STORYLINE Sacramento County Budget

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

County homeless programs could face major cuts

by Kathleen Haley, published on June 11, 2009 at 7:31 PM

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images

The director of the county department that works with the homeless population said Thursday that the department is still significantly hampered by the budget crisis even though county managers want to provide it with additional funding.

Bruce Wagstaff, director of Sacramento County’s Department of Human Assistance, told the Board of Supervisors the department is facing a general fund budget gap of $36.8 million and will no longer have the ability to fund 154 shelter beds for homeless people. Wagstaff presented his department’s outlook during the board’s third day of budget hearings on the county’s $180 million budget gap. A proposed budget for the 2009/2010 fiscal year may be approved by supervisors next week.

The social services presentations, which included DHA, attracted a crowd of more than 250 people Thursday morning. All seats in the auditorium were filled, and a second crowd filled additional seats that were set out in the lobby.

“While I am extremely appreciative of all the hard work that has gone into this -- to provide the reduced impact we’ve been able to come up with -- I am not here today to tell you we have fully addressed this reduction,” Wagstaff said.

The department continues to have a “very serious problem” that will lead to fewer services for homeless people, he said.

DHA’s general fund has been reduced about 38 percent over the last two years, Wagstaff said. Meanwhile, the department’s “case loads in every program are reaching unprecedented levels,” he said.

County officials are recommending that the board move $350,000 more to DHA’s budget. Wagstaff originally projected that the department would be forced to stop funding 328 shelter beds. DHA, with the help of other county departments and stakeholders, was able to restore 174 beds. But that still leaves 154 shelter beds in the county that will disappear, according to Wagstaff.

The department also plans to lay off 40 employees, according to its most recent count.

After Wagstaff’s presentation, Supervisor Susan Peters said that there were so many people who wanted to speak that testimony from the public could take more than three hours.

Valerie Feldman, acting managing attorney for Legal Services of Northern California, was one of many speakers who opposed cuts on county programs that help the homeless.

“At the time of the greatest need, this is not the time to balance the budget on the backs of the most vulnerable,” Feldman said.

 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

June 11, 2009 | 7:51 PM
I heard rumblings of this from a friend who works for DHA--two shelters to close and dramatic cuts in staff. So as soon as the city's winter shelter (held over until the end of this month) closes, another 140 shelter beds will get lost.

Expect another tent city--or several. Expect to see more people sleeping on the street, and get used to it, because it isn't going away any time soon.
0 0
REPLY
June 11, 2009 | 9:44 PM
I was present for the BOS meeting today and, quite frankly, was appalled by Mr. Wagstaff's blatant disregard for human dignity and respect. I understand that the county, state and federal budgets are challenging at best right now, and I also know that I do not envy Mr. Wagstaff's position. However, while the decisions may not be easy to make and/or present to the THOUSANDS of individuals affected, it is important to do so with genuine concern and respect. Mr. Wagstaff was observed to be dozing off to sleep during the meeting. While he may be tired from working long hours, driving around town in his new jaguar, or whatever, it’s unacceptable to tell people that their housing programs and employment will be affected drastically, then not be willing or open to listening to suggestion.
0 3
REPLY
June 12, 2009 | 11:04 AM
And what would you do mic1?

Remember, you have to be realistic in the amount of money available and how far projected service can be stretched.
3 0
REPLY
June 11, 2009 | 10:23 PM
Mr. Wagstaff is excatly what's wrong with Sacramento County, California, and the United States. Mr. Wagstaff is a leader that lacks integrity. I believe leaders should lead from the front at all times, even when it comes to their wallet. Mr. Wagstaff has made no attempt to sacrifice anything. I pray the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors demand his resignation immediatley. In order to get Sacramento County out of this huge mess we are in, it will take leaders of integrity. Mr. Wagstaff is not one.
1 3
REPLY
June 12, 2009 | 2:46 PM
It's time for churches and charities to step up and take these people in. The tax-paying public has no money and no appetite for paying for the chronically homeless. LIke "trapper" said, you have to be realistic.
3 0
REPLY
edited on  June 12, 2009 | 6:22 PM
100% spot-on Oracle. They need to go to familes first, then friends, then church. I should be the last person you ask, because I am already helping my family, friends, and folks at the church.
The difference? I get to pick who I give my family funds to.
3 0
REPLY
June 12, 2009 | 2:49 PM
Me and Big Juicy is movin to Davis. Them folks loves us and we kin set up a tent city downtown.
2 1
REPLY
June 12, 2009 | 3:47 PM
I agree with you, Oracle, that it's time for churches and charities to step up but there's only one problem to that: charities are suffering financially along with everyone else. People are donating out of their own pockets now less than ever and so charities are unable to accommodate the growing number of people sleeping on the streets.

The whole situation is really unfortunate and it doesn't seem that anyone really has an answer.
3 0
REPLY
June 12, 2009 | 3:54 PM
As you say, Casey, charities and churches are as strapped as anyone else, and the "tax-paying public" (that is to say, everyone) are the ones who support charities and churches. So if people expect charities and churches to step up, they're going to need the support of the tax-paying (and charity-giving) public to do so. Otherwise, they will find themselves in the same position as government-run social services: with no money, they can't help anyone.

Many people just want someone else to deal with the problem so they won't be bothered, but these days that is an unrealistic expectation. We can solve the problem, which will take work and probably sacrifice, or we can ignore it and deal with the repercussions of ignoring it, but it won't go away and there is nobody else to fix it for us.
0 0
REPLY
June 12, 2009 | 5:37 PM
Total! Been missing you! Got some Faulkner and a forty for you over by the pissing bridge--meet me there and you can come live with me. I've got a big space on the floor for you and I'll share my food stamps...Didn't you know the poor give more to charity?
http://www.portfolio.com/news-markets/national-news/portfolio/2008/02/19/Poor-Give-More-to-Charity
2 1
REPLY
June 15, 2009 | 3:42 PM
Loaves & Fishes had added $1.55 million to its books [Fund account; same as "equity" for a nonprofit.] over a two year period at the end of 2008. And, remember, Feb-to-Apr there was massive media coverage for donations beginning with the Oprah story. Also, at the end of 2008, Loaves & Fishes had over $2 million in liquid assets. I certainly think that L&F not only can but must step up, here! Sheltering the homeless is part of their mission statement. See Sacramento Press story: http://sacramentopress.com/headline/8681/Why_shouldnt_Loaves_Fishes_pay_to_shelter_homeless_rather_than_the_cashstrapped_county
0 0
REPLY
June 15, 2009 | 3:53 PM
Whoops. Here's that URL from above in three pieces. It cut off in my browser.
http://sacramentopress.com/headline/8681/
Why_shouldnt_Loaves_Fishes_pay_to_shelter_
homeless_rather_than_the_cashstrapped_county

By the way, on another front, I wouldn't worry about Winter Shelter not continuing. It's nearly summer now! Winter shelter is a seasonal shelter; it has always closed earlier in the year than this! Yes, there will be people in tents and in bags on the streets at night, but that isn't different than how it's always been. Hopefully, this year local government will have the wisdom to leave people alone.

The problem is upping the bed count when winter weather returns next November. God forbit the return of Winter shelter - it's been an extra-legal prison. Something else in the way of a shelter, and much cheaper, would be much better, both for the homeless and for anyone who thinks that we shouldn't be engaging in extra-legal means to corral people in the United States of America.
0 0
REPLY
October 19, 2009 | 12:29 PM
I feel that we need to educate the public on vitamins and the simple things we can take to ensure our minds to fire properly. I am willing to speak testimony to the public and the state of which I learned the last year at my previous position in a vitamin store. Miracle after miracles walked in and out the door. There is a way to educate the state and do a fund raiser for the supplements to be given to the homeless to enrich there minds. I can be reached at sgillam@vacasolano.com. for details and scheduling events.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background