STORYLINE Sacramento City Hall / Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

1 of 2
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 2
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image

Jurors are deliberating in federal court whether homeless citizens’ belongings were illegally taken and thrown away by Sacramento police officers between August 2005 and the present.

The trial, which centers on homeless people’s constitutional rights and their personal belongings, began May 9 at the Sacramento Federal Courthouse at 501 I St.

Plaintiffs attorney Mark Merin represented Linda McKinley, who was homeless in the past, and a group of homeless people in the class-action case against the city of Sacramento, according to court documents.

Merin is a supporter of the Safe Ground group, which presses Sacramento city leaders to designate land for homeless people to live. 

In closing arguments on Wednesday, Merin claimed that city police officers have violated the U.S. Constitution by throwing out homeless citizens’ personal items.

“Nobody got their property back because it was tossed away,” Merin said.

Specifically, Merin has accused the city of violating the 14th Amendment by not giving homeless people sufficient warning that their belongings would be trashed. He also contends that the city has taken homeless citizens’ items in an “unreasonable search and seizure” manner that violates the Fourth Amendment.

Merin claimed in an April 1 court document that the police have taken away and thrown out homeless people’s belongings such as tents, bedding, clothing and medication. Photos and an urn with ashes have also been taken by police, he claimed in the document.

Police officers take items from the homeless when they enforce the city’s ban on overnight camping, he further claimed.

In Judge Morrison England’s courtroom Wednesday, Merin referred to the homeless campground that formed in 2009 and gained immense international media exposure. 

“Tent City developed because there was no place for homeless people to go,” Merin said.

Meanwhile, the city of Sacramento disputes Merin’s claims.

“We don’t feel we violated any of the homeless individuals’ constitutional rights,” Senior Deputy City Attorney Chance Trimm said outside the courtroom.

The city claims that it did not throw out homeless people’s belongings. “Assuming any camping paraphernalia is taken from violators of the city’s camping ordinances, such property is booked and maintained at an evidence collection location by the Sacramento Police Department,” Trimm wrote in an April 1 court brief.

Merin wants the jury to order the city to give back homeless people’s personal items, according to court documents. The plaintiffs also want a court order against the city, and for the city to pay damages and attorney fees.

The Sacramento Press will report on the jury’s verdict when it becomes available. 

Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press. 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

May 18, 2011 | 6:44 PM
Merin's a classic poverty pimp. He doesn't even have the shame to not pose with the expensive art he's been able to purchase making money perpetuating other people's misery.
4 2
REPLY
May 20, 2011 | 1:16 PM
I hear he owns a car, too. And, and, a flat screen tv. Oh, and he's got watch, too.
2 0
REPLY
May 19, 2011 | 9:30 AM
One stone at a time, the well intentioned pave the road out of California for those capable of supporting it.
4 1
REPLY
May 20, 2011 | 1:44 PM
Sacramento has gotten a lot of national press for our tent cities. How can we better treat our homeless population?
1 3
REPLY
May 22, 2011 | 4:50 PM
Perhaps housing is the answer?
0 1
REPLY
May 26, 2011 | 9:39 AM
If you house the homeless population we have at present, within a week there will be twice as many. It's a big State in a big country. Sacramento already seems to be the favored spot for the homeless - let's not make it any worse by inviting more to come and enjoy the great benefits at Sacramento taxpayer's expense.... and don't forget two ongoing projects that aim to provide single occupancy homes for the astonishing price of just $300,000 each.
2 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background