STORYLINE Local Government

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Hotel Berry renovation to start next month

by Brandon Darnell, published on September 21, 2010 at 9:34 PM

Storyline: Local Government RSS Feed

1 of 4
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 4
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image

Work to renovate the historic Hotel Berry, 729 L St., will commence next month, after the City Council held its final public hearing on the issue Tuesday night.

“This is a project we’ve been working on for some time,” said Christine Weichert, assistant director of Housing and Community Development. “This is the very last step in a long process.”

The public hearing was required before the financing could be undertaken for the $24.5 million project.

According to Weichert, Jamboree Housing of Irvine, Calif., will be working on the renovation project. The funding comes from a mixture of tax credits, federal stimulus funding and redevelopment housing agency funds.

“We did take a thorough look at this because it involves debt, and we have no issues or concerns,” City Treasurer Russ Fehr told the council in response to a question from Councilwoman Sandy Sheedy. “The money is already there. It’s in essence being reclassified.”

No members of the public spoke at the hearing.

The renovation is scheduled to be completed within a year and a half, Weichert said.

The historic hotel was built in 1929 and is located adjacent to the Greyhound station downtown. According to a previous Sacramento Press article, it was purchased in 2007 by AF Evans and Trinity Housing for restoration.

“That was just the time when the market started collapsing,” Weichert said. “They couldn’t get all their financing ... so we ended up owning it.”

Since the 1970s, the hotel had been used for affordable housing, referred to as a single-room occupancy (SRO) hotel.

“It’s affordable housing for people who are earning 45 percent or less of the area’s median income,” Weichert said. “It’s got 104 units.”

Many of those units were inhabited until about six months ago, when tenants were moved to other residences. The last tenant left in June, according to Weichert, who added that the tenants received moving assistance and will have the option to return when the renovation is complete.

“This hotel desperately needs renovation,” Weichert said. “Very little reinvestment has occurred since (it was built).”

Currently, the hotel is plagued by pockets of mold and other issues related to deterioration, said Jeree Glasser-Hedrick, housing finance program manager for Housing and Community Development.

During the renovation, each room will be outfitted with a kitchenette so it will be a self-contained living space, and the ground floor will be remodeled. A Mexican restaurant that formerly occupied a portion of the ground floor will be used as community space.

“It’s going to be exciting to get this thing rehabbed,” Weichert said.

“This is a terrific project,” said City Councilman Ray Tretheway.

Brandon Darnell is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

September 22, 2010 | 8:55 AM
I hope they don't change that huge ad with the Clark Gable chef!
4 0
REPLY
September 22, 2010 | 4:13 PM
I heard in another media piece that original tenants will be brought back. So the inside "community room" will be key for those residents to congregate in to watch TV, read, socialize, etc. --instead of the K Street mall. Roof space for smokers and others wanting to get outside would also be a great addition, but I doubt that is part of the plan. Good management will be key also. Without either, there will be little change.
2 0
REPLY
September 22, 2010 | 6:47 PM
why does it now cost $24 million and from last year's article the cost to fix this place up was reported as $13 million? Wow, for 100 broom closet sized rooms it is costing over $240,000 per room.

see last years article http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/3831/City_To_Close_Historic_Berry_Hotel
1 1
REPLY
September 22, 2010 | 11:09 PM
This is the BIGGEST WASTE of money I've heard of in a long time. Sacramento is getting SUCKERED and no wonder we are broke. $240k to give a shady character a closet to bunk in???.. Just cut them a check for $40k and give them a bus ticket back to West Sac, where they likely came from as they CLEAN UP THEIR funky areas. We should trade Mayors with W Sac. I bet their mayor would not conduct his business this way.

The classy chicks with money to shop and their entourages are NEVER going to come downtown if you keep up this insanity. Let me guess this short sightedness was a DEMOCRATS idea. First violence on Second Saturday and now this. Who's in charge?

It's an UGLY Building!!!1 Just bulldozz the thing.

REally, you'd rather have this instead of something like The Guggenheim Museum?

I'd love to know who makes these decisions and what their major was in college, if they even went to college. I think our City Planners went to Yuba City College or something.

Cowtown.

0 6
REPLY
September 23, 2010 | 11:36 AM
Names of decision makers are all a matter of record if you want to know who decides what.
0 0
REPLY
September 22, 2010 | 11:34 PM
This is the latest in a series of Sacramento redevelopment boondoggles. Spending $240,000 per unit to renovate postage stamp-size single room units is insane and a gross insult to Sacramento taxpayers. We can buy decent small homes for each occupant for under $100,000 in this market. You can build upscale new apartments for $100,000 per unit in this market. This building is and always has been an eyesore and a magnet for mismanaged social problems that have been negatively impacting development of K Street for decades.

The project is funded through the redevelopment "slush fund" run by an agency that operates almost entirely without public scrutiny (i.e. not one person showed up to testify on the matter). This kind of irresponsible SHRA spending starves the city and local schools of large sums of property tax revenue that should be going to hire more police officers, keeping our browned-out fire stations open and restoring maintenance of our neglected city parks, as well as shoring up depleted classroom spending.

The redevelopment industrial complex in Sacramento depends upon the public not understanding how redevelopment works and how it's paid for. Redevelopment spending should have to compete head-to-head with all of the city's other spending priorities during the city council's budget hearings.

1 1
REPLY
September 27, 2010 | 2:05 PM
Why didn't YOU show up?
1 0
REPLY
September 23, 2010 | 9:12 PM
As a point of clarification, the funds used by SHRA are housing set-aside funds that must be spent on affordable housing. It's a common misconception that housing set-aside funds generated from redevelopment project areas can be spent on City general fund activities such as police, fire. schools and parks. These funds can not be used for those purposes. Additionally, the renovation budget is consistent with urban infill rehab costs for buildings of this age with substantive deferred maintenance that require seismic upgrades.This project will transform a dilapidated building into a safe, high quality, affordable place to live in the downtown. One of the main purposes of redevelopment is to remove blight and provide affordable housing to all income levels. The Hotel Berry project will achieve this purpose even in a down market. Bravo to SHRA for making this deserving project happen!
4 0
REPLY
October 26, 2010 | 8:49 PM
What makes you believe this will be high quality? AND what makes you think this will be for ALL income levels? AND what makes you think this will remove blight??? It will look the same from the outside, it will have the same people inside spilling onto Kst and loitering about the place. After 20million you will have absolutely no idea that anything has changed - unless someone tells you that 20mil was sunk into the place. The only change will be that the City will have locked in the SRO into the heart and center of a supposed revitalization. For the record, NY rebuilds these historic hotels and sells the condos to people of means with money (taxes) to spend in the the area. That is true revitalization. What this is that the city is doing, I'm not sure what to call it - perhaps, Retrenchment - of the status quo. Honesty, there are small minded and narrow minded people who don't want neighborhoods to gentrify and they cry to the council, and the spineless, incapable of grand vision council, folds to their demands. It's incompetent.
0 0
REPLY
September 24, 2010 | 8:36 PM
open your minds Sacramento, this is a bigger rip off then the fraud in the City of Bell, just last year this project was going to be renovated for $13 million, the average apartment building in downtown Sacramento sells for about $60,000 per unit. Or if you really want to make a splash, go buy one of the new upscale properties in Natomas that will only cost you $120,000 per unit and wow, these guys would live in one of the nicest apartment communities in the region. No, the city wants to waist $25 million. Shame on you SHRA for allowing this project to happen. This should be investigated.

You would think someone at SHRA would have asked, gee, that sounds like a boat load of money to redevelop this building when only last year it was going to cost only 13 millio. Then come to the same conclusion as last year’s decision and drop the project from consideration.
0 0
REPLY
September 26, 2010 | 3:26 PM
Sad thing is looking at the potential new members of the Council, I doubt there would be a different decision.

KJ where is this new brand of leadership driven? Why doesn't the mayor hire a second grader to his staff. Even a second grader could see how plain dumb this is.

But it is consistent with the Council's plan to move downtown from the K street to somewhere else. This is just one more of a string of decisions relegating the K Street corridor to second class status.

But on the bright side all those drunks and homeless will have somewhere close by to live where they can easily beg and harass folks on K Street
0 0
REPLY
edited on  December 13, 2011 | 2:19 PM
COMMENT REMOVED BY USER
January 28, 2011 | 1:51 PM
The Sex Offenders largest nexus is the Capitol Park Hotel. You don't have people with flashy cars living downtown, there is no free parking for residents like in Midtown. The Hotel Berry was the nicest place to live in downtown (I don;'t know about Capitol Towers) as it was NOT an SRO, there were families with children among the other decent people there. Assuming you want to clean up the downtown area, get the mechants to stop selling malt liquor.
0 1
REPLY
March 7, 2011 | 9:32 AM
Don't I recall that this same Hotel Berry went through a similar renovation, perhaps in the 1980s? It was then, as now, a project that was so expensive compared to benefit that the city could have bought nice homes for the residents, and for half the cost of renovation.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background