gottagrip comment-14163 2009-09-21T20:06:20Z 2009-09-21T20:06:20Z GREAT NEWS JUSTICE SEEKERS! THE CA STATE AUDIT WAS PASSED 12-0, AND IS UNDER WAY! THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALLOWING DADS LIKE THE ONE FROM THIS POOR CHILD'S TRAGIC STORY, WILL NOT BE IMMUNE ONCE THE CORRUPTION IS EXPOSED FOR WHAT IT IS, A MONEY MAKING SCHEME FOR THE PLAYERS IN SACRAMENTO FAMILY COURT, SAVING THE DAD CHILD SUPPORT AND TAKING MONEY FROM STRUGGLING MOTHERS TRYING TO SUPPORT THEIR CHILDREN WRONGFULLY TERMINATED FROM THEIR CUSTODY! WE COULD SOLVE A LARGE PORTION OF OUR BUDGET CRISIS IF JUDGES WHO REFUSE TO FOLLOW THE LAW, AND SUPPORT PEOPLE WHO ARE RUINING HEALTHY FAMILIES, GET FIRED AND SAVE OUR TAX DOLLARS (THE JUDGE IN THIS CASE MAKES $150,000 PER YEAR, WITH ONE-YEAR EXPERIENCE). THE DAD IN THIS STORY HAS THE CAPABILITY TO EARN NEARLY 6-DIGITS--YES, 6-DIGITS, BUT GUESS WHAT? THE COURT GAVE HIM A "FEE WAIVER", AND HAS YOUR TAX DOLLARS PAYING FOR HIS INVOICE REGARDING THE CHILD'S ATTORNEY! IF YOU DON'T LIKE THIS, WRITE TO PEOPLE WHO WANT TO HEAR YOUR CRY FOR HELP FOR THIS CHILD--BARBARA BOXER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. THEY CARE! PLEASE DON'T LET THIS CONTINUE, OR IT COULD BE YOU NEXT! gottagrip 2009-09-21T20:06:20Z gottagrip comment-7534 2009-05-12T17:06:06Z 2009-05-12T17:06:06Z Angela, you were right to express your comments and concerns. Your daughter and you are blessed to be out of range of the JUNK SCIENCE running rampant in Family Courts in Sacramento. Thank God for your child she was never put into the hands of these people, pretending to represent families! Keep away from the ex-husband of this poor friend of yours, he full of himself and needs to be put in his place. Good job, lady! gottagrip 2009-05-12T17:06:06Z gottagrip comment-7163 2009-05-05T17:21:42Z 2009-05-05T17:21:42Z Folks, be sure to check out the links on bringblairehome.webs.com for information on Assemblyman Beall who is dilligently working to remove this from our court system and protect the children! gottagrip 2009-05-05T17:21:42Z Terry Loff comment-7084 2009-05-03T17:40:07Z 2009-05-03T17:40:07Z This is happening to only a hand full of children, and it hasn't affected a loved one yet. However what happened to Blair affected multiples of people, families, relatives, and friends This is a cult lead by one man, Richard Gardner. We all need to speak out against unjustice, inorder to put an end to it. Court evaluators who promote this ideal are unethical, because they are in a dual relationship, not here for the child, but who pays them the most money. Yes this is about money and self prominence! They should look out for the childs best interest, and not promote junk sciience, Wikepedia.com Terry Loff 2009-05-03T17:40:07Z gottagrip comment-7047 2009-05-02T01:35:23Z 2009-05-02T01:35:23Z Excellent point, Terry Loff, you know your stuff! Your piece, "Mother Alienation" is quite touching as well as compelling. Just like in Nazi Germany, innocents were victimized, there was no logic involved. Just twisted individuals with disgusting biases. Sacramento Family Court should use proper guidelines to avoid Nazism in its system, don't you think? If a 10-minute mediation meeting with a mother who had no history of drugs, alcohol, abuse, NOTHING, then why on God's great earth would the courts hand over an innocent, child, our most precious commodity to a father who is an abuser himself??? Oh, yes, for those following this twisted tale, the father caused the child Post Traumatic Stress Disorder the LAST time he had custody, but that was simply "overlooked", as a way to prove "mother teaches child father dangerous", and SLAP, much like a yellow star in a concentration camp, this mother was LABELED with every label in the book, but with emphasis on ALIENATION!! It sure makes it look like we have yet to learn from our history....because if you don't learn from it, you are bound to repeat it!! How can so many professionals condone this type of abuse to future generations????? An 8-year old girl will never be the same after such a traumatic experience of having her entire life turned upside down, on top of her previous trauma, (PTSD), and the one the past 2 'professionals' in this case totally overlooked, a word that starts with an "A", but NOT their "A word" of choice--'alienation', but the TRUE "A WORD" THAT Blaire experienced--called ABANDONMENT, by the dad, NOT MOM!! Blaire's mom was busy doing damage control from all the horrible things dad did, while not ever making negative references about him, to Blaire or ANY MEDIATOR, just LIVING LIFE AND RAISING A DAUGHTER ON HER OWN. In this case, there has been no justice. Professionals watching this happen should step up to the plate and demand a better name for themselves. All you listening out there, call, write and email Barbara Boxer, Arnold the 'Govonator', Roger Niello, Jeorge Akagi, the Board of Behavioral Sciences. All the other important groups know about the sickness of "junk science", and the smart ones don't buy it! Why, here in the CAPITAL OF CALIFORNIA are injustices overlooked, custody terminated, families torn apart??? Why, why, why?????? Can anyone give any of us with hearts a REASON????????? gottagrip 2009-05-02T01:35:23Z Terry Loff comment-7007 2009-05-01T14:26:15Z 2009-05-01T14:26:15Z It's too bad that the childs best interest wasnt taken into consideration befor the decision was made. The little girl didn't want to live with her father. Thats why pas was presented. PAS cult members believe there is no reason behind the child alienating the parent, in this case the father. However they don't conduct investigations to find out the truth, because this would take a while. We are a quick fix-it society! However, this is child abuse, with the courts blessing. Child abuse of any form should not be tolerated! Read about the abuses going on under our noses at cincinnatipas.com, before deciding this isn't true. Terry Loff 2009-05-01T14:26:15Z gottagrip comment-6971 2009-04-30T17:23:44Z 2009-04-30T17:23:44Z This is a devestating, sad, but true story. The childs 'best interests' keep being thrown out as the courts and the dad's concerns; however, Blaire is suffering from Maternal Deprivaiton on a daily basis. The 30 days are being manipulated by the dad and the therapist he hand-picked (much like the infamous PAS promoter, JB), and all for what??? Isolating and alienating based on a biased opinion of a sick 'syndrome' is like treating this child as a scientific, horrific experiment! Let's see, after 8-1/2 years of maternal showering of love and devotion, after this young lady flourishes beautifully, with creativity and energy, we allow her dad to keep her locked away like a lab rat--not worthy of being a part of the actual household--more like a pet dog than a daughter. Let's see if we can "break her" of her love and force to live somewhere unfamiliar, and if kept long enough, maybe will forget who her mom ever was? That doesn't sound healthy! It sounds sick, twisted and criminal! What the he** are the people thinking?? Oh yeah, private mediator and mental health 'experts' and dad gain financially by this disgusting story. For the child and the mother it's not a story, but an actual, daily NIGHTMARE. So many children and adults DON'T have any mothers to love them, because NOT all have maternal instincts, or they haven't bonded. BLAIRE RUMSEY WAS BONDED SINCE BIRTH! SHE SHOULD NO BE KEPT FROM THAT BOND, A HEALTHY HAPPY MOTHER-DAUGHTER BOND IS OF UPMOST SIGNIFICANCE! It doesn't take much to realize that all 'dad' has to do is LET GO OF HIS CONTROL!! Only a selfish, self-centered 'parent' would hold a child hostage 'in the name of love.' gottagrip 2009-04-30T17:23:44Z Angelina Turner comment-5803 2009-04-09T19:39:18Z 2009-04-09T19:39:18Z Our cut off date has been Extended! This petition will present to the board of trustees on May 5. Angelina Turner 2009-04-09T19:39:18Z Debbie comment-3992 2009-02-28T02:15:24Z 2009-02-28T02:15:24Z I really enjoyed your article. I felt the anguish and emotions you felt. You brought me right into the situation, to the moment, as if I were hearing the news caster myself, and my jaw dropped right along with yours. I am so glad you checked into the story further and felt the desire to update us all, thus tying up the loose ends, so now I can really put this issue to bed. By the way, I agree it is not the landlord's responsibility to know if a tenant has died and the family should have notified the company and saved them the embarrasment. Debbie 2009-02-28T02:15:24Z Mark Forsyth comment-3349 2009-02-10T18:25:22Z 2009-02-10T18:25:22Z Angelina, I'm afraid there is no such thing. TV broadcasts especially have to offer a product that people will buy (watch) so that it's profitable for them to run the program. Unbiased reporting is difficult if not impossible to find, so what you have to do is watch and read information that originates from multiple points of view and make your own decisions. Mark Forsyth 2009-02-10T18:25:22Z John Boyer comment-3348 2009-02-10T16:15:51Z 2009-02-10T16:15:51Z Journalisms gap between ethics and the know how or technology of keeping populations rivited on things they do not understand nor can do anything about, continues to widen. I applaud Sacpress in their attempt to improve an area that has been in a ditch for so long. On the subject of improving conditions, journalism and politics are neck and neck for last place. John Boyer 2009-02-10T16:15:51Z David Watts Barton comment-3322 2009-02-09T23:12:53Z 2009-02-09T23:12:53Z You're rockin' my world, Angelina. So glad you're posting here! Keep 'em coming! David Watts Barton 2009-02-09T23:12:53Z Tony Sheppard comment-3293 2009-02-09T06:23:17Z 2009-02-09T06:23:17Z Remember the summer of shark attacks on the east coast, despite the fact that shark attacks were down and the only thing about them that was up was that it was suddenly trendy to report on them? Tony Sheppard 2009-02-09T06:23:17Z Tony Sheppard comment-3292 2009-02-09T06:21:18Z 2009-02-09T06:21:18Z The art of the follow up is long dead. Once upon a time...in a far and distant land of ethical journalism...stories would require verification and cross-referenced sources. Then a fair and significant attempt to gain corroboration carried some weight: "Person X couldn't be reached for comment" or, better "Person X declined the opportunity to comment when contacted for this story." Now we get a story that is rushed to air or print before a broadcast or print deadline and you find comments like "A call to Person X's office made late on a Sunday evening failed to elicit a response when placed two minutes before the story deadline." What a surprise. And no, this doesn't represent the equivalent of either a concerted attempt to make contact or an actual "no comment" response. Tony Sheppard 2009-02-09T06:21:18Z Brandon Weber comment-3310 2009-02-08T21:28:21Z 2009-02-08T21:28:21Z You are so right! Brandon Weber 2009-02-08T21:28:21Z Angelina Turner comment-3308 2009-02-08T20:27:45Z 2009-02-08T20:27:45Z Which news broadcasts should people turn to for unbiased newsworthly reporting? Angelina Turner 2009-02-08T20:27:45Z Mark Forsyth comment-3267 2009-02-07T19:38:41Z 2009-02-07T19:38:41Z That was great. Good job on the investigation. Much of what the TV news puts up is half reported shock value fluff like you said. I do not watch those programs either. Keep reading us and writing for us! Mark Forsyth 2009-02-07T19:38:41Z Harry Osibin comment-3235 2009-02-07T16:26:18Z 2009-02-07T16:26:18Z Nice work. Harry Osibin 2009-02-07T16:26:18Z Ben Ilfeld comment-3195 2009-02-07T07:02:12Z 2009-02-07T07:02:12Z Thank you for following up. That was a truly interesting read! Ben Ilfeld 2009-02-07T07:02:12Z