STORYLINE What doesn’t suck about Regional Transit?

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

What Doesn't Suck about Regional Transit?

by Angela Murray, published on April 9, 2009 at 11:11 PM

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images

A lot! Eager readers expecting a slam on Regional Transit – read on – you might be surprised. That’s another story to be written by someone with an opposing point of view, of which I’m sure there are many. In two years of consistently riding Regional Transit, the complaints I’ve heard run the gamut.

What hasn’t been heard – why nine times out of ten, I ditch my car in favor of Regional Transit? When I started riding the bus, I received numerous offers of rides along with groans of pity when I mentioned I’d be bussing over. To this day, I’ve not yet managed to convince my friends that riding the bus is fun! It’s not just a cost factor – it’s everything from a sense of community to the chance to read the newspaper.

Contrary to popular belief, most drivers do want to talk to and help people. I’ve seen drivers stop on a dime for what’s deemed in the public transit community as “a runner”. I’ve seen them go out of their way to help an elderly or disabled person, and I’ve seen the riders courteously offer their seats to other riders when the bus is full. I’ve personally experienced this, having been offered a seat numerous times when standing on the bus. I’ve made acquaintances and learned about new things happening in the community, and, nine times out of ten, I arrive at work on time.

While I have long been a proponent of Regional Transit, last week, my belief in the system was cemented when I left my lunch on the previous bus or on the island at the connecting point. I mentioned it to my driver, who said that when he went back to the connecting point, he’d check to see if it was there, stated the time he would be back at the stop near my work, and left. Right – I knew I’d never see that lunch again. Ever the optimist, however, I proceeded to the stop at the allotted time, and there he was – right on time – and – there was my lunch! It had to have taken a tremendous effort of coordination for him to recover the lunch and bring it back to me. I really enjoyed my lunch that day!

My opinion is that the issues that most people experience are not due to inadequacies on the part of the drivers, they are due to inadequacies in funding, support, and lack of knowledge about how to use the system – but that’s for another story.

Every morning, I look forward to my brisk (usually very brisk) walk to the bus stop. I get exercise, fresh air, reading time, and save money to boot. Who knows who I will meet or what I will learn today? I need to close for now…I have a bus to catch.
 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

April 10, 2009 | 8:54 AM
I definitely agree. Over the past year or so I have slowly weaned myself off of the car habit, taking advantage of the fact that both my home and my office are within a couple blocks of light rail stations. I am a student at Sacramento State, and took advantage of my student transit pass. It takes about as long to ride to school on the bus as it does to drive, the walk to class from the bus stop is about as long as the one from the parking lot, and I used the time on the bus for last-minute studying or reviewing notes. Taking Light Rail to work takes about the same amount of time as driving, give or take a couple of minutes.

One difference I noticed was that I came in to work in a mellower mood. Driving to work, even a short commute of two miles, often got me stressed due to having to negotiate with downtown traffic. Riding to work is a different experience, as instead of dealing with cars you deal with people. While not everyone on the train is uniformly nice, people tend to bow to social pressure and behave courteously on the train. Once in a great while a train is a few minutes late, but generally light rail keeps a very tight schedule very well.

The bus has a different vibe, since the driver can interact more directly with passengers. Regular riders greet each other and have running conversations on the bus on every subject. Having a monthly pass allows some really flexible transit options: if I'm walking somewhere and a bus happens to be going by, I can hop on for a few blocks and save a few minutes.

At my last job, my employer paid for parking as I sometimes had to drive for work, so I still drove once or twice a week. At my new job, there is no parking, but I never need to drive, so I leave the car at home. I still drive when running big errands or going places on the weekends, but I fill the tank about once a month and mostly the car sits on the street.
3 0
REPLY
April 10, 2009 | 10:02 AM
I agree with you too. I grew up in places where public transportation (plus bicycle) is so common. I went to school and commuted to work by trains and buses or I rode a bike. I like taking a bus or train because I can read, work or take a nap, things I cannot do while driving. I also thought it interesting to observe people. Angela, your article makes me think about exploring more about the Sacramento's RT. I have not used much but I always had a good experience when I used a bus or Light Rail. Except that many people seem to pity me when I use RT. I have had these responses, "Oh no, do you have to take a bus? Ask someone to drive you." or "Are you going to be really okay?", as if I were entering some dangerous world. Bu I do hope that the transit system will improve in the future. Sometimes, it takes too much time to travel by RT.
2 0
REPLY
April 10, 2009 | 10:58 AM
Here are some of the things we've experienced on bus 51 and 53 (do these even run anymore?)

- people peeing
- people covered in pee
- fist fights
- obnoxious teenagers harassing women
- drug deals
- bus drivers peeling away leaving people who were just a second too late at the stop screaming and upset

Things are a bit different if you are taking lite rail or the bus in a less 'affluent' part of town.
1 0
REPLY
edited on  April 10, 2009 | 11:21 AM
waldorfandstatler: The first five items you list have nothing at all to do with transit or buses and everything to do with community and neighborhoods. The fact that Sacramento's community includes those elements is a sad tale.

As for the "bus drivers peeling away" they are the exception that prove the rule.
2 0
REPLY
April 10, 2009 | 11:27 AM
Thank you John - waldorfandstatler, I haven't personally taken those buses, so I can't attest to these issues in those areas - and it sounds like you haven't taken them lately either (for good reason). I haven't addressed transportation or lack thereof to the outlying areas yet, though I plan to in a future story. I can attest to the fact the Regional Transit does an excellent job with the funding they are provided, and our community is fortunate to have an option. My experience is mostly in the Howe Avenue/Arden/CSUS/Downtown, and Folsom commutes.
1 0
REPLY
April 10, 2009 | 11:30 AM
Makiko, I've experienced these things too - I definitely received a great deal of sympathy when I mentioned I took the bus. Taking the bus is streotypically and inacurrately considered something only for people who do not have other means. Being the proponent of all the advantages of public transportation that I am, I would definitely encourage you to explore your options!
1 0
REPLY
April 10, 2009 | 11:31 AM
William - you and and I are on the same page. Thank you!
1 0
REPLY
April 10, 2009 | 1:59 PM
Great job. After hearing what you said last night and after reading your article, I may actually take a bus to see what it is like. Again, Great Job.
2 0
REPLY
April 10, 2009 | 2:50 PM
We suggest taking a ride on the wild side (south sac, oak park, franklin, meadowview) and not the lilly white suburbs in order to keep it real!
1 0
REPLY
edited on  April 10, 2009 | 3:49 PM
It's easy to say stuff like this when you have options. Yes, Regional Transit works well during the work week at working business hours. Especially commuting to and/or from the more dense parts of town.

But for those that have no choice (and do not live in the midtown/downtown area!) it is not that easy. Try waiting for the 82 at CSUS on a Saturday evening in the middle of February. I did this shit for years and it is not as fun as you are misleading others to believe. A journey that would have taken 10 mins tops in a car can take more than an hour. From waiting for a late bus in the rain with it's limited weekend schedule, to waiting for the connecting bus and the final trudge home through cold, wet, muddy, dimly-lit streets. All alongside cars that constantly splash you just for kicks. And if that first bus is late, you gotta wait almost an hour for your connecting bus.

I have not ridden an RT bus in years and I do not miss it.
1 0
REPLY
April 10, 2009 | 3:55 PM
Templar: I have done both. In the early 1990s I did not have car, lived in Citrus Heights, and used the bus and light rail to get to work downtown, a trip that normally took about an hour. It was not particularly fast nor convenient, but if I planned ahead I could get where I was going. After a few months, I got an opportunity to move to Midtown and jumped at it, which dramatically reduced my commute and made me a lot happier. The lesson here is not that public transit is bad, but that living long distances from one's workplace is bad.

Yes, public transit is far more efficient for shorter distances, and yes, service outside of main transit corridors (and business hours) can be spotty or downright nonexistent. Most of Sacramento is a city built for the automobile: a decentralized, amorphous low-density landscape based around feeder streets and cul-de-sacs instead of transit corridors and a permeable grid. In such a landscape, in many cases cars are the only practical alternative. Part of the solution is rebuilding cities the way we used to (the way that Midtown and Downtown still are) and part is expanding transit service to make off-hours travel more practical, and more comfortable, for everyone.

The point is that Regional Transit does some things well, even if it doesn't do everything well. Nobody here claims it is perfect.
1 0
REPLY
April 10, 2009 | 11:13 PM
Templar - I don't feel I am misleading others in my analysis - it is my opinion of why I enjoy taking the bus and my attempt to dispell some of the negative steretypes RT and the drivers receive for circumstances over which they have no control - such as times and destinations. I have, in fact, experienced just the situation you described, and it was in February on a weekend, in fact, so RT is not without it's inconveniences, it's just that I choose to deal with the inconveniences because I feel that for me, the benefits outweigh them most of the time. I'm aware of the schedules and how long I will need to wait before I take a bus, and how long it is for a connecting bus if I miss a bus, so I come prepared - in fact I carry the timetable around with me - or I choose an alternate method of transportation. There are days when even my commute to work takes me at least 1/2 hour longer than it would have if I had driven, but again, it's a choice because in that 1/2 hour I might read, or meet someone new.

William, very well stated - thank you!
0 0
REPLY
edited on  April 11, 2009 | 8:54 AM
Angela and William, I didn't mean to offend anyone and I sincerely apologize if I have done so.

Like most other people, I have had good experiences as well as bad on RT buses. But Angela painted such a rosy picture, I felt like I had to present a different view. Again no offense intended.

But after my experiences, I cannot envision a situation in which I would choose to ride the RT bus instead of drive.

Light Rail otoh is ok... well except between the hours of 11 am and 3pm and after 8pm :)
0 0
REPLY
April 12, 2009 | 12:55 AM
Hi Templar - I am never offended by an opposing point of view, and in fact expected it when I wrote this piece. I know that many people have had bad experiences on RT (all my rides on RT have not been perfect, and some areas are very challenging to get to), so my story was an attempt to point out the finer attributes of the system rather than focusing on the problems. There's so much of that already, I thought I'd let people know that we actually do have a decent system here. My only concern was the word misleading, since that was never my intent, only to show people there's a different side to the system that doesn't receive enough appreciation for what it is. Thanks for clarifying, and for sharing your opinion - it's always welcome and as I understand it, that's what this venue is for!
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background