STORYLINE Happenings around Sacramento

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

National Night out in Sacramento

by Kati Garner, published on August 3, 2010 at 9:04 PM

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images

The mayor of our fair city had a busy night out on National Night Out, from north to south Sacramento and points between.

First stop for Mayor Kevin Johnson, Police Chief Braziel and Gus Vina, interim City Manager, was Heritage Park Neighborhood Association off Elkhorn Blvd from 6-6:30pm. Then the three moved on to Robla Park Community Association • Robla Park until 7:20pm.

Throughout the evening until 9:30pm, the Mayor and his staff did touch and go visits to Swanson Estates, Meadowview Neighborhood Association • Freeport Park and finally Golf Course Terrace Estates.

After receiving a warm welcome from residents at Heritage Park on arrival, Mayor Johnson told them their area "exemplifies the very best in neighborhood watch." He explained "our commitment as a city is that public safety is a top priority in Sacramento."  He told them their voices will be heard at City Council on a regular basis with Angelique Ashby being recently voted in and taking office in November. Heritage Park has a 100% participation rate for neighborhood crime watch, explained Ashby.

 

Sacramento Chief of Police Rick Braziel talks with a resident of Heritage Park during his visit.

Angelique Ashby, incoming City Council member, District 1 and Gus Vina applaud as the mayor introduces law enforcement.

 

George Huarjardo (foreground) joins a group of Heritage Park folks who came out to National Night Out for some food, socializing and to meet the mayor. 

 

Kevin and Vicki Coughlin in East Sac talk with a block party visitor. They say this is their sixth year of participating in National Night Out. Many neigborhoods throughout the city held similar National Night Out parties.

 

Block party goers BBQ on a grand scale on 54th street that was blocked off between L and M streets. There was good food, wine and beer from local businesses and things for the kids to do.

National Night Out | America's Night Out Against Crime: "Tight budgets in communities across the country make National Night Out more important than ever…

Communities are being forced by tight budgets to scrutinize everything they do.

The closer people look at the value of National Night Out, the better it is. On a small annual budget, National Association of Town Watch (NATW), the sponsoring organization of National Night Out, has created and hosts an annual event that this year will bring together 37 million Americans in 15,000 communities.

Local coordinators receive everything they need to host a successful National Night Out in their community. NATW remains committed to working with city governments, police departments and grassroots organizers to make their communities better places to live.

And, we begin our second 25 years with a renewed commitment to meeting the same standards of transparency and accountability expected of our law enforcement and community partners." (www.natw.org)

SacPress Photos | Kati Garner

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

August 4, 2010 | 6:08 AM
Where's our high school?
0 1
REPLY
August 4, 2010 | 6:14 AM
wrong article. nice try though, is that all you got?
1 1
REPLY
August 4, 2010 | 10:55 AM
Half the neighborhoods in King Kevin's City don't have a high school, even after a lawsuit was won. KJ's the reason. Oh and Angelo Tsakopols (how it was printed on the Johnson/Rhee invites), in case you missed the news. And BTW, fiancee Rhee is DC's education czar.

Where's our high school?
1 4
REPLY
August 4, 2010 | 11:22 AM
this was a night out against crime, not for education. read the bee article:

http://www.sacbee.com/2010/08/03/2935201/neighbors-celebrate-national-night.html

take note of the third paragraph that says "...in its 27th year nationally, is intended to bring neighbors together in a stand against crime. "

geez, i bet if KJ was out fighting for high schools you would blast him for ignoring the crime problems in sacramento. some people you just can 't make happy. right "naga"?

4 0
REPLY
August 4, 2010 | 11:27 AM
"Half the neighborhoods in King Kevin's City don't have a high school, even after a lawsuit was won. KJ's the reason. "

KJ is the reason, really? so his year and half of being mayor of sacramento (you remember that position can't really do anything without city council approval right?) and he is the sole reason there aren't high schools in half of the neighborhoods in sacramento? it couldn't possibly be the sacramento school district doesn't have enough money or teachers to create those schools. no, no, no...in "naga's" world the reason sacramento has half as many schools as "naga" says we need is because KJ is mayor.

thank you for displaying yet again why you are closed-minded. oh and before you spout your "you are misrepresenting and lying" garbage you like to spew, please reference something i have said that is incorrect if you are going to accuse me of anything.
4 1
REPLY
August 4, 2010 | 11:51 AM
"thank you for displaying yet again why you are closed-minded. oh and before you spout your "you are misrepresenting and lying" garbage you like to spew, please reference something i have said that is incorrect if you are going to accuse me of anything."

Here ya go. I did not say this. It's another lie from you:

"in "naga's" world the reason sacramento has half as many schools as "naga" says we need is because KJ is mayor. "

And again, you don't know what you're talking about. It was mentioned in the news yesterday. Do some reading about the record of St. HOPE -- and why it displaced the student body of Sacramento High School.

It is you who are "close-minded" if you don't think that neighbors at a community night-out, are not concerned about or discussing the education of their children and aware of the connection between educational opportunities and crime.

Duh.
1 2
REPLY
August 4, 2010 | 12:42 PM
and this article is still about crime, not education. duh!!!!!!! they may be discussing education, but the purpose, as was given in my website reference AND quote, is to combat crime. but then again, i wouldn't ever expect you to stay on topic.
3 0
REPLY
August 4, 2010 | 1:41 PM
It would be great if you guys could keep the focus on the story and the issues within the story instead of engaging in contsant negative back and forth with one another. If you need a reminder about what we do and don't allow, I would encourage you to visit our rules of conduct here: http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/190/Rules_of_Conduct
0 0
REPLY
August 4, 2010 | 3:51 PM
wow!!! my agreeing statement got removed? ok, i guess.....
2 1
REPLY
August 4, 2010 | 4:08 PM
None of your comments were removed on this thread, Rich E.
1 0
REPLY
August 4, 2010 | 11:28 PM
" the purpose, as was given in my website reference AND quote, is to combat crime ..."

That is a silly, rigid, close minded interpretation of what the event is about.
0 2
REPLY
August 5, 2010 | 8:58 AM
and you reason is? or am i suppose to read your mind as to why it is silly?
0 0
REPLY
August 5, 2010 | 9:58 AM
it's silly because it is rigid and close minded. You can't fathom any more aspects, of community and neighbors coming outside to meet and hang out with each other, than ONE? Maybe you should let them all know that the only thing they're allowed -- by you -- to think or talk about is crime. OR ELSE!
0 2
REPLY
August 5, 2010 | 10:51 AM
naga, my god, talk about silly. did i ever say people were only suppose to talk about crime? of course not, what i said, but don't expect you to comprehend, is the purpose of the "National Night Out" is to show support and uniformity against crime. the purpose behind it is not to support education. of course people will discuss education. but the mayor and all attendees were there to support the individual neighorhoods against crime. which is why your first statement of "Where's our high school?" does not fit. the two are relatable. like i said in an earlier post, if he was out supporting local high schools, you would blast him for not supporting crime.

you take a good idea of rallying communities around fighting crime and see the negative side of "where is our high school?". how about saying:

"dear mayor, political and business attendees. as supportive of the fight against crime in our local communities as i am, i am still concerned over the lack of high schools in the area to educate our youths of today. i feel if we educate our youths, this will in turn help the fight against crime by giving them careers so they can be contributing members to society. thank you for your commitment to our neighborhoods and i hope you also spend the equal time necessary towards our local education system".

instead you come right out with "where are our high schools?" with such a negative tone, can you blame anyone for tuning you out right away? but then again, that would be way too much to ask for you to be open-minded towards something like that...
2 1
REPLY
edited on  August 5, 2010 | 8:16 PM
"did i ever say people were only suppose to talk about crime?"

"and this article is still about crime, not education. duh!!!!!!! they may be discussing education, but the purpose, as was given in my website reference AND quote, is to combat crime."

The reason that correcting the current attacks on our education system is so crucial is to prevent more generations of dumbed down, black and white thinkers, people who think in rigid categories, have no critical thinking skills, who use dictionaries to strangle word definitions and totally miss the big picture.
1 1
REPLY
August 6, 2010 | 6:20 AM
your horrible attempt to insult me only is boring and tiresome.

once again, the point of the National Night Out was for communities to rally around each other and show solidarity against the ever increasing crime rates. it is for neighborhoods to take back their communities. if you can't see that, then no amount of education that you are concerned about will ever help you make the connection.
1 1
REPLY
edited on  August 7, 2010 | 8:32 AM
it's about community. it's celebrated all over the country and all over the city. not just by rigid black and white thinkers.
1 0
REPLY
August 9, 2010 | 12:26 PM
"National Night Out, introduced by the National Association of Town Watch in 1984, is designed to bring neighbors together and make it clear to criminals that residents will look out for one another."

i guess if you would have gone to the link i provided above you would have seen this part of the article. sorry, next time i won't make that mistake again of giving you a resource because it is clear you don't read them.

0 1
REPLY
August 9, 2010 | 2:21 PM
"... is designed to bring neighbors together..."

Thank you for making my point.
1 0
REPLY
August 10, 2010 | 9:01 AM
"make it clear to criminals that residents will look out for one another"

i don't recall ever disputing the "bringing the neighbors together" aspect. it was the WHY they are getting together that you are wrong about. read the part about making it clear to criminals (i.e. those who commit crimes) that neighbors banding together against them. they aren't banding together to get more high schools or fight for more money towards education or parks or anything else you want to claim. they are getting together to fight crime. but i wouldn't expect you to get that because that is just way too obvious.
0 1
REPLY
August 10, 2010 | 12:20 PM
yes, you're right. it is "just way too obvious" (and obtuse).

when you go out and talk to every neighbor, neighborhood and community, gathering on that night and talking about whatever you tell them they're not supposed to be talking about -- because YOU SAY SO and it's ALL ABOUT CRIME -- and they don't laugh you off or put a hot dog up your nose, when they all agree to follow YOUR rules about their front porch conversations, get back to us. Bring video.
1 0
REPLY
August 10, 2010 | 2:16 PM
for crying out loud "naga" that is not what i said. i have said numerous times that when people get together of course they will talk about other things than crime. but the vehicle to get people together is the fight against crime. for instance, when people get together for the susan g. koeman race in may, they get together and talk about all things, life, work, business, schools, etc. but what is the vehicle that gets them together? duh.....breast cancer awareness. the susan g. koeman foundation does not say "hey come on out and run a race for high schools". they say "come on out and support breast cancer research". just like national night out did not say "hey, communities get together and talk about high schools", but they did say "hey communities, get together and fight against local neighborhood crime".


do i have to spell out everything for you? you talk about me never understanding whatever mind games you want to play, but i don't think i can spell it out and further than that. if you can't understand the basic principle of "get together to fight crime" as the vehicle to get neighbors together, then it will take someone with a doctorate to help....and that, admittedly, i don't have.
0 0
REPLY
August 10, 2010 | 5:48 PM
well OF COURSE KJ doesn't want anyone at his neighborhood "community" photo op asking "WHERE'S OUR HIGH SCHOOL?"



Rich E. do ya need a hug? :hug:
0 0
REPLY
August 11, 2010 | 6:07 AM
and we have finally reached the crux of your argument. eventhough this is a national thing, you have a problem with KJ. well that explains your lack of factual information and understanding of the purpose of national night out. as i said in our other discussion, go get some facts and we can continue. otherwise, have a nice life...
0 0
REPLY
August 11, 2010 | 9:38 AM
and we have finally reached the crux of your pretense that what you say about what others say is true.

how do you figure that only YOUR point of view and opinion is the ONLY correct one? shouldn't you be on bigger boards duking it out with the bullies? this is small potatoes here, mate. ;>)
0 0
REPLY
August 11, 2010 | 11:34 AM
not in the least. i find mr. burg's comments very informative. you see, with him i could have a conversation because he would give me a resource for me to read. his opinions are educated and well thought out. your's on the other hand seem to be pointless, thoughtless and uneducated. if you were to give me websites, books, pamphlets, essays, etc. (you know, those little things called a "source") then i would extend the same respect to you. as it is, have fun in the land of make believe.
0 0
REPLY
edited on  August 12, 2010 | 12:29 PM
dude. you have serious control issues. seriesly.



it's not my job to educate you. inform yourself. don't understand a reference: Google it! or ASK. don't pretend to know what you don't. try recognizing points of agreement instead of always trying to shout down what you don't understand. how bout that?
0 0
REPLY
August 12, 2010 | 3:24 PM
again, i will direct your attention to the several times i have mentioned it: i have facts to back up your point. i don't have a problem disagreeing with someone and leaving the conversation with an understanding we just won't agree. with you, you don't show facts. therefore, your opinions are unfounded. i have given you a website that shows exactly what national night out was all about and you insist on disagreeing with it. that isn't my problem.

as far as control issues, i have no idea what you are talking about. if you are 100% behind your opinion, i don't have a problem with that, and neither should you. if you let me talk you down out of your stance, then apparently your stance wasn't that firm. again, not my problem. have an opinion, have supporting references for your opinion and we will be fine. i am not into these emotional name calling games either. frankly i would rather have a respectful conversation with you. but the conversation needs facst, otherwise we are arguing opinions, and opinions are subjective.

like i have said before, have a nice life. i look forward to the day where we can have a civilized discussion.
0 0
REPLY
August 12, 2010 | 4:32 PM
LOL
0 0
REPLY
August 4, 2010 | 9:22 AM
I went to the one in my parents neighborhood, and was banned from entering the park by someone from the parks district and threats from her two hired paladin security goons. As usual, a well intentioned program is being hijacked by political and personal agendas

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXQqpCCEQT0
2 1
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background