STORYLINE DWB: The View from Downtown

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Karpaty's vision is nearly reality

by David Watts Barton, published on July 22, 2010 at 10:38 PM

1 of 5
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 5
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image Slideshow image

OK, now I'm really excited.

After the decision by the Sacramento City Council to choose the D&S Development and David Taylor Interests’ Promenade on K project for the 700 and 800 blocks of K Street, I feel good. Finally, there seems to be a plan in place for projects that will bring more life to K Street.

But I also want to celebrate the fact that there is already lots of life on K Street - and not just of the undesirable kind.

I live near K Street, and most nights, I can ride my bike down the street and see people walking from all manner of venues within the four blocks between Ninth and 13th streets: Marilyn's on K, the Crest, Cosmopolitan Cafe and Cabaret, Social, Ella, Cabana, the Esquire Imax and the Community Center Theatre all draw crowds. Throw in Parlare Euro Lounge and The Citizen Hotel and Grange restaurant, and you've got a number of folks out on the town.

Suburbanites with city fear may feel uncomfortable at times, but despite its name, the K Street Mall is not a mall. It's an urban street. And no matter how many establishments are on it, some won't feel safe. That's not the city's problem, really. The suburbs exist for a reason. The city's not for everyone.

But it is definitely for George Karpaty. The Bay area club developer's Dive Bar/Pizza Rock/District 30 trifecta on K between 10th and 11th is more than two-thirds done and will open this October. And it is going to be spectacular.

I use the word "spectacular" advisedly. Karpaty was up here Thursday to check out his crew's progress, and was generous enough to give Sacramento Press reporter Suzanne Hurt and me an hour-long tour of the construction. Suzanne goes into great detail elsewhere in today's Sacramento Press.

I'll let Suzanne give you the details, which are amazing, and instead focus on my overall impression.

Wow.

This project has been trash-talked since it was first announced. It's been denounced by naysayers and some competitors as corrupt (there was public money involved), and by others as the wrong development in the wrong place. And I have to admit that I had my doubts. Development in Sacramento, as everywhere, can be shady, and when city funds are involved, some people assume the worst.

One friend has even complained that it will bring the wrong kind of people - "bridge and tunnel" types - as though only those deemed "cool" are entitled to enjoy Sacramento. Early media reports made it sound cheesy and over-the-top, and the original name Frisky Rhythm for the over-30 bar got lots of mocking commentary. And like many, I'm not one to think that Sacramento (or anywhere else) needs another theme bar or pizza parlor.

But having seen it with my own eyes, and having spent an hour with Karpaty, my opinion has changed. Spectacularly.

This is going to be something else. If you don't like bars or pizza parlors, if you like things low-key and modest, if you like K Street the way it is, this is not going to appeal. But one hour's tour gave me ample evidence that Karpaty is doing it right. He speaks with great passion and much sophistication about design, lighting, materials, sound, different types of crowds, economics and urban design. He's a substantial guy.

And the retrofitting of these old buildings - to accommodate a 7,500-gallon saltwater aquarium and so much electricity that an entire SMUD mini-substation is being built under the street in front - is nothing short of dazzling. Karpaty aims to serve a wide audience, and when it is all done - wait until you see the building facade, let alone inside - people are going to come from many miles around to check it out.

As I said, spectacular. As in, a spectacle.

But more deeply, what I came away feeling after this hour with Karpaty is a deep sense of inspiration and possibility. If Karpaty, who owns six clubs in the Bay area and knows his business, is going to invest so much in our town - a town not his own - why can't we?

We as individuals don't have to invest huge amounts of money, but what we DO need to do, IMHO, is get behind the people who are doing the work, taking the risks and spending their time on making K Street even more worth visiting. It's important to be critical and look at the details, and to be skeptical as well. But we also need to embrace change and take chances - yes, even with public money - and we need to have some faith that businessmen who are trying to make things happen, who are spending their lives creating jobs and bring life to areas that have been neglected, are not, as Karpaty says, "the bad guys."

Karpaty is about to open a group of venues that are going to take us a couple of big steps closer to creating a place where people will come from many miles around to walk, drink, eat, talk and celebrate the urban life. And I just don't see, as a citizen, as a tax payer and as a neighbor, how that is going to be anything but a good thing. And even if I find out that I am dead wrong, I am happy to take that chance.

So, I invite everyone to join me as I sit back and savor this moment: Not only can it happen here, it is happening here. Just wait till you see it.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

July 22, 2010 | 10:49 PM
I'm into things that will make K Street more vibrant and successful, but I'm not sure why it's laudable that these three business will draw so much power that they require their own SMUD substation.
2 2
REPLY
edited on  July 23, 2010 | 6:57 PM
The last uses in those buildings was retail and office - restaurants use a lot more power . In addition to needing a bit more power in the short term, they're likely putting additional infrastructure in place now in anticipation of more development later. NPV calculations make it more cost effective to do the infrastructure upgrades for more intensive development now rather than wait a few years. It looks like this developer is interested in making K Street a destination now while planning ahead instead of many CBD landowners who are letting their buildings sit empty and rotting while they wait for the skyscraper fairy.
3 1
REPLY
July 22, 2010 | 11:50 PM
Yes, I understand that, but "...so much electricity that an entire SMUD mini-substation is being built under the street in front ..." sounds like it's unusual even by those standards.
1 1
REPLY
July 23, 2010 | 8:11 AM
In some ways I think they are counting on eventual future growth in the area.
3 1
REPLY
July 23, 2010 | 2:09 AM
Frankly, Tony, your comment comes as a cold slap of icewater to the face after just having read David's cheery, enthusiastic embrace of the possibilities for K Street's new venues. But I echo Lisa's comment--I've heard the venues will need the power because the previous tenants' power usage was so much less demanding. I've also heard the new substation is being built with the assumption a large power user will also be occupying the huge vacant space at 1012 K Street (the former Rite-Aid/Pay-Less stores) when a tenant is found--meaning they will be ready for them, rather than having to go back and modify the underground substation in the future. I vote to join David in his willingness to risk excitement and a welcoming open-arms approach to Karpaty's efforts--it's a refreshing and long overdue change of attitude for K Street Mall and its future, and I hope Karpaty and company hit a home run for the K Street Mall.
5 3
REPLY
edited on  July 23, 2010 | 3:48 AM
I'm in agreement with David's sentiments and I'm very happy to see activity on K Street. That one sentence just surprised me as it seemed to be applauding the massive power usage, which isn't especially trendy these days. For the record, I don't know what a "mini-substation" really represents in practice - perhaps it's entirely reasonable for such an enterprise. But that wasn't really my point.

Forget my concern: I think I read something into that sentence that most likely isn't there.
3 1
REPLY
July 23, 2010 | 10:35 AM
My point was that of all the positive and upbeat things that were presented by David, you seemed to focus on a negative, as if you were looking for something negative to say in all the cheery excitement. Just like that substation statement rubbed you the wrong way, your comment rubbed me the wrong way because I'm so tired of all the automatic negativity surrounding the efforts to revitalize the empty and downtrodden areas of the K Street Mall. Please understand that I certainly wouldn't applaud wasteful energy usage, either--I'm personally as frugal as it gets according to SMUD (when they did an energy audit of my home they said I was using far less power than the average person, and there really wasn't much more they could recommend). How about David finding out just what their energy usage and energy-saving efforts will consist of? I'm guessing in a ground-up rebuilding of space such as this one they're tuned into same. Thanks for admitting that you don't actually know what a mini-substation represents, by the way.
2 0
REPLY
CCC
Author thumbnail
July 23, 2010 | 10:49 AM
public funds for a bar aimed at keeping most of it out? SWEET. I am glad this dude is getting public money to make a personal profit. What a crock. I don't remember a gimmicky bar ever being the linchpin of a thriving CBD, but maybe my memory is bad.
0 5
REPLY
July 23, 2010 | 12:45 PM
Check out Karpaty's successes elsewhere, CCC. And, oh, please, you know they're not going to kick out people under age 30 or over age 50 who are there to dance and enjoy... (Geez...) It's just another dance club with a specific idea for its focus--like every other dance bar out there.
2 0
REPLY
CCC
Author thumbnail
July 23, 2010 | 4:03 PM
Success is a highly subjective term. I never said they were going to kick anyone out just commenting on what he said (which was assinine) -why does someone this rich get public money anyway?
0 2
REPLY
July 23, 2010 | 2:50 PM
Thanks for the comments. It didn't occur to me that that one paragraph - a minor detail in the story - would get the greater part of the comments, especially from Tony, whose beloved Crest will most likely benefit from this development. I did figure that many wouldn't like the idea, period. Saying "No, I don't like it, thus no one should have it" is a way of life in some parts of Sacramento.
That said, I haven't looked into the actual energy usage of these three venues, and I'm not entirely sure Karpaty has. An oversight, perhaps, or perhaps as a smart businessman, he has calculated how much that energy will COST him, and accomodated that.
But I'm fairly certain that these places won't be LEED-certified anytime soon.
On the other hand, I am not going to go protest the waste of energy in Times Square - I'm going to go look at all the pretty lights!
Those who worry about these things can take solace in the fact that all of the other empty store fronts on K (and J, and 16th, and Broadway) are using no energy whatsoever! Surely, there's a balancing out there?
3 0
REPLY
July 23, 2010 | 4:19 PM
I'm interested in the use of the term "gimmick."

These places seem unbelievable visions - even fantasies. I've never been inside anything like what is being described here.

I really think of these as fantasies. They have so many strange features that I don't see gimmicks as much as a see wild dreamscapes.

I know one thing: I will go there at least once. I have to see what it looks like when done. I just have to see it.
1 0
REPLY
July 24, 2010 | 11:24 PM
The vault being constructed beneath K Street will accommodate the SMUD transformers. Standard practice for SMUD is to require that the transformers not be exposed in the public way. In some cities, such as San Diego, you will see transformers on the sidewalks..between building frontage and curb. ( In San Diego artists paint them to dress them up.) In Sacramento the SMUD transformer is typically on private property..and very seldom in the public way. Being as the primary electric service is on the K Street side rather than in the alley, there is nowhere to put the transformer on-site...the building fronts take up all of the on-site space on K Street. The vault seems disproportionately large because additional space is required for air flow and access. Putting the transformers underground requires a large volume of space and is very costly. In the case of these new venues on K Street, the vault, though costly, is the logical solution.
1 0
REPLY
July 25, 2010 | 12:41 AM
If this bombs like it probably will, it hope it casts the proper light on all the parties involved.
0 1
REPLY
July 25, 2010 | 12:52 PM
Like it or not, the fact is the K Street Mall is a core and very visible area of downtown. When strolling it (yes, believe it or not, I do from time to time, as parts of it are pleasant and the absence of auto traffic makes it more relaxing--and yes, I know that's changing with the return of vehicle traffic next year), I have run into folks who are clearly visitors, and, when talking with them, find they are often staying at the Hyatt, Citizen, Sheraton hotels or the beautiful hostel we have downtown--and they're out to see the city. Imagine their first impression when they see such distressed areas at our city's core. Especially after 5pm, when some businesses look like they're in lockdown for a pending riot. Karpaty's venues will be open in the evenings, will be right across from the Crest and next to the Cosmo complex, and will really change that block of K Street for the better if they succeed.
1 0
REPLY
July 27, 2010 | 11:45 AM
Its non-sustainable
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background