STORYLINE Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Progress report on the arena

by Ellen Dominguez, published on February 21, 2012 at 11:30 PM

Storyline: Politics RSS Feed

1 of 2
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 2
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image

Mayor Kevin Johnson emphasized on the need for a completed term sheet and signs of commitment from interested companies in order to finish the new arena project in 2015.

Johnson gave a progress report on the plans to build this new arena in Sacramento at Tuesday’s weekly press conference. Johnson said that there were many questions still in the air that were being discussed even as he stood in City Hall, mainly questions on what companies will contribute to the arena project, and how.

Johnson said that his hope is that by Feb. 28, all stakeholders involved will be in agreement on a term sheet that outlines all financial areas of the project – a sort of rough draft for the budgeting plans of the arena. The reason this term sheet must be put together so soon is so it can be presented to the NBA for review on March 1.

From there, the remaining 10 companies interested in leasing the city’s parking system should state their intended part in the term sheet and whether they find said terms acceptable.

Johnson said that, at this point, the term sheet and parking companies’ responses are the two most critical components.

In order to complete the arena by 2015, Johnson said design work must begin within 30 days. Johnson said that a downtown venue like this would increase the city’s chances for hosting events like The Winter Olympics, and could also help revitalize the downtown area and bring in additional revenue.

“We need to get the T’s crossed and I’s dotted in the next few weeks,” Johnson said. “If we don’t, we’re not going to make the 2015 deadline.”

One piece of the jigsaw puzzle that the term sheet must place is the Anschutz Entertainment Group (AEG), the current king of sports teams and entertainment venues ownership. According to Johnson, AEG is going to play a critical role in the financial investment of the arena, but what’s uncertain is how much of a role. Even now, Johnson said, it’s still too early to say that they’ve officially signed on to the project.

“We know they’re going to be in as an operator,” Johnson said. “We’re still negotiating what equity investment level they’ll participate in.”

There have been rumors that the Maloof family won’t be able to afford to remain owners of the team and be strong tenants of the arena. Johnson said that the NBA has been negotiating on the behalf of the Maloof family, and no one has given him the impression that they’d be unable to support the team financially.

Johnson said that it has always been “scenario one” for him that the Maloofs remain the owners and that the team remains in Sacramento.

“I think what the public needs to understand is they’ve never missed a loan payment in terms of Sacramento,” Johnson said. “They’ve honored their financial obligation in Sacramento, and I don’t have any knowledge of anything different.”

Another concern is whether the City Council will agree to the term sheet once presented, though Johnson said the majority of the council has remained positive toward the project. Johnson said that he thinks if the council is assured that parking rates and jobs are protected, then the council shouldn’t be an obstacle to the project.

“I think the goal on the 28th is to try to address all of those questions in a way that council would feel good about and satisfied with,” Johnson said.

Finally, there’s the question of whether the NBA will accept the presented term sheet. The term sheet may have to fine-tuned for the NBA to accept it, if not completely rewritten. Johnson said that he believes that leasing the city’s parking has been a big “game-changer” in getting the NBA to side with the city and close the deal at acceptable terms for both sides.

“If we do our part, then it forces the NBA and the Kings to do their part, as long as you create a win-win and a fair situation,” Johnson said. “At the end of the day, all that we can control though is ultimately our part.”

Despite these loose ends, unanswered questions and the approach of the deadline, Johnson said that he remains confident that building will begin on time and that the current level of progress is admirable.

“I’m just proud that even though there’s a lot of moving parts, I think the city is really doing its part to deliver and bring forward a fair deal for everyone involved,” Johnson said.

Johnson added that he will meet with NBA Commissioner David Stern over the weekend.

“That’ll be a chance to build on the positive conversations that we’ve had to date,” Johnson said, “to sit down face to face and hopefully get us across the finish line.”

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

February 22, 2012 | 7:39 AM
So when does the public get to actually see this term sheet? It sounds like things are going to immediately transition from "Hang on, we're still working out the details, wait until the term sheet is ready before you ask for details" to "What, haven't you seen the term sheet? It's too late to argue about details!" over the weekend--or maybe not until Tuesday night.
2 4
REPLY
February 22, 2012 | 7:49 AM
The mayor said he expects the term sheet to be available by Thursday, a few days ahead of the Feb 28 council meeting. It has to pass through a few hands first, including city manager office and city attorney office then to city clerk office to be posted for the public. Still, Johnson seemed confident at the presser that Thursday would be the day. We'll see.
4 1
REPLY
February 22, 2012 | 7:58 AM
Johnson said his goal was to make public a parking lease proposal by three working days before the council meeting. That would mean this Thursday.

"I don't want to say that I can guarantee that, though, because there's certain things that are beyond my control." said Johnson.

http://www.kcra.com/news/30509566/detail.html#ixzz1n7vVbGgk
3 2
REPLY
February 22, 2012 | 11:56 AM
To craft a lease would be a violation of the due diligence that was promised in the original staff report.

Additionally the mayor's own words yesterday put the city in a terrible negotiating position.

So Johnson wants to lock in what the city has to get from the parking lease....prior to any negotiations. Who get's the upper hand in that?

Oh right, he was a political science major. And seems well versed in spending other peoples money.

So how much control and for how long of a term will the "experts" in the room want for the amount of cash Johnson will tell them he needs? How long did Daley negoiate that deal in Chicago? 3 days?

Sound Familiar? How did it work out for Chicago?

1 1
REPLY
February 22, 2012 | 12:34 PM
Daniel Stern seems to have a different view:

http://www.sacbee.com/2012/02/21/4281642/stern-kings-will-make-substantial.html

'In effect, whatever money AEG puts in is because of give-backs by the team ... so we see that as a team contribution," Stern said. "Whether it ultimately closes all the gaps, we'll know as we negotiate continuously and I fully expect that we will be negotiating in Orlando (this weekend when team and city representatives meet for the All-Star game)"'

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2012/02/21/4281642/stern-kings-will-make-substantial.html#storylink=cpy

In other words, the amount the Maloofs, AEG and the NBA are expected to contribute will still be under discussion until this weekend, which comes after Thursday. And apparently there is already a major discrepancy: in all the estimates we have seen so far, AEG's expected (but unconfirmed) contribution is considered separate from the funds coming from the Maloofs. Now Stern says that any AEG contribution should be considered part of the Kings' tally. That kind of blows a hole even in the cheerily optimistic rough draft, in addition to making any information we get on Thursday unlikely to survive the weekend.
1 2
REPLY
February 22, 2012 | 1:48 PM
...and the arena vote has been officially pushed out another week.

http://www.kcra.com/news/30518431/detail.html
1 1
REPLY
February 22, 2012 | 6:21 PM
David Stern's comments are a savvy way to negotiate away from Maloof money and to AEG money. It makes the whole thing look better and more equitable.

Remember that as the commish he represents the interests of his owners, not the players, city or fans. It's fun to read comments like this because you can see a craftsman at work. This isn't the first time on this ride for Stern.
0 1
REPLY
February 22, 2012 | 9:23 PM
Burg, perhaps I'm reading that quote a bit different. But to me the offset by AEG means that AEG will put in more if the Malindas agree to less yearly revenue sharing on game nights. Also, this applies to parking revenue that the Malindas may give up to AEG for sporting events. So if the Numbers are AEG 50mil and Kings an upfront 85mil, Aeg will add more to their input and the kings put in less, But the over all contribution from both parties stays the same. This also puts pressure on the Malindas, if they don't agree to the terms being negotiated for them, Stern unleashes the Burkle.
0 0
REPLY
February 22, 2012 | 7:45 AM
Great article, Ellie.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background