Mr. Knapp, in following this story on Sacpress for the last week or so, I've been impressed with your passion. You are clearly one of the most active members of this site and do have a number of valid opinions. What does surprise me however, is the frequency with which you offer statements as fact, that are later revealed by other posters to be completely inaccurate. Without looking back, just a couple of instances that come to mind are your assertion of capacity at Catalyst, your statement as to who the owners of Shady Lady were, your certainty of subsidy funding on the D&S project on R St, and the above remark as to the "Cougar Bar" on K St. for which construction hadn't been started. Again, these are just the false statements that come to mind without me reviewing your posts. Perhaps you should do a bit of research before you spout off. Otherwise you WILL develop that lack of credibility that one poster has already accused you of. I seem to remember you being rather outraged by that comment, but it's looking to be a fair evaluation the more I follow your posts.
Conversation about: Council chooses two teams to revamp K Street
Mr. Knapp, in following this story on Sacpress for the last week or so, I've been impressed with your passion. You are clearly one of the most active members of this site and do have a number of valid opinions. What does surprise me however, is the frequency with which you offer statements as fact, that are later revealed by other posters to be completely inaccurate. Without looking back, just a couple of instances that come to mind are your assertion of capacity at Catalyst, your statement as to who the owners of Shady Lady were, your certainty of subsidy funding on the D&S project on R St, and the above remark as to the "Cougar Bar" on K St. for which construction hadn't been started. Again, these are just the false statements that come to mind without me reviewing your posts. Perhaps you should do a bit of research before you spout off. Otherwise you WILL develop that lack of credibility that one poster has already accused you of. I seem to remember you being rather outraged by that comment, but it's looking to be a fair evaluation the more I follow your posts.