STORYLINE WOMEN LEADERS WARN WHTMAN AND FIORINA TOO EXTREME FOR CALIFORNIA

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Women’s Rights and Access to Abortion and Birth Control at Stake November 2

by Raquel Simental, published on October 12, 2010 at 4:30 PM

Community Tags politics

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images

SACRAMENTO, CA — Representatives from more than 40 women rights organizations and women leaders throughout California held press conferences today in Sacramento, San Francisco and Los Angeles to urge women to vote on November 2nd to ensure women’s rights stay intact.

Women leaders at the Sacramento press conference were Janice Rocco, southwest regional director of California NOW; Genevieve Shiroma, SMUD board member; and Deborah Ortiz, Vice President of Public Affairs for California, Planned Parenthood Advocates Mar Monte and a former State Senator.

Voting this election cycle is crucial to ensure California women to continue to have access to abortion and family planning as well as pay equity, women’s rights in the workplace and equal marriage rights. California needs more women running for office, but women candidates like Meg Whitman, running for Governor, and Carly Fiorina, running for US Senator, have made it clear women’s rights are not a priority for them.

"If women don’t vote, we will risk losing many of the rights we have gained in the last 60 years,” said Deborah Ortiz, former State Senator and now Vice President of Public Affairs California for Planned Parenthood Advocates Mar Monte. “While we all support and want to elect more women, we must remember that we need to elect the right women.”

Several men from the Fiorina campaign and the California Republican Party stationed themselves outside the Sacramento press conference presumably to speak to women's issues.


A recent New York Times/CNN polls shows that women are still more likely to vote democratic, “This election cycle they may stay home, giving more of the decision-making to men by default."


"Women’s votes are critical in this election. A majority of women say they are more likely to vote if they can help defeat a candidate who doesn’t trust women to make their own reproductive health care decisions. We're here to talk about Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina’s attacks on a woman’s right to choose,” explained Janice Rocco, Southwest Regional Director of the National Organization for Women.


Fiorina, who has been endorsed by Sarah Palin, has said that if given the opportunity she would vote to overturn Roe v. Wade. Whitman has been silent on issues important to women such as protecting funding for family planning services.

The Coalition urged women to vote for the following candidates with proven history of working for women’s rights:

Governor: Jerry Brown

US Senator: Barbara Boxer

Lt. Governor: Gavin Newsom

Attorney General: Kalama Harris

Insurance Commissioner : Dave Jones


Below is a complete list of the coalition:

AFSCME District Council 36: Cheryl Parisi, Executive Director

Asian Pacific Islander Capitol Association: Melanie Ramil, President

California Alliance: Sara Nichols

California List: Bettina Duval, President

California Nurses Association California Young Democrats: Alissa Ko, President

CDP Arab American Caucus: Sarah Moussan, Communications Director

Commission Femenil/San Fernando Valley: Maria Reza, President

Consumer Attorneys of California: Lea Ann Tratten, Political Director

Democratic Party of Sacramento County: Ann Molander, Chair

Emerge America: Karen Middleton, President

Equality California (EQCA): Andrea Shorter & Lauren Custer

Fem Dem of Sacramento County

Feminist Majority: Katherine Spillar, Executive Vice President

L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center: Annie Goto, Boardmember

Los Angeles African-American Women’s PAC: Jacqueline Hawthorne, President

MANA: Ana Valdez, President

NARAL Pro-Choice California: Amy Everitt, State Director

National Organization for Women (NOW), CA: Patricia Bellasalma & Janice Rocco

National Women’s Political Caucus (NWPC): Lindsay Bubar

Planned Parenthood Advocates Mar Monte- Deborah Ortiz, VP Public Affairs for CA

Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California: Kathy Kneer, President

Dolores Huerta, leader in working poor and women’s rights

Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Action Fund: Heather Saunders Estes, President

Pro-Choice Students for Boxer: Miranda Peterson

Sacramento County Young Democrats: Lindsey Nitta, President

San Francisco Women's Political Action Committee: Heidi Sieck, President

SMUD: Genevieve Shiroma, Boardmember

SMUD: Nancy Bui, Boardmember

Stonewall Democrats of Sacramento County: Heather Minton, VP

ULTCW-SEIU: Laphonza Butler, President

Women’s Political Committee (WPC): Valerie Wisot, Co-Chair

Betsy Butler, Candidate for 53rd Assembly District

Board of Equalization, District 2: Betty Yee

Hon. Abbe Land, Councilmember, City of West Hollywood

Hon. Jan Perry, Los Angeles City Councilmember

Hon. Lindsey Horvath, Councilmember, City of West Hollywood

Hon. Wendy Greuel, Los Angeles City Controller

SEIU: Mary Hernandez, Political Director

SMUD: Genevieve Shiroma, Boardmember
 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

October 12, 2010 | 4:49 PM
Dear Droids: Roe v. Wade cannot be overturned or threatened by anything on the November ballot it was a Supreme Court decision.

Just so we clarify the issue here: Progressives want taxpayer funded abortions, and they are using scare tactics, telling women they will lose some kind of right, if they don't vote for a progressive-big-government-unionist. The irony is, only when it comes to abortion do the liberals want government to stay out of their lives.

Please name any other womans "right" at risk in this election, I'm dying to hear.
3 2
REPLY
October 13, 2010 | 10:34 AM
Well said. Even if the judicial monstrosity of Roe v. Wade was overturned (I am pro-choice, but it is a monstrosity because it reads into the constitution a non-existent "right"), the issue would get kicked back to the states. California went abortion on demand six years before Roe, under then Governor Reagan no less.
2 0
REPLY
October 14, 2010 | 5:56 AM
Republicans want taxpayer-funded governmental bureaucracies that go from town to town to make sure abortions don't happen. Just like gay marriage, the government should stay out of the public's right/choice to marry whomever and a woman's right to their bodily health (i.e. abortion).
0 3
REPLY
October 12, 2010 | 4:54 PM
How about family planning funding? That's definitely at risk. Meg Whitman said that New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie has the "roadmap" for the future. The same Chris Christie who cut family planning funds and as a result more than 130,000 women no longer have access to life saving breast and cervical cancer screenings, STD testing and treatment or birth control. That's too extreme for me. I'm voting for Jerry Brown and Barbara Boxer.
2 2
REPLY
edited on  October 12, 2010 | 5:01 PM
Please cite your statistics.

And I said "any other right" besides taxpayer funded abortions - some call this "family planning."
3 0
REPLY
October 13, 2010 | 10:36 AM
These "poor" women can gab all day on the cell phone, but can't get a checkup without a government program, for about the cost of one month of their cell phone bill? Spare me.
3 0
REPLY
edited on  October 12, 2010 | 8:07 PM
Wow... what a political plug.
So to advertise for a political candidate - I just write an "article" supporting whoever...
3 1
REPLY
kee
Author thumbnail
October 12, 2010 | 8:47 PM
Regarding taxpayer funded abortions: you can fund 18 years of welfare or a one-time abortion, you decide how you want your tax dollars spent. And don't even begin to say that abortion should be illegal because a) even if roe v. wade is overturned abortions won;t stop, they just beome unsafe for the women having them, and b) i'm sure i'm right when i say that most of the millions of people against abortion (taxpayer funded or not) are NOT opening their homes to the unwanted children that are born.
3 1
REPLY
edited on  October 14, 2010 | 8:08 AM
Please provide ANY reliable research that supports your proposition that aborted human beings would live a life on welfare if the government did not force taxpayers to pay to terminate their lives.

There is also a big difference between making abortion illegal and forcing tax payers, who may be morally and/or religiously opposed, to pay for it.

We are aborting 1.37 million humans per year who may have otherwise grown grow up to work and pay taxes - personally I'd rather have those people alive and working instead of having to import tens of millions of illegal aliens into the country to work and pay taxes to support our aging population.
3 0
REPLY
October 16, 2010 | 10:27 AM
I don't understand what makes Meg Whitman an enemy of women... she's pro-choice, right? I read above she supports cutting health services, is that the crux?
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background