STORYLINE Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

2011 recap: The fight to keep the Kings in Sacramento

by Melissa Corker, published on December 28, 2011 at 9:17 PM

Storyline: Politics RSS Feed

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

The question of whether Sacramento will get a new sports arena heated up this year, as Sacramento Kings owners threatened to relocate the team to Anaheim and potential arena sites – such as a land swap with Cal Expo – came and went.

Despite an emotional rollercoaster ride for Kings fans this year, supporters of the team refused to throw up their hands in defeat. Here’s what 2011 looked like from the bleachers.

As plans for a land swap between the state fairgrounds at Cal Expo and the current Natomas arena site fell through, a task force appointed by Mayor Kevin Johnson recommended that Sacramento developer group ICON-Taylor explore the viability of building an arena in the downtown area.

Business leaders from the Natomas Chamber of Commerce wanted the City Council to reject the task force recommendation, saying they felt Natomas was “fighting an uphill battle” against losing the then-named Arco Arena as the Kings’ home turf.

Image by: Suzanne Hurt The owners of the Sacramento Kings, the Maloof family, confirmed suspicions that they were considering relocating the team to Anaheim by requesting a filing extension with the NBA to give the owners until at least April 14 – the day after the Kings season ended – to make a decision.

The NBA granted an extension to 5 p.m. May 2, and Kings fans went into overdrive to convince the Maloofs that the team should stay put.

Between a grassroots “Here We Stay” campaign, “painting the town purple” and sold-out games, there was little question of the importance Sacramentans placed on keeping the Kings in town.

Image by: Steven Chea Still, negotiations between the Maloofs and the city of Anaheim seemed to be well under way – until problems with financing emerged.

Anaheim was reportedly making plans to issue $75 million in lease revenue bonds to entice the team to move, but Sacramento city officials intervened, saying that the Maloofs would first have to repay $77 million in bond debt to Sacramento.

Image by: Courtesy: Anaheim Arena Management A private group successfully halted the issuance of the Anaheim bonds, and Billionaire Pittsburgh Penguins co-owner Ron Burkle stepped up with plans to buy the Sacramento Kings from the Maloofs to keep the team in Sacramento.

Just before the final filing deadline to officially request relocating the team, an NBA relocation committee came to town and took over the Kings offices to study the possibility of keeping the Kings in Sacramento. The committee was welcomed with open arms – and plenty of purple.

Image by: Ben Ifeld At almost the same time, tribal leaders from Thunder Valley Casino pledged $1 million toward the effort to stop the Kings from moving to Anaheim, bringing the total of business pledges to keep the Kings in Sacramento to more than $10 million.

In addition to business interests, retired Kings player Chris Webber pledged his support – along with additional financial backing from private investors – to keep the effort going.

Image by: Kati Garner Finally, on the day of the filing deadline, the Maloofs announced they would not move the Kings out of Sacramento – this year.

The question of an adequate arena was still open, however, and NBA officials said they would support the team moving next year if a new arena could not be built to replace the Kings’ current facility, Power Balance Pavilion.

Image by: Sacramento Press file photo After a huge push for ticket sales to the next season, the Maloofs asked Johnson to stand in for them at the NBA draft lottery in New Jersey.

In June, with four months before the start of the 2011-12 basketball season, Kings supporters got down to business formulating a plan for a new arena – this time, with the help of a coalition of interested parties from business, sports, finance and development sectors.

The coalition – called the “Think Big” committee – worked on a self-imposed 100-day deadline to come up with a “menu of options” for financing a new entertainment and sports complex to be built at the railyards site downtown.

Image by: Populous The Think Big committee released a series of reports over the 100-day period that discussed financing options including strategic use of public land, user fees and leasing the city’s parking system.

Two opinion polls surfaced – one commissioned by the Think Big committee and one by City Councilwoman Sandy Sheedy – to gauge public support of a new sports and entertainment complex. Despite the opposing results of the polls, Johnson and members of the Think Big committee continue to pursue a plan to build an arena and keep the Kings in Sacramento.

The latest aspect of the financing plan – leasing the city’s parking system to a private operator for an up-front lump payment to get construction under way – is in the earliest stages.

Image by: Steven Chea What’s next for the Kings and the city of Sacramento?

2012 promises fervent action on the part of supporters, developers and the entire Think Big committee to have a solid arena plan in place before the March 1 deadline for Kings’ owners to once again attempt to relocate the team.

Meanwhile, Kings fans are filling seats for games, staying positive and hanging on for the final loop-de-loop of this wild ride.

Melissa Corker is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press. Follow her on Twitter @MelissaCorker.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

December 28, 2011 | 10:47 PM
Of course, that $1 million pledge from Thunder Valley has resulted in a rift in the tribe's leadership, triggering a recall drive that now jeopardizes that pledge:

http://www.sacbee.com/2011/11/08/4037734/thunder-valley-casino-tribe-split.html

And how could this story be called complete without mentioning that our current arena's sponsor, Power Balance, is filing for bankruptcy now that people have realized wearing a rubbber band on your wrist doesn't affect your athletic performance? They lost $9 million this year, and have filed for bankruptcy, which makes it unlikely that they will be able to honor their $700,000 per year sponsorship commitment--they are already $100,000 behind in that commitment.

http://ransackedmedia.com/2011/12/06/power-balance-days-away-from-folding/

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/money_co/2011/11/power-balance-files-for-bankruptcy-after-retracting-health-claims.html

Also revealed this year was that AEG stands to lose $500 million in media rights if the Kings move to Anaheim, which may explain their strong support for a Sacramento arena, not to mention the possibility of a profitable lease arrangement like the one they have with Kansas City, where AEG gets paid each year from arena proceeds before a cent goes to the city's construction debt.

http://ransackedmedia.com/2011/12/17/aeg-helps-sacramento-in-order-to-protect-the-lakers/

And let's not forget the overly-ardent Kings fan who apparently unwittingly filed a Fair Political Practices Commission complaint against City Councilmember Sandy Sheedy, provided to him by parties who are still unknown--a complaint that was tossed out by the FPPC.

http://ransackedmedia.com/2011/11/02/who-is-really-behind-the-complaint-against-sandy-sheedy%E2%80%99s-arena-poll/
3 3
REPLY
December 29, 2011 | 5:46 AM
Part of the picture as well;

The Maloofs sell off the business that their family originally created to build their fortune:

http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/stories/2009/12/07/daily13.html

And the Maloofs lose their majority stake in the Palms Casino after having to restructure $400 million in debt:

http://ransackedmedia.com/2011/06/15/maloofs-lose-control-of-palms-casino/
0 2
REPLY
December 29, 2011 | 10:58 AM
Yeah, the sale of the distributorship and trucking business were huge. There is so little wiggle room for the either side financially.
0 0
REPLY
December 29, 2011 | 4:44 PM
let's not forget you in your undies typing away all day eating a bowl of cheerios.
3 2
REPLY
December 30, 2011 | 6:21 PM
Not sure who that was aimed at, but I bet Isaac, William or I are fully clothed. I, for one, am writing this while working late and helping to moderate the site - at my desk - at the office.
0 0
REPLY
December 28, 2011 | 11:18 PM
Oh those pesky facts that just get in the way of KJ's vision. So you know we don't need to listen to any facts.
2 4
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background