STORYLINE Sacramento's most charming housing areas remain most insulated during recessionary period

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images

Special to Sacramento Press

By Dena Kouremetis

It may seem like an anomaly, but it really comes as no surprise to REO expert and Re/Max agent Ray Ponce.  Housing in Sacramento’s ‘grid’ – surrounded by freeways in all directions, has simply not become a casualty of foreclosure crisis.

“It’s just a matter of supply and demand,” says Ponce. “There has always been, and will continue to be a demand for housing in this area.  Most of the homes in this area were built during the 30’s, 40’s and 50’s during a period of time when quality of craftsmanship and individual style were important for homeowners.  These homes are built well and possess charm and character that today’s modern homes simply do not have.”

Ponce adds, “Since there is no more open space for builders to come in and throw up massive subdivisions of homogenous tract houses, the supply has remained relatively stable, even in these hard times.  You may have noticed that the areas of Sacramento with the largest number of foreclosures are the areas that grew the fastest during the boom years -- places like Elk Grove, Natomas, and Lincoln.  Most of this was caused from over-building and over-pricing.”

Another factor protecting grid homes from the foreclosure glut is the fact that many of the homeowners in East Sac and downtown are original owners or are heirs of original owners, according to Ponce, making them debt-free and lien-free as well.  Fewer liens mean fewer foreclosures. 

A snapshot of foreclosure activity, in mid April from Foreclosure Radar,for example,  reveals approximately 115 active foreclosures in the Elk Grove area as compared to only four in the grid area. The contrast has not changed significantly since then.

According to Ponce, other types of home owners in the grid tend to be young professionals; doctors, attorneys, and business owners, who could afford to put 20-50% down when they bought these homes.   “They purchased homes within their means and probably took out fixed rate loans.  The buyers who purchased in the new subdivisions may have been the victims of variable rate loans, since homebuilders’ in-house lenders tended to make qualifying easier for cash-strapped buyers.”

The grid area holding its own is consistent, judging by a story reported several years ago in the Sacramento Business Journal. In it, staff writer Michael Shaw found that homes in East Sacramento were selling handily while homes in other areas three times the size of the diminutive East Sac footprints were sitting on the market for at least six months at the time. “Homes located in East Sacramento, one of the city's venerable neighborhoods, along with others such as midtown, Land Park and Curtis Park have in many ways resisted the ravages of the housing downturn,” reported Shaw.

Rapid growth areas are traditionally hit hardest, reminiscent of the saying, ‘the bigger they come, the harder they fall ‘ The 2007 Sacramento Business Journal investigation revealed that Sacramento's strongest neighborhoods, however, have been landlocked for years, resulting in little new construction.  This makes them a smaller commodity, forcing prices to stay stable or even increase over time when other areas suffer.

The beauty of downtown-close neighborhoods isn’t all about economics, however.  The proximity to the downtown job core is a big draw for buyers, along with the area’s tree-lined streets, neighborhood shops and eateries and entertainment venues.

Instead of three car garages, you get charm,, instead of strip malls you get sophisticated Downtown Plaza, and instead of freeway gridlock, you get light rail, a few bus stops or a 10-minute drive.

Even though the grid area is resilient, however, it is certainly not immune.  “Just as in Sacramento as a whole, the inventory of homes for sale in core neighborhoods has crept up over the past two years,” reported Shaw, adding that multiple offers are not commonplace.  But homes within Sacramento’s coveted grid have been and always will be a draw, no matter how you slice it.



 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

May 28, 2009 | 10:58 PM
"30s, 40s and 50s?"

Most central city neighborhoods were built out from 1890-1930, with a smattering of pre-1890 houses dating back to a small handful of 1850s-1860s survivors. There are a few 1930s houses, maybe a small handful from the 1940s. 1950s construction in the central city was mostly things like office buildings and apartments, not single-family homes.

Unless the author is including the old suburbs (East Sacramento, Land Park etc) in "the grid," which they aren't. Those neighborhoods do share the central city's relative resilience to the recent unpleasantness in housing markets, primarily to their higher rate of owner-occupancy, relative charm, and relative lack of density. The central city features less than 10% single-family homes, with a very low owner-occupancy rate. Its high prices are due to its downtown proximity, the rarity of the housing stock, and the design review limitations (including historic districts) that preserve home values even in a down market.

Considering that real estate agents are starting to refer to homes for sale on MLK Jr Blvd. as "midtown," it isn't surprising that the boundaries of Sacramento's neighborhood-du-jour is starting to suffer some perception creep. For the detail fans in the house: the "Grid" is the old city grid, from the river to Alhambra Boulevard and from the railroad main line to Broadway. If it's outside that box, it is not in the grid. That's okay, there are plenty of nice places not in the grid.

"Sophisticated Downtown Plaza"? No, not really. Aside maybe from Macy's and a few mid-range clothing stores there isn't much left in sophisticated Downtown Plaza these days. And even if it wasn't, it's still basically a suburban mall without a parking lot. But there are a lot of interesting places to shop in the central city, they just aren't in a conveniently-named shopping district...at least, not yet.

All in all, not a bad little advertisement for your real estate business, despite a few minor inaccuracies.
2 0
REPLY
edited on  May 28, 2009 | 11:42 PM
Well said Mr. Burg. This article sounds like a real estate marketing piece and does not tell the whole truth about the grid. None of my neighbors on my pre 1910 built street are original or heirs. We have forclosures too but were largely spared because few speculators or house flippers were willing to take on the labor of love and expense that is owning a historic home. Living here is not all rosy either - there is plenty to hate about midtown too...trash trucks at 5 am, obnoxious drunks stumbling down your block - once in a while is tolerable but in recent years the noise levels and violent disturbances have escalated - its frequent now as is vandalism, property damage, car break - ins, house break ins, noisy neighbors, etc. That is the other truth on the grid.
3 0
REPLY
May 29, 2009 | 9:41 AM
There is little comfort in knowing that there is not a problem with foreclosure in the Grid. The biggest threat to the Grid is greed. Most of the residents of Midtown are not wealthy. Many were "pioneers" that moved into what at the time were undesirable neighborhoods that did have what could be nice family homes. They made them livable. Livable became popular. This attracted two groups of speculators. Developers who saw that they could buy 3-4 of the nice family homes for a relatively cheap price. Tear them down and put up a condo with units selling in the millions. The other group, the high end restaurant and bar owners, used the few narrow commercial areas. They displaced local business that served the neighborhood with ones that require patrons from outside the grid. This has resulted in the noise, traffic, unruly patrons and promotions to bring more of the same. Now we have residents who have lost faith and trust in the city government's ability and or willingness to protect the livability we created in these neighborhoods in the first place.
0 0
REPLY
May 29, 2009 | 12:24 PM
Well said and accurately stated, Mr. Burgua.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background