STORYLINE City Budget

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

City passes budget, 168 workers to be laid off Friday

by Kathleen Haley, published on June 16, 2009 at 10:29 PM

Storyline: City Budget RSS Feed

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images

The Sacramento City Council’s unanimous approval of Sacramento’s budget Tuesday means that city services could face major cuts and that the last day of work for 168 city employees is Friday. While the council adopted the budget, the situation may soon change because some of the city’s key unions, including its firefighters’ union, have not yet finished negotiations with the city.

Sacramento has balanced its budget and closed a gap of more than $43 million. City officials continued to say Tuesday that many cuts and layoffs could be averted if the unions make concessions. Since the budget has now been approved, any changes to the budget would be amendments.

Of the 168 layoffs approved with the budget, 41 will be from the Sacramento Fire Department, according to the latest numbers from the labor union that represents city firefighters.

The Sacramento Area Firefighters Local 522 and city managers are in the midst of controversial negotiations. Members of the firefighters’ union will finish voting on their latest tentative agreement with the city Wednesday afternoon. The results of the vote won’t be available until Thursday, said union spokesman Chris Harvey.

Several council members pressed for union concessions during the meeting.

"We need them to step up now," said Councilwoman Sandy Sheedy.

The final deadline for unions to approve labor agreements with the city for the 2009/2010 fiscal year is June 30 at midnight, according to acting city spokeswoman Wendy Klock-Johnson.

City firefighters and Local 522 member Brandon Doughty told the city council that he was one of the firefighters who would be laid off. In his remarks, he referenced the city government's slogan: “Get the customer to success.” He said that the layoffs mean that getting the customer to success is the last thing the city is concerned with. The city has made poor financial decisions in the past, he said.

Councilman Steve Cohn agreed in part with Doughty’s comments, saying that the city has approved some “foolish expenses” in the past. However, reversing those past decisions would not change the budget situation now, he said.

Harvey said after the vote that the city is unfairly saying that union concessions are the way to fix the city’s budget problems.

 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

June 17, 2009 | 7:58 AM
Among concessions that the union is pushing for :

- limousines filled with liquor, so as to ease the strain of using fire trucks as personal party vessels

- suv redesigned and painted red so firefighters can give joy rides without having to use actual fire trucks

- reinstatement of brass poles at fire stations, not for quick access to the ground floor but for porn stars to come to the stations and do dances. This will avoid the necessity of the SFD to attend porn star costume balls.


0 0
REPLY
June 17, 2009 | 3:14 PM
Absolutely 100% the dumbest thing I've ever heard. If you had done your homework you would see those involved in that scandal accounted for less than 1% of the Departments Firefighters, and all were fired. Furthermore, if someone at your job is found to say, ohhh I don't know, be involved in activities that are unbecoming does that to make you guilty of the same crime. If your coworker killed someone are you now a murderer by association because you go to the same job....
1 1
REPLY
edited on  June 17, 2009 | 2:19 PM
They will lay off -what? 41 firefighters...and then complain about the remaining firefighter's overtime. 7 days a week, 24 hours a day doesn't change. Perhaps they could plan the fires, accidents, and emergencies, and schedule appropriately? No more Santa Parades for you Mr. Mayor! For what's a parade without a firetruck? How about we put off some of our ridiculous spending on stupid construction projects such as replacing existing speed "BUMPS" with speed "HUMPS" until the economy's better? Don't believe me? Visit the City's eBid website: http://www.ebidboard.com/public/projects/index.asp?mbrguid=4653B5c9-2122-4249-8c6c-f8586f502aff and tell me the $74,000 wouldn't save firefighter's job!

p.s. Also note that the bid RFP's for the Mayor's personal security is closed....but the amount is not disclosed yet. Here's the link: http://www.cityofsacramento.org/generalservices/procurement/bid-results/2009.cfm
0 0
REPLY
June 17, 2009 | 9:40 PM
While closing a 43 million budget gap is a huge accomplishment, I'm curious about these 'foolish expenses'. Some are related to development subsidies and foolish land deals. A full independent audit of Development Services (Now the Community Services Dept.) is in order and then we will discover just how reckless the City Manager and head of Development Services really were with public funds and the public trust. The result is reduced public safety and other cuts like the now closed restrooms in most city parks - now the homeless (we now have even more due to county mental health service cuts) have absolutely no facilities except our alleys. Yeah that's gonna work out really well. It's despicable and inhumane.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background