STORYLINE Sacramento City Hall / Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

 In an abandoned corner of City Hall that formerly housed the planning department, four auditors are digging for information about the city’s rules and finances.

Jorge Oseguera, the new city auditor, has narrowed down the top four areas of municipal government he will investigate first: the city’s health benefits, citywide policies, revenue collections and the vehicle fleet.

In addition to those audits, he has four more in the hopper. The next set of audits will cover the city’s 311 information center, purchase cards, fire inspection fees and the city’s sidewalk repair process.

The City Council gave Oseguera permission to move ahead with the audits in June.

Oseguera said his goal is to complete the eight audits by June 30, 2011, the end of the fiscal year.

“If we don’t finish all eight, at the very least, we’ll initiate all eight,” he said in an interview Thursday.

In the revenue collections audit, Oseguera said he wants to learn if cuts to staff have affected the way the city collects cash. He will examine the Finance Department, among other departments.

Leyne Milstein, city finance director and head of the Finance Department, spoke positively about the revenue collections audit. “They’ll provide a second set of eyes,” she said.

On the issue of health benefits, Oseguera noted in a Jan. 22 report to the City Council that $34 million of the city’s funds go toward medical insurance for employees and retirees. The city may be able to find other ways to pay for health benefits, he wrote.

Meanwhile, the city’s fleet of vehicles should be audited with a focus on its management, he wrote in the report.

He pointed out in the report that the city’s fleet, which is overseen by the General Services Department, had a proposed 2011 fiscal year budget of $34 million.

“It’s a lot of money that we’re spending on fleet,” he said.

The auditors will delve into why the fleet division’s budget for this fiscal year was about $7 million less than its budget in 2007/08, according to the report.

Hiring outside the city for some areas of fleet work is another idea they will study. San Jose saved money and enhanced its operations as a result of an audit on its vehicle fleet, Oseguera noted in his report.

In a fourth audit, Oseguera and staff will look at rules used throughout the city government, he said.

The city “seems to lack several important formal policies,” Oseguera said in his report. He’s also looking into whether city procedures contradict each other, or if they haven’t been updated.

The scope of each audit is not limited to one city department, Oseguera said, noting that the audits on the city’s polices, revenue collections and vehicle fleet will involve numerous departments.

Oseguera and his staff will focus on the Finance Department in the revenue collections audit. But they will examine several other city departments because many of them collect money, he said.

The General Services Department, which oversees the vehicle fleet, will be scrutinized in the fleet audit. But again, Oseguera pointed out that numerous departments will be involved. Many departments use vehicles, he said.

The same principle applies to the citywide policies audit. While the city manager’s office will play a key role in the audit, citywide policies affect multiple departments, he noted.

The results of the audit will produce a report that includes recommendations. The City Council is in charge of making any decisions in response to the audit.

Oseguera said his audit reports will be made public.

He explained that the audit process includes data gathering, risk assessment, interviews and analysis. The risk assessment process plays an important role in the audit. For that step, the auditors investigate possible areas where the city might be vulnerable, he said.

“Through the risk assessment, what we do is we try to brainstorm about all the things that could possibly go wrong, all the threats that are involved,” he said.

Oseguera said the public can participate in the audit process. “(I’m) willing to talk to whoever is interested in talking to me about potential concerns that they may have regarding the city, regarding operations,” he said.

Read more information about all eight planned audits here.

Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

July 24, 2010 | 8:31 AM
A budget of over half a million bucks and no audits in four months. The City CPA needs to start producing. We are having brown-outs because we funded this guy. Thankfully the playing around period has finally ended. Time to show some real work!
6 0
REPLY
July 24, 2010 | 8:33 AM
The city pays $34M for employee health insurance? So if we had a single payor national health care plan, wouldn't that $34M solve our budget problem?
3 4
REPLY
July 26, 2010 | 8:48 AM
You realize that under a single payer plan that employers would still be obligated to pay into the health system?

Without arguing the pro's and con's of single payer health, at least with the current system city can modify the benefits and shop around to different providers, while a single payer plan would not allow any such wiggle room.
2 0
REPLY
July 24, 2010 | 12:04 PM
O.K. so the city has a budget problem and police & fire takes up 70 - 80% of the budget and Mr. Oseguera is auditing what?

Once again we have our priorities screwed up! This is just like when the DSD was sinking the ship as a result of Billy Boy Thomas' corrupt schemes and his boss Ray KerRIDge would not let the former auditor audit his department. What is up with this?

Oh - BTW - Mr. Thomas has now written a book touting how he screwed Sacramento. But in it he states that if you hype anything enough, that you can get people to believe whatever you are feeding them. He also boasts of how he used the dept's PIO to do it. The last chapter in his book should have been how to screw up a city department & stay out of prison.
5 0
REPLY
July 24, 2010 | 3:22 PM
Every area to be audited are long standing areas of problems, not exactly rocket science. A 43 million dollar deficit, clearly most things are not operating efficiently.

Identifying real solutions will determine if the City was wise in spending over a half a million dollars annually on this new audit department.
0 0
REPLY
July 24, 2010 | 4:07 PM
"Most things" in the city budget are police and fire. So where's the audit?
1 0
REPLY
July 26, 2010 | 12:50 PM

We all know the police and firefighters are untouchable in this city.

You know the storyline... they do dangerous work and therefore can't be subjected to bothersome civilians nosing around their books.

1 0
REPLY
July 25, 2010 | 11:01 AM
In all municipal governments Police and Fire take most of the budget. Utilities and transportation are usually funded through an enterprise fund. That is how municipal budgets work. Auditing these major areas is probably not a bad idea but there may be other areas that need a lot more help. Community Development is undergoing a separate investigation. I'm curious if the findings will ever be made public.
2 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background