STORYLINE Opinion

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Midtown neighborhoods alarmed by unsafe activites at event.

by Bill Burgua, published on June 29, 2009 at 12:10 PM

Storyline: Opinion RSS Feed

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images

Kings fans welcomed their new players to Sacramento. This was in a small neighborhood Midtown park. Attendance was reported as a few hundred. Pretty low turnout for such an event. The event was arranged at the last minute and in a venue that had never been used by the Kings before.  Another regionally advertised event, The Block Concert Series, was occuring at the same time. 

The neighborhood was freaked out when high powered pyrotechnics were illegally fired into the neighborhood at the end of this event. This was callous disregard for the safety of the lives and property of this neighborhood.  To understand the full implications of what occurred, speak with Niko King or Jim Doucette  in the fire department regarding the extreme risk of fires spreading rapidly through the densely crowed neighborhoods of Midtown.  The one city park employee monitoring  the event was pretty much helpless in dealing with the situation. There were police there.  They aided and abetted  the illegal action by closing 28th Street (with no permit) and standing around while pyrotechnics were fired. There was no firefighting equipment present.

The on going concern is that this follows a pattern that has gone in regard to special events in and around Marshall Park.  There is a last minute request for an event.  Approval is always given.  Something goes wrong.  No one is held accountable.  

When is the City of Sacramento officials going to learn that this massive overuse of a small nieghborhood park is to the benefit of a few and the detriment of many?

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

June 29, 2009 | 12:15 PM
Thank you for writing this up and pointing out the public safety issue at Saturday's event.
1 0
REPLY
June 29, 2009 | 12:25 PM
Hawa, thank you for your excellent article on the importance of sports to lots of folks. Also, thanks for your reconition that when some things are done hastily and not thought out well, that there can be serious consiquinces.
1 0
REPLY
June 29, 2009 | 7:48 PM
Thank you Bill for the write up. I'm afraid Marshall Park has become a city sanctioned free for all and all the talk by our Mayor and Council about the value of our neighborhoods is simply lip service. Funny how you never hear Kerridge or anyone out of the City Managers office espouse the value of our neighborhoods. The majority of city revenue comes from property tax yet the city will sacrifce our neighborhoods in a second for alcohol sales tax revenue. The priorities of our city are backwards - instead of instituting policies that encourage home ownership and property tax revenues, they're driving down property values and driving owners out for sales tax dollars.
1 0
REPLY
June 30, 2009 | 12:09 PM
I have yet to make it to one of these huge "block parties." I don't have much desire though, as they seem to be designed for the suburbanites rather than midtown/downtown residents. I understand the frustration over the noise etc. I can imagine the uproar that would be caused if one of these parties took place in a suburban neighborhood late into the night.
1 0
REPLY
June 30, 2009 | 8:54 PM
Excellent point Mark. Totally designed to draw people who don't live here or could care less when they trash neighborhoods. How would this go over in Land Park or East Sac? or anywhere other than Midtown? Nice to know Midtown residents are disposable and unimportant in the eyes of city leadership and some in the business community. .
1 0
REPLY
July 1, 2009 | 6:27 AM
Wait a minute...The Block Concert Series isn't even a City event. If I'm not mistaken, this event is produced by a group of midtown businesses, right? So, why is it all the City's fault? Savemidtown writes "The majority of city revenue comes from property tax yet the city will sacrifice our neighborhoods in a second for alcohol sales tax revenue." I'm pretty sure the City doesn't receive any alcohol sales tax revenue from a privately produced event with a beer garden. Just because the City likes the idea of having outdoor events hosted on the grid, doesn't mean that they've produced the event. Maybe this event isn't in the best location, I don't know. I just think that any criticism and/or praise for any local event should be pointed towards the actual event producers.
0 0
REPLY
July 1, 2009 | 11:39 AM
These events aren't taking place on private property, they take place in public parks and plazas. In order to put on such events, private parties receive permission from the city. I do agree that if people have concerns about an event on a public park, they should address the private parties who put on the event. The problem, and the reason why the aritcle's author addresses city government, is because city employees have failed to enforce city rules and regulations at these events--parking enforcement, fire safety, required notification, etcetera. If the city government is not willing to enforce its own rules at public events, event organizers will feel like they have free rein to run roughsod over neighborhoods.

This park is targeted because it is adjacent to a row of bars and restaurants. The owners of these restaurants are the organizers who put on the parties. They would not want them moved to another park or property because they want to generate traffic for their own business. While businesses have to generate this sort of traffic to make money, it crosses the line when events damage neighborhoods and harm the quality of life for neighborhood residents. If owner-occupied homes become rentals and rental properties can't rent to decent tenants because the neighborhood is the site of nonstop chaos, property values will drop, which means property tax revenues will drop. The costs of dealing with all of these street parties is starting to weigh heavily on law enforcement--two POP officers working in the Oak Park neighborhood were recently transferred to Midtown, because of increased problems in the central city due to the number of public events! Are decreased property tax revenue and increased costs for law enforcement and cleanup going to cost even more than the generated sales tax revenue can justify?

The city receives sales tax revenue from alcohol sales at privately produced events.
2 0
REPLY
July 9, 2009 | 6:35 AM
William - Thank for the response to my comment. You gave the article and some of the other comments a bit more clarity and context.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background