<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title type="text">Conversation on The Sacramento Press about: Extra funds for R Street improvement project</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/50826" />
  <subtitle>The R Street improvements currently under construction from 10th to 13th streets are getting a few more amenities, as construction left extra funds in an approximately $1 million $1.5 million federal grant allocated to the project.

The City Council unanimously voted Tuesday to approve 13 more pedestrian benches, 13 banners affixed to streetlights and a decorative arch that spans R Street at 10th Street and a pedestrian arch over the sidewalk on 12th Street and R Street, to be constructed by T...</subtitle>
  <dc:creator>mstewart22</dc:creator>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">By: TLeon</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/50874/The_project_recieved_a_SACOG_Community_Design_Grant_in_2008_for_46_Million_The_SACOG_was_comprised_" />
    <author>
      <name>TLeon</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-50874</id>
    <updated>2011-05-20T04:37:55Z</updated>
    <published>2011-05-20T04:37:55Z</published>
    <content type="text">The project recieved a SACOG Community Design Grant in 2008 for $4.6 Million.  The SACOG was comprised of roughly $4.1Million of Federal funds   The federal money was TEA21 funding meant for streetscape enhancements.  After the low bid submitted by Teichert construction, the project had roughly $1.5 Million left over that would have been returned to SACOG/Feds if not used.  The CIty, CADA, and the Community quickly came up with additional improvements for the project.  The project will still return almost $1.0 Million in unused Grant funds.  The Federal Earmark from 2005 was used for a different segment of the project.</content>
    <dc:creator>TLeon</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-05-20T04:37:55Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">By: Brandon Darnell</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/50850/The_15_million_in_the_story_is_a_reference_to_that_earmark_you_mentioned_The_money_for_these_improv" />
    <author>
      <name>Brandon Darnell</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-50850</id>
    <updated>2011-05-19T18:48:31Z</updated>
    <published>2011-05-19T18:48:31Z</published>
    <content type="text">The $1.5 million in the story is a reference to that earmark you mentioned. The money for these improvements is not a new grant, but funds already allotted to the project.</content>
    <dc:creator>Brandon Darnell</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-05-19T18:48:31Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">By: Ali Tabatabai</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/50845/I_believe_the_original_funding_for_the_project_is_part_of_a_federal_earmark_Im_not_clear_as_to_whet" />
    <author>
      <name>Ali Tabatabai</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-50845</id>
    <updated>2011-05-19T18:25:09Z</updated>
    <published>2011-05-19T18:25:09Z</published>
    <content type="text">I believe the original funding for the project is part of a federal earmark.  I'm not clear as to whether the 1.5 million is a new grant, or money in the earmark  that wasn't used yet and is now being freed up to add these "icing on the cake" improvements.   

Can someone clear that up?</content>
    <dc:creator>Ali Tabatabai</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-05-19T18:25:09Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">By: cogmeyer</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.sacramentopress.com/comment/50811/Happy_to_see_some_good_construction_management_keeping_the_project_on_schedue_and_even_some_reserve" />
    <author>
      <name>cogmeyer</name>
    </author>
    <id>comment-50811</id>
    <updated>2011-05-19T16:16:22Z</updated>
    <published>2011-05-19T16:16:22Z</published>
    <content type="text">Happy to see some good construction management keeping the project on schedue and even some reserve money leftover for some bonus work.&#xD;
&#xD;
It is still amazing though that federal money would be involved in such an incredibly local/regional project as this.</content>
    <dc:creator>cogmeyer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-05-19T16:16:22Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

