Cat Jones comment-16241 2009-10-24T10:52:36Z 2009-10-24T10:52:36Z Aww thanks : ) Cat Jones 2009-10-24T10:52:36Z lencioni9330 comment-16174 2009-10-23T22:03:14Z 2009-10-23T22:03:14Z Well written Cat, thank you for keeping us informed on this! lencioni9330 2009-10-23T22:03:14Z uhohsammijo comment-16121 2009-10-22T23:55:20Z 2009-10-22T23:55:20Z Couldn't the extra publicity of a national conservation area also help the farming in terms of increasing the farmers' profits? The way the economy is, it's harder to get local growers' names out for the public to know, so the majority of people rely on what they've been using for years. uhohsammijo 2009-10-22T23:55:20Z Cat Jones comment-16101 2009-10-22T19:52:57Z 2009-10-22T19:52:57Z Also, as a note to anyone reading this: I meant to write "Putah and Cache creeks both wind through the area, PROVIDING greenery to the whole valley." Left out a word! How embarrassing. Cat Jones 2009-10-22T19:52:57Z Cat Jones comment-16097 2009-10-22T19:39:00Z 2009-10-22T19:39:00Z No problem! Thanks for pointing that out! Cat Jones 2009-10-22T19:39:00Z dcrain comment-16096 2009-10-22T19:34:58Z 2009-10-22T19:34:58Z I see. Thanks Cat! dcrain 2009-10-22T19:34:58Z Cat Jones comment-16093 2009-10-22T19:28:55Z 2009-10-22T19:28:55Z You mean when I said why some people oppose it? Yeah, the "national conservation area" title brings more publicity to it, which might make more people aware of the area who wouldn't otherwise have any idea. While it's great to have people be able to experience visiting beautiful places on this earth, it's also harder to maintain the land's pristine condition with more traffic. Cat Jones 2009-10-22T19:28:55Z dcrain comment-16091 2009-10-22T19:01:41Z 2009-10-22T19:01:41Z Is the idea if it's made a "national conservation area" more people would come because it's a acknowledged hiking place now? I'm not sure what you're getting at with that part of the article. Otherwise, well done. dcrain 2009-10-22T19:01:41Z