STORYLINE In and Around Sacramento

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

No high resolution image exists...

Loading images

It may be the best kept secret in politics: there's a statewide special election on May 19th that could have a greater impact on Sacramento's schools, fire stations, and budget than anything they're doing down at City Hall.

This special election is all about the state budget: the gaping $58 billion hole, and how the Governor and Legislature will go about fixing it. It includes new taxes, shifting of funds, the payback of funds to schools, and "modernizing" the state lottery so that it brings in more cash.

Led by Sacramento's own State Senate President pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, the California Teachers Association (CTA), and the California Professional Firefighters Association, the pro-reform forces http://www.cabudgetreformnow.com/splash.php?_c=xxzcw3j20w5zgp say these initiatives are a test of bipartisanship -- a compromise of both the left and the right that will keep the state afloat through tough times. Liberals won revenue increases, conservatives won a soft budget cap to prevent sharp rises in state spending, with the result being a balanced package that nobody seems to love but everyone can live with.

But there's plenty of opposition. On the right, the California Republican Party and the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association say any tax increases are acceptable. On the ultra-left, the California Faculty Association and some other labor unions say any cuts and a spending cap are unacceptable.

Meanwhile, the voting public is caught in the cross fire. According to some Field Poll numbers out today, all the initiatives except one are trailing in the polls. But these numbers might well be skewed because of what is expected to be a record low turnout. 

Pundits say the main reason voters aren't getting excited about this election is because the ballot initiatives are complex and confusing. 

But this much we know: if the initiatives fail to pass, there will be some immediate dire consequences.

As the newly-minted State Senate Republican leader told the Bee today, he will advocate for sharp reductions in state spending across-the-board. The CTA estimates that 75,000 teachers will lose their jobs in August. The California Professional Firefighters Association says it will lead to fire station closures. And health care providers would also be expected to see major cuts in services.

Sacramento's pols are near-unanimous in backing the initiatives. Mayor Kevin Johnson is expected to lead a press conference next week where he'll endorse the initiatives. Supervisor Roger Dickinson was at the California Democratic Party convention in Sacramento where he joined the overwhelming majority of delegates in supporting the propositions. Assemblymember Dave Jones supported the plan when it came to a vote earlier this year.

The Secretary of State's website features a guide to each of the initiatives -- well worth reading if you need to catch up with what's on the ballot. /www.voterguide.sos.ca.gov/title-sum/prop1a-title-sum.htm

(Full disclosure: I'm doing some work for the Yes! campaign)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.

April 29, 2009 | 04:39 PM
Steve, I think these initiatives are hard to swallow for voters, but I hope the Yes! Campaign prevails.
0 4
REPLY
April 29, 2009 | 05:57 PM
Yep, there's something for everyone to hate in them.
1 0
REPLY
April 29, 2009 | 05:16 PM
I think you mean "unacceptable" on HJTA's stance on tax increases in the fourth graph, but you are right that people are confused and frustrated. It is a no-win situation. They don't like the implications of voting yes and they are not going to like the reality of cuts if they vote no. And even if everything passes, it looks like we still may have to have more cuts. You have a tough job ahead of you.
0 1
REPLY
April 29, 2009 | 05:57 PM
Oops. yes I do. NO tax increase is ever acceptable to HJTA.
0 0
REPLY
April 29, 2009 | 09:03 PM
I wish there was a law to require government spending to be a net zero game or to result in a negative tax impact. (just like you and I need to do when we spend money. We spend only what we have, or less) Everyday I hear of more spending, more needs, more special interest, more everything. Wouldn't it be refreshing to have a new dawn in America of spending less in govenment? I wonder what it would be like to read stories of how the government found a way to do something better using the same money, or do the same job for less!
Our household income has dropped over 50% in 24 months (we are in retail of big ticket durable goods), and we cannot afford more taxs.
5 0
REPLY
April 30, 2009 | 01:18 PM
The reason is spending is going up is exactly because of situations like you're in -- more demand for services for folks that cant afford them. More people without health care? More aid for the uninsured. Swine flu? Call in the CDC. More crime? We need more cops. Etc.
0 1
REPLY
April 30, 2009 | 07:04 AM
It's time to say enough is enough...California already has the highest tax rates in the country.

When it comes to taxation, government will never stop the increases of it's own accord, citizens need to get out and vote no on all of the propositions.
5 2
REPLY
April 30, 2009 | 01:19 PM
California doesn't have the highest tax rates in the country by any stretch. Particularly in upper income brackets.
2 2
REPLY
May 4, 2009 | 10:16 AM
These initiatives are going down in flames. I've already voted and so have all our friends and neighbors - a big fat NO!
2 0
REPLY
May 5, 2009 | 08:52 AM
California is going to melt down this year...these propositions will not pass... oops... then what?

What really pisses me off is that the average Californian refuses to blame our politicians for our financial meltdown, we keep electing the same morons back into office.

Unless you support throwing out all incumbents, you should keep your mouth shut when the state goes belly up.
1 0
REPLY
May 5, 2009 | 08:55 AM
Steve, the reason spending in California is going up is because of illegal immigration, excessive government salaries, excessive retirement packages and providing too many services to freeloaders.

If you offer free services, people from all over the world will come here to take advantage of those free services...it's like feeding stray cats..they will keep coming. they will bring their family and they will reproduce at alarming rates.
1 1
REPLY
May 8, 2009 | 08:34 PM
VOTE 1ABC NO, 1DEF YES
Vote for liberty.
0 0
REPLY
May 14, 2009 | 10:35 PM
Excerpted from above:

"As the newly-minted State Senate Republican leader told the Bee today, he will advocate for sharp reductions in state spending across-the-board"

An idea whose time should have come a long time ago.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
TYPE YOUR COMMENT IN THE BOX BELOW
EDIT YOUR COMMENT IN THE BOX BELOW cancel edit

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Forgot Password?
New Users Create an Account Here
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com