STORYLINE Homelessness

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images

Continued from Part 2

Life in the transitional living program was not what I had expected it to be. I lived in this transitional housing program for two years before finally being able to generate enough income to rent my own apartment. During my two years living there, I saw that the staff did nothing to address the issues of its clients' continual drug and alcohol misuse, and general neglect to follow rules. I was virtually the only person using the program for its intended purpose.

I was removed from the first house to another because the clients there were so uncomfortable living with me, being a drug and alcohol free person half their age, with knowledge of their typical day to day activities including regular drug and alcohol misuse and overall neglect of personal and household responsibilities. They were expecting me to do as they did, which was get drunk and high and watch TV all day. I could not participate with them because I would have been subject to violating my probation and sent to jail.

Instead of doing what the others did, I occupied myself with landscaping the front and back yard, cleaning the scum that had built up on the kitchen floor over the years, checking in with my probation officer weekly whether they requested to see me or not, consistently meeting probation requirements, including getting court slips signed, etc, along with the daily responsibilities of being a resident.

I also had time to expunge my long criminal record of seemingly endless trespassing, loitering, vagrancy, panhandling and 'illegal camping' charges I had accumulated over the years. I did all these things mainly to occupy my time to keep me from violating my probation and re-entering the jail system. If it were not for that motivator, I may have just kicked it on the couch smoking pot, watching TV and arguing with rest of them.

As the other clients saw it though, I was seemingly not like them, and they collectively persuaded the staff to move me to a different house. The staff agreed that it would be best to move me, but the staff's reasoning was not because I wasn't complying with their rules. It was because they had not experienced having a compliant resident, and therefore had no idea what to do in this situation.

All they knew was that it was obviously causing them problems to have one compliant resident living in their transition house with nine others who were non-compliant. It was easier for the program staff to house a full clientel of non-compliant residents. The program staff could then allow the clients do whatever. Anytime the staff were questioned, they would respond that all is in compliance, and that would be the end of it.

The clients got what they wanted; a place to do whatever without being told otherwise, and the staff got what they wanted, space to not be bothered with anything that had to do with them actually working or doing their job.

It was obvious they did not see me or anyone like me coming. I was actually putting this homeless service provider staff to work, as most of the staff seemed to be used to doing nothing other than waiting for their next paycheck to arrive. (Interestingly enough, during a mandatory house meeting one week, a staff person facilitating one of the meetings told us residents of how the organization was misappropriating huge amounts of money, and lining their pockets with it. This would not surprise me.)
 

Continue to Part 4

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

March 8, 2011 | 8:08 PM
I can totally relate to this article. When i was homeless and living in a shelter or transitional housing there were only three of us who did not drink and/or do drugs. it was very uncomfortable and I tried to get back on my feet as soon as I could. This shelter housed people with a mental illness and/ or substance abuse issues. I was able to get an apartment after about five months but then soon after had a psychotic break and ended up in a psychiatric hospital...I am currently back in my own apartment and doing well...thank goodness. I am looking forward to your future articles, Sonny!
5 0
REPLY
March 8, 2011 | 8:14 PM
I wonder if we were in the same housing program!
0 0
REPLY
March 8, 2011 | 8:45 PM
The program was called AB34 I believe...Senator Darrell Steinberg introduced the bill. i met with him. I do believe however that if this program helped one person to become self reliant and / or sober it is worth tax payers money. Afterall, you can't help those who don't help themselves and who don't take advantage of opportunites that may better their situation...But for those who benefited from the program such as you and I it was fortunate that the program existed otherwise I would have been on the street and who knows what would have happened to me. During the five months that I was in the program I started my own organization SHER Someone Hears Everybody's Rights...and began to write letters to government officials on ways to improve our mental health system. Well, one day I woke up only to find my typewriter, pens and paper thrown on the floor. I did not let this deter me because eleven years later I am still wriitng my letters. Don't let anything or anyone stand in your way of achieving your goals. By you writing this article you are helping many people!!
4 0
REPLY
March 8, 2011 | 9:59 PM
You are so right! Thanks for showing me that. I can be ungrateful at times.

I only wish these programs were better designed so that those who come after us don't go through what we had to go through. People deserve better than that!
1 0
REPLY
edited on  March 10, 2011 | 11:25 AM
You are absolutely right that people deserve better. As I pointed out in your prior article such programs can be better designed, there are workable models. and they should be better and those responsible for continuing the status quo should be held accountable by denying future funding.

BUT these Providers are a very powerful political block statewide and no elected official at any level dares oppose them as Willie Brown found out when he was mayor of SF. I recommend all read Chapter 11, Gamed by the System, from his book "Basic Brown, My Life and Our Times." The core problem is that no one has ever found a way to fund providers more for reducing the homeless population that they say they help. The reality for them is that fewer homeless clients means less funding, so there is no incentive for them other than the status quo. A sad lesson learned from serving on the Homeless Board.
4 0
REPLY
March 9, 2011 | 5:23 PM
Thank you for the information you provide. That is shocking to me! At the same time it makes sense. Its no wonder I, and so many other homeless, have had SO much trouble getting help from these homeless services.

I have always, and even now, shared skepticism with those who doubt the service provider system and believe corruption exists within it at a higher level.

I have worked for the same service provider organization 4.5 years, and am just learning of this strong contempt people have for homeless only since I've come to this Sac Press site in the last two weeks. It is outrageous!!

Also, during my near 5 years working where I'm at, I am the only person there who has ever eaten out of a dumpster, been arrested for panhandling, been arrested for peeing in public because homeless aren't allowed to use public bathrooms unless they are a customer, and the list goes on.

Though I am the only one with first hand experience with the struggles of homelessness, the struggles of navigating through the homeless services, and experienced entry from homelessness into a home and maintained home life for just over 10 years, I am the lowest paid, lowest ranked, and under acknowledged employee.

I have received a total of one 50 cent raise in the entire 4.5 years working there, make below poverty level income, and know more about homelessness, how to navigate through the service provider systems, and recovery from homeless life than any other employee at this organization.

So, from my point of view, there is something very wrong with this system, and it needs a complete overhaul.

1 0
REPLY
March 10, 2011 | 9:59 AM
Dale, I absolutely agree with your comment. Heck, big fish swallows little fish therefore with many ills of society the money is in keeping the disease NOT bringing the cure.
2 0
REPLY
March 9, 2011 | 11:47 AM
Wow thanks for sharing that Sonny!
1 0
REPLY
March 9, 2011 | 4:52 PM
Thank you for taking the time to read it.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background