Pictures. Founded by Sacramentans Geoff Foley, Josh Pierson, and Lodi native Tom Presler, ZHP came together through a mutual love of horror movies and all things zombie.

Presler and Foley are also the co-founders of the non-profit organization, the Zombie Club, based in Lodi, California. The Zombie Club focuses on community outreach, charity fundraising, and yeah, all things zombie.

Zombie House Pictures is the film production arm of the Zombie Club and they're currently in production on a new web series called Diary of a Dead Man that has been shooting here in Sacramento since the beginning of September. Locations have included Shenanigans on J Street, Zen Sushi on 15th Street, and various private residences in the greater Sacramento area.

Diary of a Dead Man, which stars local actors Antonio Mears and Kirsten York Saetes, is the story of James (Mears), a recently turned zombie, and how he not only comes to terms with his new "life" but also having to leave the old one behind. The series also follows the story of one of his first victims, Mary (Saetes), as she also has to deal with her new life as a zombie. Throw into the mix a team of zombie hunters, one of which is Mary's best friend Katie, played by local actress Heidi Briseño, and the drama, and gore, won't be in short supply.

The debut webisode is slated to be released this weekend on both YouTube and on the ZHP website. The production is set for six webisodes in its first "season".

Disclosure: Geoff Foley is a founder of Zombie House Pictures and is also one of the producers of the web series Diary of a Dead Man.

Geoff Foley on "Drive 55 and thrive, apologies to KP"

2009-01-10T21:03:06Z

I don't buy into the idea that driving 55 actually saves fuel over driving at higher speeds. I have made a few trips to and from LA and traveling down I-5 I routinely drive anywhere between 75 - 95 and my own personal experience is that aside from making the non-stop trip in four hours forty-five minutes, I don't have to stop for gas. The two times I made it a point to gauge the fuel consumption at the higher speeds, one tank of gas was sufficient to make the drive from Elk Grove to downtown Hollywood, 368 miles. One time was in my 1993 Buick Regal V6 with a 16 gallon tank and the other time was in my 1997 VW Jetta four cylinder, five speed manual with a 14 gallon tank. The Jetta was the best as I didn't have to refuel until the next day. The Regal made it but I had to get gas as soon as I got off the freeway at Calvine Rd/99. For the speed... from Fresno until the Grapevine on I-5 people tend to not pay much attention to the posted 75 limit. I have been going 80 - 85 on that stretch and had people flash me to get out of the fast lane. It is an insane stretch of road when it comes to speed. Highway 80 from Sacramento to the Bay Area can rival it for sure.

Geoff Foley on "A stronger mayor for a stronger Sacramento?"

2009-01-07T04:20:57Z

Being able to read the actual proposal would be nice. On the surface I would side with a "strong" mayor. The idea of an unelected executive officer, not accountable to the people, doesn't appeal to me. I think it will provide greater accountability for the actions of the Mayor's administration. I also think that a Mayor that has a stronger position than merely ceremonial would have a stronger sense of responsibility and duty to the city.

Geoff Foley on "Looking to 2012"

2009-01-06T07:03:41Z

Those are very good questions and they would do very well in a series of articles, started from this one. Of course a simple reply here wouldn't do them justice. Thank you for your comments.

Geoff Foley on "Looking to 2012"

2009-01-05T22:52:09Z

I would say the easiest route would be the fiscally-conservative Democrat. A Republican running with a belief that a woman should be able to chose what to do with her own body wouldn't make it very far in the party. Hell, a Democrat that doesn't believe in tax-and-spend I don't think would make it very far in their party either. This is why I honestly think the time is ripe for a 3rd party candidate to start to lay the groundwork for a run in 2012.

Geoff Foley on "Looking to 2012"

2009-01-05T22:45:12Z

Stimulus. I remember when the word came out that those 'rebate' checks were going to be issued. Bush had hoped that people would go right out and spend them. He said as much. Unfortunately, many people did just that, instead of using them to start some sort of savings, or add to their existing savings. But as we see, it really didn't work. I think we ended up using ours to ease our rent payment the month after we received it. But I didn't feel bad cashing it because as a Real Estate appraiser for the 4 years prior, I had paid my fair share of income taxes lol

Looking to 2012

2009-01-04T23:36:14Z

I think the time has come for the Libertarian Party to really take to the road showing the principles that make it the party for the future.

GOP leaders are now joining the opposition to the 2nd round of bailouts, mostly fueled by the disaster of the first round with the major banks using the money for expansion rather than what it was approved for: helping ease the mortgage and credit crisis. Where were they when the money was being doled out? Where was the GOP when it was clearly evident that the same greed that brought this mess upon us was now chasing its own tail at a fevered pace?

As a Libertarian, I don't believe in the bailout to begin with. Corporate welfare should not be a function of the federal government. If a company makes bad business decisions and acts in such a way as to take advantage and bring harm, they should be left to suffer the consequences of those very decisions. If they aren't as viable as they once were, maybe it is a sign that whatever their product or service is, it just isn't what the market wants any longer. Let them suffer their fate naturally. Don't reward misguided behavior with handouts of tax-payer dollars. We've already saddled future generations with crippling debt to pay for the war on terror. At what point do we, as a nation, say enough is enough? We aren't allowed to get away with writing checks for things we can't pay for. The government should not be allowed to either. This current environment of borrowing money from foriegn nations to pay for our spending also opens us up to an uneeded security risk in the future.

While the Democratic Party does a good job building a surplus, they tend to do it with new, and higher taxes, and they won't do enough to right the ship this late in the game. They aren't that much different than the GOP juggernaut, which isn't so much of a juggernaut now, but more of a leaky row boat trying to find its way back to the dock in the fog. The way I see it, the main difference is only in who gets to pocket the money you and I earn through our hard work: either the already rich, who don't need any more, especially yours or mine; or typically the professionally poor who make a living by taking advantage of the Democratic-sponsored welfare programs. Either way, it is a redistribution of wealth that we just don't need.

For the most part, the Republican Party was rebuked around the country. The majority of Americans don't care for the constant fear mongering and and endless parade of needless US Armed Forces casualties. They're tired of being lied to. They wanted something different and they picked the charisma of what was different. I'm not saying that Obama won't be a good President. I honestly think he will do a pretty good job with what he is being given. But, I am looking to the future. If ever there was a time to see the need for a third party to come to the table, this is it.

The Libertarian Party needs to seize on this opportunity to emphasize the ideals that make it the party of the people. Low taxes. Personal freedom. Personal responsibility. Limited government. We don't believe in corporate welfare. We don't believe in government welfare. We think what happens in the privacy of one's home, between two consenting adults, is their business. We think that endless 'wars' on whatever is the hot topic of the day, is a waste of time and resources. The hypocrisy of a war on drugs needs to come to an end. To wage a 'war' where endless profits are made by the egencies involved in fighting said war, is ridiculous, and dare I say criminal. To wage a 'war' on a religious ideal, whose sole purpose is to rid the world of those who oppose it, is ridiculous. You can never win a war of ideals. You create martyrs for the opposing cause and the war continues.

Will we actually give it a try? I don't know. The LP needs its Barack Obama. Someone young enough and charismatic enough to get the message out there in front of the people. Someone who won't look at the barriers that have marginalized us as a party in the past. The time has come for a leader willing to bring us forward.

If we don't use this opportunity to our advantage, we'll continue to be the party of local political positions, who is largely overlooked every four years.

Geoff Foley on "A Funny Thing Happened at Traffic Court"

2009-01-04T22:56:24Z

What I would want to know, to extend the concept, is: is there an 'official' lapse of time that must go by for a 'California Stop' to be considered a complete stop? Because even with a California Stop, your vehicle does come to a complete stop, if only for a brief second or two. And at what point does a police officer's subjective opinion of a stop become an objective, clear, official definition of a stop?