STORYLINE Kings Headcourters

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Kings Conspiracy - Part 1

by Cemal Richards, published on January 1, 2011 at 12:22 PM

Storyline: Kings Headcourters RSS Feed

1 of 4
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 4
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image

I've been a Kings fan for a long time, and I never had a chance to attend regular-season games until I started going to college. I frequently watched Kings games on local TV and saw many calls that would make you scratch your head more times than a kid with lice. Many of those calls took me back to the 2002 Western Conference Finals where the Kings were royally robbed of the championship. After attending many games last year and becoming a first time season ticket holder this year, I've come to see too many foul calls that are blatantly wrong and unjustified. As I look around at all the obstacles that the Kings organization is facing thus far, I can't help but believe that there is some conspiracy going around to get the Kings moved out of Sacramento. Now don't get scared yet, but be aware of everything that happens from this time going forward, because this article is to inform all Kings fans of the smoke and mirrors that's been going around to keep you from seeing what's really happening.

A little over a month ago, I attended the Kings and Bulls game with a friend of mine, and the contest was going really well until the referees started calling ridiculous fouls on DeMarcus Cousins, Jason Thompson and Tyreke Evans. They even hit Beno Udrih with a foul that I felt was unnecessary. On the other hand, the Bulls didn't even get called for as many fouls that the Kings did, and they were fouling every time a white uniform drove to the basket, but that’s been common when attending a Kings game. I won't elaborate too much on this night, but as the game came to a close, I started getting the idea that maybe all this foul stuff is being done on purpose to lure the fans away from Arco so that the team can find a new home. 

This past summer, Arco representatives informed the Maloofs that they were not going to renew the naming rights for the Sacramento Sports Arena. This came at a very bad time for a small-market team like the Kings because naming rights bring in revenue, and seeing that Arco hasn't been packed lately, that money is desperately needed. I feel that this decision made the Maloofs angry, and they started contemplating a move even though they said they would remain faithful to the city of Sacramento. Furthermore, George Maloof took a trip to Seattle this past summer as well to speak with former Supersonics President Wally Walker.  The Seattle Post-Intelligencer cites that George claimed to have spoken specifically on why Seattle was unable to build a new arena and ultimately moved them out of town. I have my doubts about this claim because the Maloofs approved of the Sonics’ move with 27 other teams three years ago. 

Now those are just a few situations to keep in mind, but what about that nice new shiny arena? Back in 2006, the Maloofs met with city and county officials to finalize an agreement on a new facility that would be built in the downtown railyard. City & county officials said they would split the cost of the arena with the Maloofs, but that wasn't acceptable. The deal enraged both Joe & Gavin Maloof, and they stormed out the building, which was reported by the Sacramento Bee. Then later on, they put a tax increase proposal on the fall election ballot, which became known as measures Q and R, to raise taxes by a quarter cent to pay for a new arena. Both measures were overwhelmingly rejected by voters, and this became the beginning of the Maloofs considering relocation. However, the Maloofs would continue to pursue new avenues in getting an arena built in Sacramento, but that was only because there weren't any other viable areas to move to in that span of time. Cal Expo attempted to construct a blueprint of fitting an arena on its fairgrounds, but that idea was too farfetched, because the housing market was plummeting around that time, and local funding was nowhere to be found.

Finally, there seemed to be light at the end of the tunnel when Mayor Kevin Johnson was voted into office and started the Sacramento First Task Force. David Stern even came out to Sacramento himself to talk to the mayor about the arena issue. But even though six developers came to the table with ideas for a new arena, only one could be chosen.  That “one” happened to be the Land Swap Proposal, seeing that it was backed by David Stern and the NBA, and that it seemed realistic with the funding and needs of each party involved. 

As time ticked away, it became less and less likely that this whole idea would pan out, and Cal Expo put the finishing touches on it when their representatives came to the conclusion that Arco Arena wasn't fit for a brand-new fairgrounds. Not only that, but David Stern informed the Maloofs and the task force that they would no longer be helping in any capacity with getting a new arena built. Now even though the mayor is continuing his pursuit of getting an arena built here, I feel that the Maloofs are livid from the decisions of the city and Cal Expo and have come to the end of the road with their efforts here in Sacramento. 

I feel that the Maloofs and David Stern are working together to have the Kings moved out of town because of this. As I look at the product on the floor, I don't really see any improvement, and I feel that Geoff Petrie and Paul Westphal are being told what to do as well in order to keep fans from supporting the team. The referees are also playing a huge part in it, calling fouls on whoever they feel just to screw us over. All this adds up to fans being uninterested in attending games and despising the direction management is going. Furthermore, when Stern isn't giving his support anymore for a particular market, that essentially means he's giving the green light to the owners to file for relocation. Similar examples of this would be the Grizzlies’ move to Memphis from Vancouver, the Hornets’ move from Charlotte to New Orleans, and the most recent disappointing move the Sonics made to Oklahoma City from Seattle. Stern didn't care one bit about either of those markets, because they weren't willing to provide the teams with new arenas, and that's exactly the case with the Kings. The NBA is all about making money, and it's likely that Sacramento hasn't been doing that for years now which makes me feel that they're setting the wheels in motion for a move.

Lastly, I would like to point out the new arena rumblings that were going around in Las Vegas this past summer. According to an article in the Las Vegas Sun, Chris Milam; the CEO of International Development Management LLC, was quoted as saying that they already had an NBA team under contract (read here). The city is putting all its efforts into building it on the Las Vegas Strip, and I already feel that this deal is in place for the Kings to move if the arena is approved by the county. The Maloofs own The Palms Casino and Hotel there, and much of their business activities are done in Sin City. What would be better than to have the Kings moved into a brand-spanking-new arena that would suit all their needs and generate income? All this makes me skeptical of what the Maloofs are really up to, and I hope it doesn't lead to the Kings bolting from town.

So don't let all the marketing schemes and talk deter you from seeing what could ultimately happen if an arena isn't built sooner rather than later.  I think the Maloofs want out of Sacramento, and it seems to me like it's trickling all the way down to the team. Just a couple weeks ago, Petrie said he had no talks with any other team about trading Jason Thompson, but Marc Stein from ESPN confirmed that he indeed tried to trade him to the Hawks for Jeff Teague. Now I hear Westphal is putting him into the starting lineup, but this is nothing more than a ploy to showcase his talents so that other teams will come calling. 

And speaking of Westphal, throughout most of the games this season he's used terrible rotations and hasn't gone with the guys who have been doing good for us in the beginning of games. A good example of this would be the Kings and Bulls game I mentioned earlier. Westphal never bothered to go back to the starting five of Head, Evans, Greene, Thompson and Dalembert, who were playing very energetically and executing on plays. Afterward, Westphal had the audacity to blame his players and call them guilty. This came off very fishy to fans, and it made me wonder what was truly going on.

I hate to say it, but I feel the team is being run terribly, and it's being done on purpose to sway fans away from Arco. These guys need more time to gel, but the Maloofs aren't having it, and it's all because of a bigger plan to move the team out of town in the near future. With all this being said, have no fear Kings fans, because this is just a warning. I highly suggest getting involved with the “Here We Stay” and “Keep the Kings in Sactown” movements, because these groups are trying to make extra efforts to keep our only professional sports team around.

Photos by Rob Small, David Alvarez, Marc Mclaughlin & Steven Chea

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

January 1, 2011 | 1:08 PM
So far for the 2010-2011 Kings season average attendance is actually up 150 people a game, not down (December 26th article on page 1A of the Bee by Tony Bizjak titled, "Sacramento Kings lack wins, but attendance is up.").
0 0
REPLY
January 1, 2011 | 4:54 PM
That's true Geoff but like I said, I'm a bit fishy of what the Maloofs are thinking. I'm in Vegas right now and they're about to break ground on a new sports complex called the Silver State Arena and I already know that they're looking into a possible move if an arena can't get done in Sac.
0 0
REPLY
Leo
Author thumbnail
January 1, 2011 | 1:09 PM
I am soooo sick of overpaid pro sports players, owners, and the crooked city and state officials who suck up to said players and owners. Here are some facts about pro sports. Unless you live in a household of 5 that makes in excess of $75,000 a year you couldn’t afford to go to a pro game of sport.
A doctor that can remove your heart and fix it makes maybe $300,000 a year. The base salary for a drafted NFL rookie in 2010 was $325,000, according USA Today. This base salary does not include signing or other bonuses, and is typically paid to the lowest draft choices on each team. The base salary also does not include other sources of income for players, such as speaking engagements and product endorsements. The base salary is the pre-bonus average for NFL rookies.
Rookies, players without any prior NBA experience, have the lowest minimum salary. For the 2010-2011 NBA season, rookies were guaranteed to make at least $473,604, while 10-year NBA veterans were guaranteed a minimum salary of $1,352,181. Minimum salary requirements increase for each year spent in the NBA. Thus, a player with one year of NBA experience is guaranteed to make more than the minimum an NBA rookie could earn, but less than a veteran with two.

I hope the Kings leave.
0 0
REPLY
January 1, 2011 | 4:55 PM
RIGHT ON LEO!!! I'm getting tired of it too. These guys got to start earning every penny of what they get and that starts by coming out and playing the hardest every night!
0 0
REPLY
January 3, 2011 | 12:18 PM
I thought that if an NBA team moved to Vegas that all the casinos would then have to take betting on NBA games off the table. Maybe I misunderstood that as only pertaining to the Palms if the Kings did make a move there. I feel that a move to Vegas would not work for any pro sports team let alone the Kings or an NBA franchise. The All Star Game was held there a few years ago and it was mostly a PR disaster from what I remember hearing and reading. Crime was a big issue but maybe it was isolated because of the magnitude of the event and the large amounts of fans that came to town because of the game.
0 0
REPLY
January 3, 2011 | 12:49 PM
You make some good points here Steve however, the NBA is about making money and if it's to move the Kings somewhere else to become a little more profitable, Stern will pull the trigger in a hot second.
0 1
REPLY
January 3, 2011 | 3:20 PM
The Kings have been run terribly from the 80' right up to the late 90's just like many other professional teams. Did the idea ever come to mind that maybe this recession and high unemployment in the Sacramento area might also have an effect on attendance? This recession is like nothing we have seen in the area for nearly 70 years. This is also a government town that is down sizing with the worst yet to come.

The Kings will leave town if the city doe's not get its act together and build a new arena ASAP. So far the Maloofs have heard talk about an arena for 10 years and there is nothing to show for it. If the Kings's leave, expect Arco Arena to shut it's doors because not enough revenue can be generated by the other 200+ events a year that happen there to break even... the Kings make Arco profitable and with out them it looses money.

After ten years of talk, I would not blame them if they did leave town. BTW, I would not believe anything about Las Vegas having a team under contract if they build an arena when the NBA is talking about eliminating teams. I would not be surprised if there was a lock out before the season ends. Read here: http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5715816
1 0
REPLY
edited on  January 3, 2011 | 10:09 PM
The Maloofs also are not as rich as they use to be, it's hard to build a good team when your
income is the KINGS.

The Maloofs at one time had massive "on paper wealth" which quickly disappeared in the downturn.

This is an approximate summary of what happened to the Maloof's wealth:

At peak
Wells Fargo $248mil (2002)
Beer Distributor $45mil (annual revenues $100mil, but no menton of offsetting expenses)
Palms $386mil (2008)
Kings $385mil (2007 value via Forbes)
-----------------
$1,064,000,000

Now
Wells Fargo $124mil (up from scary nadir of $39mil 18 months ago)
Beer Distributor SOLD
Palms $108mil (possible estimate from partner bankruptcy hearings)
Kings $305mil (2009 value via Forbes)
-----------------
$527,000,000

If accurate would mean that the Maloofs have lost half their wealth, and the
bulk of their stable equity is now in the Kings. The Kings now are the heart of
the empire until things pick up again economically -- there are no longer
outside resources to bail the Kings out or build arenas or that sort of thing.
The Kings have to become profitable and pay for themselves thus putting
the Maloofs on the same pay as you go footing as most NBA owners.
And also BTW making them far more vulnerable to monetary temptations from
competing cities.
1 0
REPLY
January 4, 2011 | 4:09 PM
Hey Hunnicutt, your comments are right on point. I definitely think that with the way the economy is right now, it's hurting the attendance along with the constant losing. The Kings have been playing well the last few games but it's gonna take a lot more than that to get the building packed again. I love how you outlined the Maloof's eonomic status. This is the reason why they decided to go young, they knew they wouldn't beable to afford veterans in the future.

As far as them being under contract by another city, I really feel that the Maloofs aren't putting their eggs in one basket. They're looking everywhere to see what city can be more profitable than Sacramento and I'll be mentioning a lot about that in my second article.
0 0
REPLY
January 3, 2011 | 3:47 PM
Wouldn't it make more sense for the Maloof's to simply move the team if they really wanted too? What would the point of the conspiracy be, just to anger Sacramentans and lower the value of their franchise and merchandise? If the Maloofs want to move the team, they gain nothing by doing it secretly or by conspiracy, but in fact seems like they would lose more.
0 0
REPLY
January 3, 2011 | 4:28 PM
It's because you have to kill off interest in order to rationalize it.

Someone noted above that attendance is up by 150/game this year. But have you noticed how many giveaways the Kings have had? It's really crazy. Every single game, they have one promotion or another.

But they're inflating their attendance, even at that. Did you watch last night? Upper-bowl was not even half-full, or even 1/3 full. Lower looked about half-full.

They official attendance was 12,500.

There's no way on earth there were 12,500 people at that game. 9,000 and 3,500 cockroaches, perhaps. But not 12,500 people.

I don't know why they do this, but it'd be easy for a journalist to research. Go to 5 games and count the people in each section (approximation). So they could find out how many seats each section has. After five games, you will find huge discrepancies.

Last year, an investigation found that the Kings had easily the lowest number of seats sold in the league, and the number sold vs the average attendance was huge; like, nearly 5,000/night. I'd never be able to find that article now (I'll give it a shot). They're comping a lot of charities, and discounting a lot of seats. I don't believe we're getting the full truth about their finances.

Sorry for the long answer.
0 0
REPLY
January 4, 2011 | 4:36 PM
Hey Stephen, Mike is right on point about the attendance with the Kings thus far but before I get into that I want to go a little further with why the Maloofs would try to hide any knowledge of wanting to move the team out of Sacramento. The Maloofs have a reputation to keep because they're billionaires and have many ties around the world and plenty with Kings Fans. To let it be known that they would move the team would hurt their image and their status amongst NBA owners. They don't want to be known as the owners who moved the Kings to Sin City.

For example, Clay Bennett who moved the Sonics from Seattle to OKC made it seem like he was gonna try and get an arena built in Seattle but knew he wasn't going to. It was just a ploy to make it seem like the City of Seattle were the bad guys. His intentions were to move the Sonics all along.

Now Stephen you said it would seem like the Maloofs would lose more and your right on the dot there and I'll be discussing that in my next article. Even though the fans aren't coming out they will when the team starts producing some wins because who wants to pay money to see someone lose. Your so right Mike about the attendance, I've attended about seven or eight games this season and ARCO looks thread bare everytime. The charity stuff is a fact because my friend invited me to the Kings and Bucks game a couple weeks ago and those tickets were given to him by his job. He went on to say that they had plenty of them... so you get my drift?
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background