STORYLINE Sacramento City Hall / Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

City Budget: City in talks with firefighters

by Kathleen Haley, published on April 28, 2009 at 10:20 PM

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images

A city official said Tuesday he was optimistic about current efforts to save Sacramento $5 million and 50 jobs through negotiations with the local firefighters’ union.

Gus Vina, a Sacramento assistant city manager, said the city is currently in talks with the Sacramento Area Firefighters Local 522.

The city government is trying to convince the firefighters’ union to give up pay increases scheduled for July.

Vina said the city and the firefighters’ union are engaged in “very productive” discussions.

If the firefighters’ union does not give up its pay increases, Vina said the city will need to lay off 50 department employees. The positions could come from any of the following types of firefighting jobs: firefighters, captains or the operators who drive the fire trucks.

But if the union makes concessions, Vina said, the city will save $5 million and won’t need to make the cuts.

Meanwhile, Chris Harvey, spokesman for the firefighters’ union, said the union disagrees with the city’s assessment that it will need to lay off 50 firefighters. Harvey called the figure of 50 layoffs “arbitrary.” He said that if 10 people from the department retire, the city wouldn’t have to lay off 50 people.

In addition to the discussion of whether the firefighters will give up scheduled pay increases, Harvey said the union is also discussing other issues with the city.

It does not necessarily mean that if Vina is happy, then the “union is prepared to give back the raises,” Harvey said.

But Harvey also said the union is happy that the attitude from both parties in the negotiations has been positive.

The city and Local 522 have not always had the best relationship, Harvey noted. If nothing else, the tone of the current negotiations is much better than past negotiations, he said.


Sacramento’s deficit is about $50 million. The city will release its proposed 2009/2010 budget Friday. It must approve a final budget by June 30.

Vina estimated that the city still needs to cut about 300 positions in city government in order to address its budget problems.

He said he hopes to complete negotiations with all city unions by the end of May.

If management convinces all eight of the city’s labor unions to make concessions, the city may only need to cut 150 positions, Vina said.
He pointed out that the city currently has a volunteer separation program in which employees accept buyouts.

The employee buyouts are part of the city’s strategy to further reduce the number of layoffs it may make, according to Vina.

So, Vina said, the number may be even lower than 150.

The city is asking the non-emergency services unions to give up pay increases, as well as for employees to take one furlough day per month, according to Vina.

City Manager Ray Kerridge wrote in an April 3 letter to employees that layoff notifications will take place in early June.

Joan Bryant, director of public employees for the Stationary Engineers, which includes a local union chapter for Sacramento workers, said the union has been talking with city management about the magnitude of the city’s budget deficit and management’s expectations for workers.

She said the union needs to gather more information to make sure it will act in the best interests of its members and the city.

Asked if the union’s members might be willing to give up pay increases and start a once-per-month furlough, Bryant said the union will look at all of those options.

She said the union was waiting to receive information from the city. Once the union gets the information it needs, it will have a better idea of what it will decide, she added.

At this point, one union has made concessions to the city. The police department’s union, the Sacramento Police Officers Association, chose to give up its July salary increases, Vina said. As a result, the city will not cut police officers, he noted.

 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

April 29, 2009 | 8:00 AM
Firefighters are prevented under law from striking...Since they cannot strike, there is no need for collective bargaining.

If it wasn't for the unions controlling each of our city council members we would not be in this pickle. Local 522 and SPOA give huge sums of money to candidates, in return those candidates hike up the salaries of union workers in a campaign money laundering scheme. The taxpayers are forced at gunpoint to foot the bill to pay for Democrat candidates to run for local and state office.

All municipal employees pay should be based on the economy, like the rest of us in the private sector. Why should government employees get a free ride through economic downturns? If our firefighters can't tighten their belts like the rest of our community, they should go look for work elsewhere.
3 0
REPLY
April 29, 2009 | 12:23 PM
It may be more beneficial, and a really strong argument to link to the sites that show who gives to whom, rather than just saying it. If you put together a really comprehensive article showing which council members get contributions from which unions, that would be a powerful story.
1 0
REPLY
April 29, 2009 | 8:22 PM
"If it wasn't for the unions controlling each of our city council members we would not be in this pickle."

Hmm, I think the real estate bust might better explain the City's budget problems. I googled and found these two interactive maps that show foreclosure rates on the one hand and state budget gaps on the other:

http://www.newyorkfed.org/mortgagemaps/

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/11/17/us/20081117_budget_graphic.html

You can take a look and make up your own mind if there is a correlation.
0 1
REPLY
April 29, 2009 | 11:27 AM
How likely is it that 10 firemen will retire? Is that standard?
1 0
REPLY
April 29, 2009 | 7:11 PM
Actually Geoff I am working on a detailed and lengthy story on how the corruption in Sacramento works. I will post it on the Sacramentocitizen.com website once it is fully functional.
0 0
REPLY
April 29, 2009 | 8:05 PM
That's great to hear. I look forward to reading it, and you are welcome to repost here if you'd like.

We also are going to continue to scrutinize local government and hold them accountable, look for more of that sort of reporting in the near future on The Sacramento Press.
1 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background