STORYLINE City Budget

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

1 of 3
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 3
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image

More than 350 jobs, including those of 80 sworn police officers, could be cut to balance the city’s budget, Interim City Manager Bill Edgar said Friday.

The city manager’s office released recommendations Friday on how to resolve a $39 million budget gap. The proposal released by the city is not set in stone: The City Council is responsible for making final budget decisions.

“This is the budget that everyone has dreaded,” Edgar said. “(This is) the budget where the chickens come home to roost.”

The city manager’s office proposes cutting 294 positions. In addition, Edgar said he is recommending that the City Council cut about 60 more positions to privatize maintenance of city golf courses.

In the coming weeks, representatives for the city’s unions are expected to negotiate with city officials over the planned budget cuts.

The proposed budget recommends that the City Council lay off 80 of the city’s 701 sworn police officers. The city manager’s proposal also suggests laying off about 70 civilian workers in the Police Department and cutting 18 vacant positions for sworn police officers.

Detective Mark Tyndale, vice president of the Sacramento Police Officers Association, said the union’s members are upset, scared and “very angry” about the proposed cuts to the department.

The union made concessions on raises in 2009 that resulted in $13 million in savings for the city, he said.

“We have stepped up, and we have given,” he said.

SPOA’s view is that the city unfairly gave raises to a few top city officials recently.

Tyndale also argues the city mismanaged money by paying raises to members of another city union, Local 39, after negotiations fell apart between Local 39 and the city in 2009.

(However, it should be noted that Local 39 members suffered layoffs as a result of the failed negotiations with the city in 2009. Local 39 Director of Public Employees Joan Bryant, who represents city workers that are not in the public safety field, recently argued that the city unfairly favors public safety workers on retirement benefits.)

Despite Tyndale’s anger over the proposed budget, he said SPOA will continue to “have a dialogue with city management” on the budget.

“We expect to be treated fairly by them,” Tyndale said.

The proposed cuts will reduce police services, said department spokesman Sgt. Norm Leong.

“It will have impacts to crime and to the service level we’re providing,” he said.

In one of many examples, Leong said the department would not be able to respond in person to property crimes like theft and home burglaries if there are no suspects on the scene. “We’re not coming out,” he said.

However, if there are suspects present, the department would respond, he said.

Sacramento City Councilman Darrell Fong, who retired from the Police Department in 2009 after a 30-year career there, said no officers were laid off during his tenure with the department.

“I’m really concerned about the cuts to public safety,” he said.

Meanwhile, the Fire Department also faces major cuts in the proposed budget. There are “whole communities that aren’t going to have EMS or fire response,” said Jaymes Butler of Sacramento Area Firefighters Local 522. “They’ll have to pull from another community.”

The numbers of layoffs and the cuts to services for the fire department are still unclear because the city has been selected to receive a $5.6 million grant earmarked for fire services.

However, Butler estimated that the cuts would result in the following actual layoffs: 14 captains, nine engineers, 35 firefighters and seven firefighter/paramedics.

Positions are different from actual layoffs, because the city sometimes saves money by cutting vacant positions.

However, Edgar said he doesn’t expect the number of positions – more than 350 – to differ much from actual layoffs.

“I think it’s fair to say that most of (the positions) are filled at this point,” he said.

The city budget document released Friday projects that the city will continue to face budget gaps until fiscal year 2015/2016. The gap for fiscal year 2012/2013 is $11.7 million and is expected to rise to $22.9 million in fiscal year 2013/2014. In fiscal year 2014/2015, the city expects to be $18 million in the hole. The gap drops to a $13 million deficit predicted in fiscal year 2015/2016.

Read the full text of the proposed budget here.

Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press. 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

April 30, 2011 | 1:23 PM
If the council has to cut another $65 million dollars from it's budget over the next 5 years the citizens of Sacramento are going to be living in a much more dangerous and dirty city. Our roads and infrastructure are nearing the end of their live cycles. It going to take billions to maintain/repair/or replace them. Our parks are going to be abandoned,and you can kiss "the claw" goodbye. Police response time will double or worse. Fire station brown outs will go up from the currently proposed 6. This will have a rippling effect, because property values will continue to drop, and in turn so will property taxes revenues.

I want to say this is as nice of a way possible, but the fact that we're more concerned, as a city,with basketball teams that this budget problem, troubles me. We need to decide what kind of a town we want to live in, what we're willing to go without to make sure key services are maintained, and what our clear path is out of this mess.

I say all of that while whole-hearting pledging to do whatever I can to help. I participate in civic volunteer efforts and beg anyone reading this comment to do the same. Give a few hours a month to any organization that makes you feel comfortable and productive. We cannot rely on government alone to make Sacramento a great place to live in for our children. We must each make it our personal responsibility.
3 0
REPLY
April 30, 2011 | 6:46 PM
Volunteering is nice, but volunteer police and firefighters may not be the way to go. I realize the phrase "tax increase" is not particularly popular these days, but it appears that we actually have to raise taxes in order to get out of this particular mess. People can hem and haw all they want, but you just can't get around that fact.
1 1
REPLY
April 30, 2011 | 9:15 PM
I would agree that tax revenues need to increase, because as property taxes decline to levels not seen since 2001, the population continues to increase and the demand for city services does the same.

Fiscal restraint during this crisis is absolutely necessary. The city's obligation to it's employees and their entitlement is a larger monetary figure than what is spent on actual services by far. If the council cannot continue to ensure that Sacramento is a "full-service" city, they risk losing the faith of their constituents.

Mr. Burg, I love this city, as I'm sure you do. I would live to work with you on content in the future. I hope one day we can collaborate.
0 0
REPLY
April 30, 2011 | 9:55 PM
There's a lot of fat that could go before tax increases are necessary. Make police and firefighters contribute to their retirements as other city employees do and that would go a long way toward solving the problems. Quit giving money to developers and focus on public safety first and this city would be fine. Also, quite worrying about an arena for billionaires and millionaires and quit harassing small businesses in this city.
3 2
REPLY
May 2, 2011 | 6:45 AM
Time to trim unneeded upper management. You have to cut where the cost is the hightest.
1 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background