STORYLINE Sacramento City Hall / Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

Opponents and supporters of a November ballot measure to cut utilities rates in the city released their fundraising statements Tuesday.

The new campaign statements provide information about money raised in recent months up to Sept. 30.

The statements showed that the Yes on Measure B campaign had raised more than six times the money of the opposing campaign in the past few months.

The No on Measure B campaign raised $6,000 by Sept. 30. Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 447 gave $5,000 to the campaign, while the Friends of Steve Cohn for City Council 2010 committee contributed the remaining $1,000.

The Campaign for Common Sense Utilities Rates, which backs Measure B, had raised $39,822 from Jan. 1 to Sept. 30. About $23,000 of that amount was contributions, and about $16,000 came from loans.

Protect Proposition 13, a Santa Monica-based group affiliated with the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, gave $2,500 to the campaign on Sept. 3.

The Sacramento-based California Apartment Association Political Action Committee contributed $3,600 to the Measure B supporters’ campaign in September.

Measure B would eliminate a 9.2 percent utilities rate hike and also link city utilities rates with the Consumer Price Index. The measure states that if the Consumer Price Index increases, then utilities rates could be increased.

The measure would also require the public to vote on utilities rate increases that are higher than the inflation rate.

Read about the debate over the measure here.

Photo by Brandon Darnell.

Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press. 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

October 6, 2010 | 9:42 AM
Just like Prop 13, this is a draconian knee jerk response. But it should pass and the city council has only itself to blame.

The Bee has said it would cripple to city's ability to fix its aging sewer and water system. The obvious question is what have they been doing with the extra money all along? In any event nothing prevents the city from coming back to the voters with specific projects and asking for the money to pay for them. Voters repeated passage of Measure A, transportation taxes have shown they will pay for needed projects.

I would suggest city staff start working on such a measure for the next election.
1 1
REPLY
October 6, 2010 | 10:33 AM
A grand jury found that the department of utilities had illegally diverted 10s of millions of utility dollars. They used your utility dollars to buy land for an automall!!!

Measure B simply requires that voters must approve annual rate increases that exceed the rate of inflation.

You call Measure B draconian. I call it common sense.
1 0
REPLY
edited on  October 14, 2010 | 10:42 AM
The Bee would have you all believe that B is Bad when all it does is takes away the open check book from the politicians and puts the voters back into control of their hard earned money. Voting no on B is like giving a child your credit card and saying CHARGE IT BABY!
I think we can all see what is going on here. If you give a mouse ( STEVE COHEN ) a piece of cheese today he will come back tomorrow and eat the whole wedge when you're not looking.
1 0
REPLY
October 6, 2010 | 6:14 PM
YES on B
1 1
REPLY
BRC
Author thumbnail
October 6, 2010 | 8:24 PM
Vote YES ON B and tell these politicians that we will not stand by watching their shell game any longer. They take illegal actions, cover them up and then expect us to just go along with another outrageous rate increase to support their inefficiency at running our government and the services that we pay for in these taxes.

They need to be sent a message about responsibility to the ones they are suppose to be representing. They have been given our trust and they seem to misuse and abuse that trust whenever they think they can get away with it.

VOTE YES on Measure B and let's put a stop to their shell game.
1 1
REPLY
October 6, 2010 | 8:53 PM
Enough with politicians raising "fees." Yes on Measure B!
1 1
REPLY
jlm
Author thumbnail
October 13, 2010 | 10:00 AM
"Texas oil companies Valero and Tesoro are two of the measure’s key financial backers. Other contributors to the Yes on 23 campaign include the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, a committee of the California Trucking Association and a Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association committee." from a previous SacPress article on Yes on 23.

"Protect Proposition 13, a Santa Monica-based group affiliated with the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, gave $2,500 to the [Yes on Measure B] campaign on Sept. 3."

Howard Jarvis....hmmmmm.....
0 1
REPLY
edited on  October 14, 2010 | 10:34 AM
You are so full of BULL! Texas Oil companies could care less about this measure. Are you living on another planet? Your're just so crazy!. Please go away and stop telling blatant lies. The people funding this Measure B are just hard working taxpayers tired of getting thrown under the bus by the likes of Steve Cohen and his gold plated political buddies living fat off our tax dollars.
0 0
REPLY
October 14, 2010 | 10:26 AM
Measure B is simple. Voting YES will let the working taxpayers tell the City politicians like Steve Cohen and Kevin McCarty to live on a sensible budget and stop raiding the City Utilities fund to pay for their gold plated retirement plans. Less than half of your utility bill covers clean water. Every time they raise your bill they cut your services because Cohen and McCarty are diverting money from the clean water fund to pay for their selves and their political buddies retirement, medical and dental plans.
0 0
REPLY
October 20, 2010 | 9:35 PM
Why aren't we voting for phone, cable, PG&E or SMUD rates? Why do we beat up on the City - because we can? There are competent and incompetent employees in the City just like everywhere else - including the occasional thief and everything else. If you are convinced the rollback won't hurt you or can't (apartment owners), vote yes. If you are concerned about the fact that the City is the provider of essential services and that, in the long run, the only one hurt may be you, then vote no - or move. I, for one, love living in Sacramento and can guess that safe, modern utilities are not free.
1 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background