do you have a policy involving disclosure in instances where individuals write pieces about institutions or establishments they work for?

apparently, you don't like to think outside your own little neighborhood dale. a brief google search on your name turns up a news story where you are quoted opposing Old Soul's aquisition of a liquor license which i find interesting given your current support of a nightclub on k street using the tva to support your argument. in short this piece you wrote is fine as long as it is represented as an opinion piece and not a news story. you can call it narrow logic but i still don't believe you have any other examples to cite because if you did they would not only fit your argument nicely they would have also been of interest to the community.

i get your point dale i just think it's weak but if you'd rather suggest i don't understand than that's okay too. out of curiosity, do you have any examples of similar development projects in other cities built around a similar deal that were or weren't successful? i suppose bottom line i feel like this piece was slanted and poorly researched.

i'm pretty new to these forums but have noticed that mr. galt is not... just out curiosity has anyone else recognized the atlas shrugged reference already? once you make that connection galt's ravings make a little more sense. the individual over all hey john?

you're so angry it's hard to take you seriously john. i think if you cooled down for a minute you'd realize that you're arguing with people who aren't necessarily disagreeing with you. except for the liberal thing. that makes no sense. i don't know of many liberals who are pro-development. or pro city government giving money to developers. quite the opposite actually. okay, let's see what part of that you start yelling and cussing about this time...