STORYLINE Homeless but not hopeless

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Homeless advocates fight to maintain their rights.

by Hana King, published on April 22, 2009 at 10:24 AM

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images

Since the existence of tent city gained national attention on the Oprah Winfrey Show, a firestorm of controversy has ensued. A lot has been said in the last few weeks about the ‘homeless problem’ in Sacramento. Government officials have scrambled to free up shelter beds and come up with enough funding flush into alternative housing programs. But, the issue of homelessness does not appear to be going away anytime soon and throwing money at it may not be the answer.

“You can put government money on the table,” say Mark Chaclan, former Loaves and Fishes volunteer, “but there are still going to be people that have to resort to tent city.” Chaclan visited tent city twice last week to join fellow Loaves and Fishes volunteers in the fight to protect the rights of Sacramento’s homeless.

“Loaves and Fishes has taken a stance on the issue,” he says, “and they are ready to go to the trenches.”

In the meantime, as the bulldozers start to roll, hundreds of homeless men and women once again find themselves displaced.

Trevor McClure knows what it is like to be down and out. He was homeless for three years, beginning in 2003 and he wants to dispel the myth that the solution to homelessness is simply ‘getting a job’ as some more callous critics may believe.

“It’s damn near impossible to get a job when you’re homeless,” he says. “you have to be clean and presentable. You have to be able to shower every day. By the time to you get off work, you’ve lost your bed [in the shelter].”

McClure often found himself sleeping at the river. “The Union Gospel Mission doesn’t accept women,” he says, “and I’ll be dammed if I’m gonna sleep in a shelter and my wife’s gonna sleep on the streets.”

John Sherba was also homeless for a four year period starting in 2002. While he was able to make due with the limited resources at hand, he acknowledges that leading a transient existence is neither easy nor preferable.

“I slept on the streets, on the sidewalks, in front of the union Gospel Mission, and at the river,” he says. Sherba slept on the river for three out of the fours years that he was living outdoors and was able to keep the peace with park rangers and other residents.

“We made friends with them because we kept our camp clean. They liked the way we did what we did” he says, “but the bottom line is that camping in Sacramento is still illegal.”

Law breakers will be punished. “We had to keep moving constantly,” says Sherba, “They [Sacramento sheriffs] took everything I owned and threw it in a dump truck. They took the tent and everything in it.”

“When you’re homeless,” adds McClure, “every penny you have goes to surviving. You have to be able to eat and you have to make sure that you will be able to replace your tent and stuff when it gets taken away.”

The instability of the lifestyle and the illegality of camping within the Sacramento city limits are why some homeless advocates believe that places like tent city are necessary.

“They need a place for people to camp that’s legal,” says Sherba, “They can provide as many beds as they want to, but there are people that just can’t live that way for whatever reason.”

Sherba, who was also a volunteer at Loaves and Fishes while he was homeless understands that not everybody can make it indoors.

“There are people that are mentally ill,” he says, “I call them ‘happy campers’. I’ve seen them talk to telephone polls, but in the end, they don’t cause no harm to anybody.”

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

April 22, 2009 | 10:48 AM
Great interviews and perspective on the homeless issue. Did you find it hard to get people to agree to talk with you for this article? Thanks for sharing!
1 0
REPLY
April 22, 2009 | 2:41 PM
Did you interview these individuals onsite? It would be great if you had photos to accompany this article.
1 0
REPLY
April 23, 2009 | 3:34 PM
We live in Midtown about a mile from the tent city site and our experience with the tent people is not positive. With consistant tresspassing, vandalism, and property theft that adds up to more than $2000 a year from our home, we watch the behaviors of those that do not live on our block.

“When you’re homeless,” adds McClure, “every penny you have goes to surviving". This is very far from what we see, with open drunkeness and drug use. The money must be there, as they are getting those products.

Loaves and Fishes would do well to sort out and focus their efforts to the truely "homeless" folks who need a temporary helping hand from the criminals that you can watch from my front porch 24/7, who they appear to be feeding, that allows theese folks to spend money on drugs and alcohol because they have food given to them.

1 0
REPLY
April 24, 2009 | 2:04 PM
Not providing food and resources (through Loaves & Fishes) could potentially make people these individuals more aggressive and violent in attempts to get things that they need. Perhaps rehab access would be most helpful to this situation?
1 0
REPLY
edited on  April 24, 2009 | 2:35 PM
Yes, we agree that different sorts of rehap would help those who want it, and I believe that is mostly currently available at no charge, plus these folks should be turning to their families, friends and church for teomporary support while they work on fixing their situation. (the state has lots of programs, there is AA, the church, etc) We however do not agree that we should be extorted into feeding the slacker people, (those who abuse the goodwill of others so they can selfishly spend a casual lifestyle of using drugs and drinking), as deterent to them breaking the law.
0 0
REPLY
June 11, 2009 | 11:18 AM
Not all homeless are messed up on drugs or alcohol. I'm in Southern California (Beverly Hills,
of all places) and they just now (early May,2009) started a campaign to run homeless people
out of the city. Police are citing people for so-called "camping"...and first-time-ever "rules and
regulations" signs have sprung up. Somebody needs to mount a legal challenge...The 2 dozen
or so remaining homeless basically did nothing to hurt this city! The harm was done by people
who breezed through town,and are no longer here. I have no family and just had some bad luck.
Could happen to anyone.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background