STORYLINE Development

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Foreclosures staying off the Grid

by Suzanne Hurt, published on June 29, 2009 at 6:48 PM

Storyline: Development RSS Feed

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images

Walk through some of the region's newest neighborhoods and you'll discover hundreds upon hundreds of houses lying empty. Their owners, victims of foreclosure, have long since moved on.

While only some of those are currently on the market, you'll find it next to impossible to come upon a foreclosed home for sale in Sacramento's central city. That's because there's currently only one.

The desirability of living in the grid and of its housing stock have kept prices fairly stable and made the area nearly immune to the foreclosure crisis, unlike outlying areas of the city and fast-growing suburbs like Natomas and Elk Grove, according to local real estate agents.

"Downtown has held its value, because what we have downtown, you can't replicate in new construction areas," said David Kirrene, a real estate broker with Windermere Dunnigan Realtors.

"You've got the character of the old homes -- every house is different. You've got the tree-lined streets. And look at just how long these homes have lasted; the quality of the homes," he said. "I think with new construction areas -- you can get that in 'Any City, USA' ."

In addition, homeowners in the grid -- the area bounded by the Sacramento River on the west, the Union Pacific railroad tracks/B Street on the north, Alhambra Boulevard on the east and Broadway to the south -- are mostly more experienced, established buyers who bought their homes before this decade's new housing boom and who got fixed-rate mortgages, said Elizabeth Weintraub, an agent in Lyon Real Estate's Midtown office and a home-buying columnist for About.com.

Right now, only one foreclosed home -- a house on 25th Street in Midtown -- is currently on the market in the grid, according to Weintraub and Tabetha Holyfield, a real estate agent for Century 21 All Professional near Arden Fair Mall. That's out of 74 homes currently for sale in Midtown in the 95816 zip code and downtown in 95814 and 95811.

It's another story in the fastest-growing nearby towns. Natomas has 145 bank-owned homes for sale and Elk Grove has 139, said Weintraub. In the city, Del Paso has 44 on the market, Oak Park has 41, South Sacramento has 16 and Rosemont has seven, according to MetroList Services numbers provided by Weintraub and Holyfield.

Those numbers don't tell the whole tale. The actual number of foreclosed homes -- not just foreclosed homes on the market -- in the city and in particular, the grid, isn't kept by any government agency or a one-stop service accessible to real estate pros or consumers.

However, numbers are kept for the entire county. After a dip in foreclosures in recent months, Sacramento County is seeing a resurgence in the number of trustee's deeds filed when banks foreclose on homes. June already has 1,067, while May had 869, April had 897 and March had 919, according to figures from the Sacramento County Assessor's Office.

Before that, the monthly numbers of houses slipping out of owner's hands hadn't fallen below 1,071 (the figure for January 2009) since December 2007.

Two other problems with ferreting out the actual number of foreclosures are the "short sales" homes that are on the market to technically avoid foreclosure and all the foreclosed homes the banks are now holding back from the market, real estate agents said.

A short sale is an agreement between the homeowner and bank that allows the homeowner to avoid foreclosure. Short sales involve homeowners who need to sell either because they're undergoing hardship and can't afford the mortgage payments, or because the house is upside down and the owners owe more than the house is worth.

Banks can be negotiated with to allow owners to sell houses -- sometimes at half the price the owners paid -- if the bank gets all the money from the sale. The bank will then release the loan. These short-sale homes aren't listed as foreclosures, said Weintraub, who may be the city's top short-sales agent. She currently has 20 short-sale homes listed.

Currently, 58.6 percent in of the homes listed in Sacramento County are short sales, she said, adding, "Short sales are replacing foreclosures as the hot commodity."

In addition, banks are selling foreclosed houses in bulk at 50 cents on the dollar to investors, who turn around and list those properties at twice what they paid; yet those houses aren't advertised as foreclosures when they go back on the market.

Also, housing prices have gotten so low due to the glut of foreclosed homes that banks are not putting them on the market, real estate agents said.

"They're really controlling the market. So it's giving us a false sense of what's really going on," said Holyfield.

At the start of 2009, the number of bank-owned homes that were active real estate listings in Sacramento County and parts of nearby Yolo and Placer counties totaled 2,500. As of June 15, the number was only 909, she said.

"They're hoarding them. It's what's known as shadow inventory," Weintraub said. "Yet we all know the number of foreclosures are continually going up."

Most people who've lost their homes to foreclosure in other areas were first-time owners who bought between 2002 and 2006 in a time when home loans were too easy to get, and so the number of buyers skyrocketed. The demand inflated housing prices for both tract houses in brand-new subdivisions and lower-end houses in established neighborhoods and fueled a construction boom that created new neighborhoods.

At the same time, these people purchased with "100 percent financing," so they didn't put down any -- or at least not significant -- down payments. They also got adjustable-rate mortgages, which greatly increased their payments after the first few years.

"There were so many first-time home buyers. It didn't matter who you were. They were giving away homes like lollipops," said Holyfield.

Weintraub agreed, saying, "A lot of the people in trouble out in the suburbs are really people who never should have qualified to buy."

After the bottom fell out of the housing market, house prices plummeted and many people owed more than their houses were worth.

In the central city where there's no room for new home construction, seasoned owners have held onto their homes for a long time. The housing market has remained far more stable and prices have stayed relatively flat in comparison.

"We don't have the roller-coaster prices like we have in other areas," said Holyfield. "We didn't have those big explosions coming into Midtown, buying those properties and now selling those properties. You have established people living in the inner city, instead of having a whole neighborhood of people who just moved there in the last 10 years."

House prices never went up as high in the grid as they did in new areas, and now they've gone down only about 25 percent, contrasted with a 50- to 60-percent decrease in other areas, said Kirrene.

"I've always heard these are the first to go up in value and the last to go down in value," he said. The median sales prices of a 1600-square-foot, three-bedroom, single-family home is currently $308,000 in the grid, he said.

In 2008, 27 percent (13 out of 49) of the single-family homes sold in the 95816 zip code and 37 percent in 95814 and 95811 were foreclosures, while 70 to 80 percent of those sold in other regions were foreclosures, said Craig Dunnigan, who owns Prudential Dunnigan Real Estate.

From Dec., 27, 2008, a total of 670 foreclosed homes have sold in Elk Grove and 733 in Natomas, said Weintraub. Fifteen sold downtown and in 95816, which may include East Sacramento in this figure.

Real estate agents cited many reasons why people want to live in the central city and buy the houses that are here. Most of the homes were built before 1940. A sizable number were built before 1900. In the last six months, 20 of the active, pending and sold houses were built before 1900 and two before 1880, Kirrene said.

These homes were built better, with charm and quality craftsmanship that makes them higher-end properties. People also love being close to vibrant Midtown and downtown, with all the restaurants, shops, clubs, open park space and access to both the Sacramento and American rivers. People who work there don't want to commute, and they enjoy easy access to freeways, real estate agents said.

"People gravitate toward homes with character, and this is where people are going to find them," said Weintraub. "It's a desirable place to live."

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

edited on  June 29, 2009 | 7:35 PM
There are a few bank owned properties in Midtown but the author is correct that Midtown has largely escaped the misfortune of the housing crash. Midtown and downtown are truly unique and during the boom speculators did not 'invest' in existing Midtown properties because maintaining an older home and especially a historic home is often a labor of love and not ideal for a quick buck. We saw some decent infill as well. Midtown has changed in many ways for the better over the past 20 years because of dedicated homeowners who continue to work tirelessly to keep slumlords out and ensure our treasured historic (and non-historic) neighborhoods are maintained. It is no accident that Midtown has done relatively well and property values are still high. Now - will someone please tell our city leaders so they will stop sacrificing Midtown residential neighborhoods for sales tax revenue from alchohol sales...when Midtown tips back to what it was 20 years ago, the whole city - residents and businesses alike will suffer.
3 1
REPLY
June 29, 2009 | 9:24 PM
"someone please tell our city leaders so they will stop sacrificing Midtown residential neighborhoods for sales tax revenue from alchohol sales"

Well, midtowns changing and becoming an entrainment district, most people I know down here prefer the NEW midtown to the midtown of ten years ago when it was dead. You should be glad people wanna come and open business like bars in the grid which gets even more people to spend money down here. Ten years ago the grid was not the "cool" place to be.
3 3
REPLY
June 30, 2009 | 9:58 AM
You are so right there are a few more bank owned homes than just one in Midtown. But the auther is most likely correct that it is the only one on the market. But i have seen more than 5 just while riding my back through midtown. The way that you can tell the foreclosed homes in midtown is either by the boarded up windows or if you walk up closely to the home there will be a city notice on the front door or on one of the main front windows. But over all yes midtown is the only are in sacramento where the home prices have gone up since 2005. even if it is only by about 2.5%
0 0
REPLY
June 30, 2009 | 6:37 PM
Midtown has always been the cool place to be. 20 years ago this is where artist and students gravitated. Entertainment done right - which stays in commercially zoned areas and follows the rules generally isn't an issue - it becomes an issue when it encroaches into residential areas. Zoning maps clearly show most of Midtown is residential punctuated by a few commercial corridors. Not the other way around as bar owners and other business advocates would like everyone to believe. Midtowners like the variety of stuff to do - i too like being able to walk or take a quick cab right to a club, but the issue is that current rules aren't enforced and some areas have become a free for all. Please don't confuse the issue - it's not about stopping the activity - it's about not sacrificing one amenity - livability, for another - sales tax revenue.
2 0
REPLY
June 30, 2009 | 8:27 AM
The real estate industry is a special interest group. It funds politicians, political campaigns and generates ad revenue for news media. I wonder what real estate agents have to say now about their part in pumping up the housing bubble? Crucially, its crash is driving the deep and deepening slowdown.
0 1
REPLY
edited on  June 30, 2009 | 3:33 PM
Adam, it is important to know the history of WHY a house is boarded up and the bank repossessed a midtown house. In one case near me the two young male heirs after inheriting it from their hard working mother, took out the equity, trashed the interior and violated numerous city codes. The economy was not at fault in this case. In another case, a group of heirs located in various parts of the country (one living in Europe) could not agree on a sale price. This one became a drug haven eventually destroying its interior too and after many neighbors' complaints, tenant arrests and violations, the city boarded it up too.

Savemidtown-you are absolutely right and thanks for saying it so well.

Trapper, I would respect your comment more if I knew who you are. Please don't hide behind your handle. Maybe most people you know like it the way you describe, but a party town district is not sustainable for working people and children who live in it. There must be a balance between those folks who invest their lives and life's savings in their homes and the party/entertainment folks, the vast majority of whom do not live in the area, and too many of whom misbehave under the influence of alcohol.

Too much party/entertainment is exactly what destroyed historic Old Town Chicago and Gas Light Square in St. Louis. Check it out and you'll see what happened. Remember always that those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it. I don't think you want to see that happen here because the party goers and entertainment were the last to leave in Old Town Chicago and St. Louis after those who created the attraction left first.
3 3
REPLY
July 1, 2009 | 12:03 AM
Know who I am? Why don't you have the SacPress change the rules Dale so that everyone has to reveal them selves? Dale, if that's who you really are, why don't you ask Savemidtown to do the same? Is it because she agrees with you and I don't. Believe it or not Dale, most comment boards on the internet have comments made by people with handles, so get use to it.
3 1
REPLY
edited on  June 30, 2009 | 3:36 PM
As to the article itself, the reasons for foreclosures are significant and often ignored. Generalizations and blanket percentages, usually do not reveal those reasons. As is so often the case, "the devil is in the details." How much equity did the owner pull out when times were good is one detail?

The demand for a house in the grid and the related price usually depends on what is left of the historic features in the house and how they have been upgraded to meet today's lifestyle, while retaining the "old." This is true of "fixer uppers" as well. I have seen one hundred year old houses (the quality of wood and construction never to be again) that were well maintained and upgraded sell for the high asking price. Owners who neglected their historic "cash cow" and now encounter various circumstances which force them to sell, are now facing significant reduced values, if not foreclosures. They caused their own problem.

This is true for apartment restored historic apartment houses too and owners find such apartments command higher rents, less turnover, higher income tenants and less property damage when tenants move out,
2 3
REPLY
edited on  July 1, 2009 | 10:39 AM
Trapper, sacpress has reasons for its rules, and I'm not going to demand anything of them. I didn't say I objected to commenters having handles. I'm very much aware that they do. I just wrote that I don't respect their opinions as much when hiding behind those handles WHILE expressing shallow and poorly thought out opinions as many do and as yours is. Some persons having handles cite fact and express very sound arguments for their opinions. Those are more worthy of respect as hers/his is.

I knew when I didn't challenge savemidtown to reveal her/his real name that you would comment on that because it diverts attention from the weakness of your opinion. I've noticed you use this tact often. Fact is I have often disagreed with savemidtown's opinions. I did not in this case because it was well thought out, well articulated and gave historically accurate statements which supported her/his opinion. That is the difference between her/his opinion and yours.

Further, had you been around when the struggles she/he refers to were going on, you would know her/his identify too and the need for using a handle--just as some people must when writing a letter to the editor.

1 2
REPLY
July 1, 2009 | 2:52 PM
Weak Dale.

I also think your arguments are shallow. Please show me where in the past I have diverted attention while pointing out the obvious. I have not attacked anyone personally like you choose to do with me, while ignoring others who also fit the same mold. I have a hard time respecting your opinion when I can't know for sure this is really Dale instead of Bob. Anyone can use a fake name, like you could be doing right now, but I don't care because I was talking about the article unlike you.

So Dale, until you prove who you claim to be to everyone who posts here... shut up.
3 1
REPLY
July 1, 2009 | 1:32 PM
Good story, Suzanne!
0 0
REPLY
July 1, 2009 | 3:48 PM
Trapper, apparently you don't know shallow from depth--like you don't seem to know the difference between an attack on your opinions and personal. Looks like your personal attack in the last sentence proves my point.
1 3
REPLY
July 1, 2009 | 4:50 PM
I can't believe I've lowered myself to your level Dale.
3 0
REPLY
July 1, 2009 | 7:32 PM
Don't feed the troll, folks.
0 2
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background