Newest articles on The Sacramento Press tagged as "robin swanson"

Now public: Details on failed deal between city, firefighters

2009-06-27T02:57:58Z

City managers and the local firefighters’ union have widely different views of the most recent failed proposal for the firefighters’ contract. The Sacramento Press readers can join the debate by reading official memos from the recent contract proposal here.

Contract negotiations between Sacramento Area Firefighters Local 522 and city officials failed earlier this week. After the most recent deal flopped, the City Council decided to move ahead with its budget cut to fire 68 firefighters. The last day of the work for the 68 firefighters is July 2, and they will be paid through July 3, according to acting city spokeswoman Wendy Klock-Johnson. The union points out that the firefighters will be laid off prior to the Fourth of July holiday, which means there are higher public safety risks.

The two sides disagreed over the meaning of the language in the latest contract proposal. The proposal includes language referring to a 5 percent pay cut in the 2009/2010 fiscal year, a 5 percent pay raise in the 2010/2011 fiscal year and paid time off.

City officials and union representatives both agree that firefighters were willing to give up the 5 percent salary increase scheduled for next month. However, the groups are divided on how they view the language referring to a pay increase in the 2010/2011 fiscal year.

The paragraphs in the proposal that referred to the 5 percent pay raise in June 2010 were not mentioned in Local 522’s June 23 statement that was sent to media outlets. The statement sent out by Local 522 is available here.

“Effective June 19, 2010, salary ranges in terms of bi-weekly rates shall be adjusted by five (5%), and are set forth in Exhibit A-2, ” according to the proposal for the agreement.

Assistant City Manager Gus Vina contends that the proposal’s language means that firefighters were asking for a 5 percent raise that would kick in on June 19, 2010. He also raised objections to another sentence in the proposal, which states: “This agreement shall remain in full force and effect from June 20, 2009 to, and include June 19, 2010.”

By using the word “include” in the sentence, Local 522 is again saying that the raise would start on June 19, 2010, Vina says.

Local 522 spokeswoman Robin Swanson strongly disagreed with Vina’s arguments about the proposed contract language. "It’s very disappointing that they would put that out there,” Swanson said. “It’s very clear that the firefighters have been willing to give up their raise.”

Swanson also commented on the language that refers to the 5 percent salary increase in 2010. She said the language means that firefighters want to come back to the negotiating table in one year, and negotiate from the same starting point, which was a 5 percent increase.

Swanson raised concerns about public safety. “Sixty-eight firefighters laid off the day before the Fourth of July: That’s crazy,” she said.

Vina responded that the city and Local 522 have been involved in complicated negotiations for months. He said he had “absolutely no level of comfort or confidence” that there could be a successful deal to eliminate the 5 percent raise in 2010 if it was put into the contract.

Vina said the agreement would have meant the city would have to pay firefighters a 5 percent raise in 2010 while other unions receive less.

He said he had a challenge for the union: If Local 522 is honestly saying that the 5 percent raise in 2010 is “up for grabs,” why did the union put the language for the raise in the proposal?

The proposal also had language relating to time off for firefighters: “Employees will receive forty (40) hours, or fifty-six (56) hours in suppression, of paid time off on June 20, 2009.”

The Sacramento Press was able to view the proposal documents after negotiations ended between the union and city managers.

Klock-Johnson noted that materials and conversations about labor relations are confidential during the course of negotiations.

Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.

Talks go downhill for firefighters' union, city managers

2009-06-19T04:27:04Z

Labor negotiations between the firefighters’ union and the city have gone downhill fast.

The firefighters’ union, Sacramento Area Firefighters Local 522, sent out press releases to media outlets Wednesday that said the union was going to “explore legal options” in its dispute with city management.

The firefighters and city managers are engaging in controversial negotiations because city officials are planning to lay off firefighters if the union does not make concessions. Firefighter and union spokesman Chris Harvey said Tuesday that 41 firefighters may lose their jobs. The City Council approved its budget Tuesday, closing a gap of more than $43 million.

“We now must explore all legal and other options to ensure that firefighters are treated fairly in this process and public safety is protected,” Harvey said in a press release.

Responding to the union’s claim that it may examine legal options, acting city spokeswoman Wendy Klock-Johnson said that a lawsuit has not been submitted to the city. She said she couldn’t comment on a possible lawsuit until she sees it.

Details about the options the firefighters may pursue were not available at press time. Local 522 spokeswoman Robin Swanson was not immediately available for comment Thursday afternoon.

Firefighters are upset that the City Council decided Tuesday to back out of a tentative deal in which firefighters would have been paid salary increases over a five-year period. The salary increases added up to a total of 11 percent by 2014, Harvey said Tuesday. In the deal, the city offered only one year of layoff protections, he added.

The union is angered that the City Council rejected the agreement while firefighters were voting on it, according to the press release. Firefighters also note that they first learned about the city’s rejection of the deal through the media.

The union is indicating that it may fight for the agreement the city rejected Tuesday. “Firefighters are sealing the results from this election to explore legal options that would ensure that the city uphold the agreed-upon contract,” according to the statement.

Union members voted down an earlier deal with city management June 5.

Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.

Firefighters scrap labor deal with city, talks may resume

2009-06-06T02:28:42Z

The local firefighters’ union Friday scrapped a deal with city management that would have cut firefighters' salary increases and maintained jobs.

Sacramento Area Firefighters Local 522 is attributing the failure of the deal to the city’s decision to send layoff notices to firefighters earlier this week. Meanwhile, the city is saying that it was straightforward in its negotiations with the union.

The city, which is facing a deficit of more than $43 million, plans to lay off 68 people in the Sacramento Fire Department if the union does not make concessions.

Both sides said Friday that they are ready to start negotiations again. Local 522 spokesperson Robin Swanson said firefighters are willing to go back to the negotiating table and “figure this out.”

“The city needs to operate in good faith,” she said.

The city is asking for concessions from the union to help balance its budget and avoid fire department layoffs, said Gus Vina, assistant city manager. “This issue is too important for us to give up on."

Under the terms of the deal that was voted down, firefighters would have skipped their 5 percent cost-of-living increase scheduled for July. The agreement guaranteed firefighters a 1 percent pay increase in July 2010, to be followed by a 2 percent raise in 2011. Two-thirds of union members voted down the agreement Friday, Swanson said, and the deal failed with 66 percent opposed and 34 percent in support.

The union expressed anger that the city sent pink slips to firefighters after the groups forged a preliminary deal.

The union sent out a press release to media outlets Friday morning saying that more than 70 firefighters received layoff letters on Tuesday, after the union had already made the early agreement with the city and before union members started voting on it.

The city’s move "is creating all kinds of mistrust among firefighters who thought they had a deal with the city,” Swanson said before the results of the vote were announced.

The city’s decision to send the layoff notices was either meant to intimidate the firefighters or the result of “gross incompetence,” Swanson said.

But Vina said the city was clear in its negotiations with the union. The union knew layoff letters were coming, he said.

From the beginning of negotiations, “Local 522 [and] city staff knew that we were looking at a reduction of 50 firefighter positions, as part of the necessary reductions for next year if we don’t get the labor concessions,” Vina said. “They knew the letters for the layoffs were going to go out on June 1.”

City spokesperson Wendy Klock-Johnson provided numbers that differed from Swanson’s. On Monday, the city sent 68 layoff notices to firefighters and 100 layoff notices to other city staffers, according to Klock-Johnson.

Vina explained that the 68 layoffs figure includes 50 firefighters, nine engineers and nine captains. The engineers and captains have the ability to move down to firefighter positions, which would displace people in those positions.