STORYLINE Sacramento City Hall / Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

Residents will need to attend Sacramento City Council meetings later in the evening if they want to speak about issues that are not on the weekly council agenda.

The City Council changed its meeting rules Tuesday night to move the open public comment section to the end of the weekly meeting. Currently, the public can speak at the beginning of the meeting on any issue that is not related to the City Council agenda.

Council members were split on the issue and voted 5-3 to alter the time of the open public comment section. Mayor Kevin Johnson and council members Kevin McCarty and Ray Tretheway opposed the change. Councilman Steve Cohn was absent from the meeting.

Johnson and Tretheway said it benefits the public to keep the open public comment period earlier in the evening. Councilwoman Lauren Hammond, meanwhile, strongly supported the move.

“I think moving public comment to the end hurts transparency and council access, and I think it’s disrespectful to the public,” Johnson said.

City Council meetings start at 6 p.m., and citizens often participate in open public comment period before 7 p.m. Now, citizens who want to speak on off-topic issues will need to wait until the end of the meeting. City Council meetings vary in length; some meetings have run for several hours.

Tretheway said public access to the open comment section of the council meetings would be limited because of Regional Transit’s cuts to light rail night routes.

Tracie Rice-Bailey, an advocate for the homeless population, said moving the comment period would be “so very inconvenient for our people.”

Rice-Bailey is an activist with Safe Ground Sacramento, a group that lobbies city leaders to designate a public space in which homeless people could legally camp.

Safe Ground supporters regularly advocate for their cause during the open public comment period of City Council meetings.

Councilwoman Lauren Hammond, meanwhile, said that moving the section to the end of meeting could make the meetings quicker. “My hope is that our meetings won’t be as long,” she said.

Hammond also said that “special interests” dominate the current open public comment time period. She did not identify the groups.

“It might be one group this month; it might be a neighborhood group another month,” Hammond said.

***
Council leaders also decided Tuesday to hold a monthly afternoon City Council meeting.

The council voted 7-1 to meet monthly at 2 p.m. Johnson opposed the idea of an afternoon meeting, saying that adding a meeting to the council’s plate would be inefficient.

Councilman Rob Fong said the afternoon meeting would enable to council to hold workshops and better manage its agenda. The council did not choose a day of the week for the monthly meeting.

Photo by Brandon Darnell.

Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

BVB
Author thumbnail
August 18, 2010 | 11:16 AM
Wow I agree with Kevin Johnson...shudder to think it...but having the public comment period at the end of the meeting puts many members of the public who do not have access to a private vehicle at a disadvantage. This move by Lauren Hammond shows how out of touch she is with many of her constituents that have lower incomes and do not have access to a personal vehicle and rely on public transportation to get around, and I always thought she stood up for the 'little guy'.
4 1
REPLY
August 18, 2010 | 11:37 AM
This means that Fong, Pannell, Sheedy and Waters also voted to move it to the end of the meeting. Did they give a reason? Seems like it would be difficult many members of the public to attend that late at night - is that their goal? If so, not exactly serving their constituents that way.
3 0
REPLY
August 18, 2010 | 11:49 AM
I can't speak for the other councilmembers since I don't live in their districts, but Rob Fong has made it quite clear that talking to constituents is the last thing in the world he would want to do.

Of course Rob Fong would prefer no public comment at all, but having them in late hours is an acceptable compromise for him.
6 0
REPLY
August 18, 2010 | 12:04 PM
From my perspective, council members Fong, Pannell, Sheedy, Waters, Cohn and Hammond have totally lost what it means to be a public servant. However, let them have their “opening acts” (agenda items) during the weekly council meetings. The “closing acts” (public comments) will be far more informative because they identify the true pulse of the city. It’s a pulse many of the above have lost contact with.
6 0
REPLY
August 18, 2010 | 12:07 PM
Council members Sandy Sheedy, Rob Fong, Bonnie Pannell, Robbie Waters and Lauren Hammond voted in favor of moving the open public comment section to the end of council meetings.
3 0
REPLY
August 18, 2010 | 1:05 PM
Way to show you care about the public, Sheedy, Fong, Pannell, Hammond and Waters.
5 0
REPLY
August 18, 2010 | 2:29 PM
Ms. Haley - did they give a reason why they prefer this time? It certainly appears that hearing what the public has to say is very low on their priority list.
2 0
REPLY
August 18, 2010 | 6:20 PM
Hi truthbtold,

Among the supporters of the later time, Hammond gave the most straightforward reason. Fong indicated that it would make the council meetings more businesslike. He said council meetings are public business meetings. You can watch the council's full discussion at the following link: http://sacramento.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view_id=22

Cheers,

Kathleen
1 0
REPLY
August 19, 2010 | 12:39 PM
I think the *reality* of the situation has to do with SafeGround people coming to speak every week without having anything to say. While that certainly hasn't always been the case, it often is that the SafeGround people use wasting the council's time as a form of protest. Mr. Tipper would often come to tell his unfunny jokes that no one would laugh at.

By the way, Tracie Rice-Bailey certainly should not be described as an 'advocate for the homeless population.' Pish tosh! Rice-Bailey is an advocate for SafeGround, a group which raises money for itself, which is now a full-tilt generating income center for the far-far Leftist wing of the "homeless-help" industry.
5 1
REPLY
August 24, 2010 | 1:08 PM
I believe prior to Kevin Johnson becoming mayor, council meetings were held at 2 PM and 6 PM on Tuesdays, and public comment was at the end of the 6 PM meeting, so it appears things are reverting to the the way things were prior to that point.
1 0
REPLY
September 21, 2010 | 3:12 PM
Mr. Armstrong obviously dosen't know Tracie Rice-Bailey
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background