<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title type="text">Newest articles on The Sacramento Press tagged as "confidential source"</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/tag/confidentialsource" />
  <entry>
    <title type="text">Compromise media shield law seems likely</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/16751/Compromise_media_shield_law_seems_likely" />
    <author>
      <name>Tony Sheppard</name>
    </author>
    <id>headline-16751</id>
    <updated>2009-10-31T02:25:03Z</updated>
    <published>2009-10-31T02:25:03Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;According to the Associated Press, agreement has been reached between senate, white house, and press representatives on a new version of a media shield law &amp;quot;to protect reporters from being forced to disclose their confidential sources in federal court.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In brief, it would allow the government to seek a source's identity in instances of security leaks with national security implications, the burden would be on the journalist to justify non-disclosure of source identity in criminal cases, and the burden would be on the state to justify disclosure in non-criminal cases.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of interest to Sacramento Press readers and writers, &amp;quot;The revised bill would also extend protections for freelance or citizen journalists by defining a journalist by the nature of activity engaged in rather than by the organization that employs the reporter.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Full story: &lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_media_shield" target="_blank"&gt;Yahoo News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <dc:creator>Tony Sheppard</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-10-31T02:25:03Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>


