STORYLINE The Future of News

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

The future of news, part 2, one week of The Bee

by Geoff Samek, published on March 30, 2009 at 8:20 AM

Storyline: The Future of News RSS Feed

1 of 2
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 2
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image

As it is today, could the Sacramento Press replace The Sacramento Bee? In a word, no. However, one word is far from the full story.

In my last installment of this storyline, I outlined the course I was taking in discussing the future of news, with an emphasis paid to local content, since that is what this publication focuses on. Over the course of the last week, I embarked on the rather epic and tedious task of quantifying exactly what is in a week's worth of The Bee.

In order to do this, I purchased a copy each day and as meticulously as possible recorded how many pieces of content The Bee wrote versus content drawn from other publications, and of that content, how much of it was local. The full results of that survey can be found in the article posted previous to this one.

Overall, it is quite impressive how much content that a major daily can put together on any given day of the week. The Bee covers a wide range of subjects and a substantial geographic area. However, it has good days and it has bad days.

If you simply looked at a Monday paper, it would appear that in terms of sheer quantity, The Bee does not necessarily produce more local content than a publication the size of the Sacramento Press. Last Monday, The Bee produced approximately 16 original articles about our region. It produced another 11 about matters beyond the region and filled nearly 62% of its editorial space with content from other publications.

But Monday is far from the full picture, which is why I chose to dissect one week's worth of content and not just one day. On Tuesday, The Bee produced nearly double that many local original pieces, and on Friday nearly 40%, or 49 of 124 pieces, of The Bee was original local content.

If we were to lose that much content today, I think it would be a great loss to the community. However the numbers found in the survey I did are not impossible to achieve with a citizen journalism effort, whose base is the whole of the Sacramento region.

Much of what is reported locally is not muckraking, or in-depth investigative journalism. Much of it can be found in the crime logs and brief digests of events in the region. These are topics which citizen journalists can not only report with equal ability, but with greater interest and passion.

While I am humbled at the monumental effort it takes to put together The Bee every day, and admire the work that goes into it, I do not think it is a resource that is impossible to replicate.

This may even be more the case as of this week. That is because, as David Watts Barton reported here, many of the names I saw last week when compiling my survey will no longer be names I see in the paper, due to layoffs at The Bee. So perhaps last week’s effort is a bit of historical trivia. Time will tell, just as it will confirm my point of view or disprove it.

Please take a close look at the survey and let me know what you think of the results below.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

March 30, 2009 | 8:25 AM
You guys need a copy editor.
3 0
REPLY
March 30, 2009 | 8:41 AM
We do in fact have copy editors. In my haste to post this I posted the non edited version. The edited version will be up shortly.

Thank you for keeping us honest and the quality of our publication higher.
2 0
REPLY
March 30, 2009 | 11:21 AM
I hope you'll write about the people who, as far as I can tell, are going to be the real losers in the media transformation, namely, the professional writers, journalists, photographers, et al who currently make a living working at old media jobs. Do you see a future where the "content providers" will eventually be able to profit from their labor?
2 0
REPLY
March 30, 2009 | 11:36 AM
I disagree that professional writers are the "real losers" here. I think those who work in printing and distribution are set to lose the most.
0 0
REPLY
March 30, 2009 | 11:53 AM
I think you should let the Bee's dust settle for a week or two and then do this again and see if they are maintaining local content or buying in more from other sources to cover layoffs.
1 0
REPLY
March 30, 2009 | 12:09 PM
Sounds like a good plan.
1 0
REPLY
March 30, 2009 | 12:14 PM
We thinks the Bee aint as good 'cos its so thin it aint much for blankits like befor. Me an Big Juicy still wad er up to stuff in our shoes! Fills em out real nice. We like the horoscope to. Pursonally, Sakamento Press is number one!!!
2 0
REPLY
March 30, 2009 | 1:31 PM
As a long time critic of the Bee, I have to say that they have been recently publishing great articles. I like what they did on the CPS story..and what they recently printed about how politicians are purchased by corporations...all great stuff...maybe they are learning from their past mistakes...

I will be convinced they are taking a new path when they lay off Ryan Lillis...I'm sick of his puff pieces on city politics; replace him with an independent critical thinker.

The future of news is the internet...we need more sites like the Sacramento Press. Get the information out...transparency and sunshine is what corruption fears.
2 1
REPLY
March 30, 2009 | 3:15 PM
In looking at the content, you need to appreciate the weekday nature of reporting. What you see Monday was produced by the skeleton weekend staff or held over from the week before. Tuesday through Saturday are the weekday news and that's where the staff works. Sunday content is generally produced ahead of time. Features goes to bed on Thursday (or did when I worked at The Bee), Forum goes to bed Friday afternoon.
0 0
REPLY
March 30, 2009 | 8:29 PM
That is exactly my understanding of the results of my survey. Thank you for an insightful clarification.

As Tony mentioned, it will be interesting to see if the content will be close to the same 2 weeks from now.
0 0
REPLY
March 30, 2009 | 9:40 PM
In my experience it's not feasible to provide local coverage for an area larger than a city. The differences between West Sacramento, Folsom, Elk Grove and Roseville for example are too great to provide blanket coverage. In order to compete locally the Bee needs to be local and not try and cover all of Superior California from 21st & Q.
3 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background