STORYLINE Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

1 of 2
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 2
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image

County supervisors will discuss the future of regional parks on Tuesday after hearing recommendations from a local group trying to rescue the parks from extinction.

The Grassroots Working Group (GWG), an independent citizen-volunteer group, was formed in 2010 to explore ways to keep area parks open without further straining the county budget.

“We consider the current condition of the County Regional Parks Department to be beyond critical,” wrote Charlea Moore, an Elverta resident and Grassroots Working Group member, in a letter to the Board of Supervisors.

“Something must be done very soon in order to rescue our regional parks and open space system, or the result will be an enormous loss for the entire region,” Moore said.

At the May 24 Board of Supervisors meeting, GWG recommended creating a new regional parks district that would be run by an elected seven-member panel instead of the Board of Supervisors.

“Our ultimate goal is to have a viable, stable, long-term funding and governance solution to rescue our parks and open spaces,” said Warren Truitt, president of the Save the American River Association, the lead organization of the Grassroots Working Group.

Since the current supervisors have many “competing demands” on their time and resources, having an independently elected board of directors would create a more accountable governance structure with park issues as “the only agenda of the new agency,” according to the GWG executive summary report.

County staff reports indicate the proposed new parks district would be financed by existing revenue sources, a county contribution and a one tenth of one percent sales tax increase.

An increase in sales tax to fund the new district requires taxpayer approval, however.

The Sacramento County Taxpayers League responded to the GWG recommendations in May with a letter opposing any tax increase and urged the Board of Supervisors to not allow the measure to go before the voters.

“Our local economy and your constituents continue to suffer from a sky high unemployment rate and significantly reduced incomes,” representatives wrote in the letter. “Now is the worst possible time to further burden your constituents with higher taxes.”

According to the Taxpayers League letter, although the GWG proposal was “motivated by good intentions,” it was poorly conceived.

Taxpayers League Executive Director Bob Blymyer said Monday the county needs to get rid of its deficit and reduce spending to a sustainable level before considering a tax increase.

“On the surface, (the GWG proposal) sounds pretty good,” Blymyer said. “But, until there is a dedicated funding mechanism that the Board of Supervisors can buy into, it isn’t a workable proposal.”

Blymyer said a more sensible approach would be the formation of a park district that covers the entire region.

“City, county, Elk Grove, Rancho Cordova – (We should) have them all under one umbrella,” Blymyer said. “There could be significant financial savings from an umbrella organization.”

Interim County Executive Steve Szalay and Robert Leonard, Municipal Services Agency administrator, will present a report of their review of the GWG proposal along with staff recommendations for further action at the Board of Supervisors meeting Tuesday.

The Board of Supervisors meets various Tuesdays and Wednesdays each month at the County Administration office, 700 H St

Melissa Corker is a Staff Reporter with The Sacramento Press. Follow her on Twitter @MelissaCorker.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

July 18, 2011 | 10:25 PM
Any local regional parks district should be modeled after the very successful East Bay Regional Park District (Alameda and Contra Costa Counties). Although EB Parks is only successful because voters gave it adequate funding (http://www.ebparks.org/ww) and specific mandates. If something similar ever came about in Sacramento, I would hope it eventually comprised of El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo and Yuba Counties (a la SACOG). That would truly be a Sacramento Regional Park District.
3 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background