STORYLINE What happened here?

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Elk Grove gains new Wal-Mart

by Sarah Berg, published on February 6, 2009 at 4:02 PM

Storyline: What happened here? RSS Feed
Community Tags business People politics wal-mart

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images

While everyone else is being layed off and experiencing furlough, Wal-Mart is opening a 100,000-square-foot store in Elk Grove. Its location will be at Bruceville and Poppyridge. The store located at Elk Grove Blvd and 99 will remain open.

Wal-Mart spokesman Aaron Rios claims that this Wal-Mart will sell fresh groceries in addition to their usual merchandise.

As someone who is not a supporter of the Wal-Mart monopoly, I wonder why there is a need for a second Wal-Mart in an already covered-up-strip-mall area? I also wonder how fresh those groceries will actually be?

Although this new store opening is probably good news to those who are in need of a job, my words to you are good luck. We all know that Wal-Mart’s hourly pay is not nearly enough to support one's self, let alone a family.

Is anyone else as infuriated as me with this new store that’s opening?
 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

February 6, 2009 | 4:34 PM
No, I'm not infuriated at all. They offer products to people who can't afford to buy them else where. If the pay was to low, nobody would apply for a job and if Wal-Mart had such a monopoly, other stores in the strip mall would be going out of business, but that's not the case if you look at other Wal-Mart locations in the Sacramento area.

You sound bitter, I'm sure the City of Elk Grove is happy a new store is opening and contributing tax dollars into the coffers when others are closing due to the economy.
1 3
REPLY
February 6, 2009 | 6:38 PM
ick. I don't want to get into it too much, but Wal Mart has a history of NOT contributing tax dollars to the coffers. They also tend to turn small downtown areas into ghost towns. and "super" wal marts are a very scary thing.

Also, have you ever seen a Wal Mart employee smiling? The last time I went to one of these places I remember the register clerk saying to me, "Why do you shop here? All we sell is cheap crap." Well, I don't shop there anymore. I very much dislike that place.
1 1
REPLY
February 6, 2009 | 6:45 PM
So when a Wal-Mart sells stuff that gets taxed, the city doe's not get anything? Please Mark, tell me where the millions of tax dollars go if not to the coffers? Which downtowns are you talking about? They said the same thing about Woodland 15 years ago when Wal-Mart arrived and downtown is fine, all the stores are filled.

Do everyone a favor and don't shop there, the dollartree might be a better fit for you.
1 3
REPLY
edited on  February 7, 2009 | 11:56 AM
Sales taxes to go the state, trapper, not directly to the city. I don't know the specifics for the Elk Grove store, but I do know about the Wal Mart that moved into a town called Lebanon in Oregon. Here is a brief synopsis of that towns sad fate.

Lebanon is a small town on a major trucking route with a Main Street on which everything needed (groceries, trinkets, electronics, clothing, etc) could be found...10 years ago. The shops were quaint, the owners local and weekends walking down Main Street were a lot of fun with people everywhere. The city was doing fine. Wal Mart saw the potential of a store located in this town. They negotiated a deal that included a 5 year tax exemption to the city of Lebanon. The city figured it was worth it in order to reap the benefits of the long-term taxes. For five years the city gained NO revenue from Wal Mart during which time Main Street quickly emptied of every quaint store with the exception of a Rent a Center and some Thrift stores. It's a street of vacant buildings with very little foot traffic now days.

To finish the story. Before the 5 year tax exemption was up Wal Mart built a "superstore" 1 mile down the road and moved in. They relocated across city limits and out of Lebanon's tax jurisdiction. They negotiated a similar deal with the city to which they moved (not sure of its name). They also left an enormous abandoned building with an immense vacated parking lot. The city of Lebanon was responsible for the buliding, which now houses a church at great cost to the city. Main Street will never recover, the city's culture has all but died because it centered around Main Street.

So there, trapper is the answer to your question. Wal Mart is a faceless terror who abuses the cities and towns they move into. And they sell cheap crap.
1 0
REPLY
Dan
Author thumbnail
February 7, 2009 | 6:17 AM
I don't see many unemployed people smiling either. A place where low-middle-class families can buy stuff to survive is a lot more important than a bunch of mom-and-pop stores that have everything marked up.
1 0
REPLY
edited on  February 7, 2009 | 7:07 AM
Can't say that I'm pleased, though I don't live anywhere near this. The problem is that old cliche: Wal-Mart and other big-box stores drive out local businesses, entities which have more of a stake in the community. This isn't a question of taste: a local business owner, who lives in the community he serves, will view his customers as fellow citizens and not just faceless consumers. He or she has more of a stake in making the community a better place.

Furthermore, big-box establishments depend upon expanded, fuel-wasting supply chains that are bad for the environment and will simply not be sustainable in the near future. As far as cheap goods, well...what are we talking about here? Salad shooters,, hair dryers, and other cheap plastic stuff that are not necessities, or vital products like food or drugs? If it's the latter, I find it had to believe that Wal-Mart provides the best long-term solution for affordability; if it's the former, I find it hard to care.
3 1
REPLY
February 7, 2009 | 9:46 AM
well put.
0 1
REPLY
Dan
Author thumbnail
February 7, 2009 | 1:32 PM
If it's a Super Wal Mart, yes, it will provide groceries, most likely at a rate more affordable than most places. Wal-Mart is far from perfect, but the advantage of having one store have relative dominance is that Wal-Mart has been able to push a green (and efficient) agenda on its suppliers. If our economy was comprised of nothing but small-chain and independent stores, the supply chain would be hideously inefficient and fractured.

And let's be realistic. The reason why no small independent places will go to Elk Grove is because Elk Grove isn't designed for it, having screwed itself into a hole with its development strategy. Better for the citizens to have a cheap, centralized place to shop while they shore up their savings in order to get the duck out of Fodge rather than them driving up to Sacramento to do their bulk shopping.
1 0
REPLY
February 7, 2009 | 2:26 PM
obviously trapper and the other idiotic Wal Mart supporters have never read Stacy Mitchell's Big Box Swindle
0 2
REPLY
February 7, 2009 | 3:04 PM
Apparently bwrite can only believe what Stacy Mitchell writes because being objective is not what her book is about.
1 0
REPLY
edited on  February 7, 2009 | 11:39 PM
The problem is Walmart is organized and an organized org will trample an unorganized mom and pop any day of the week. Its the reality, sad but true. They have more marketing skill and more funds to crush the little guy.

This is the story or this universe I am afraid. It doesnt matter who is better. mom and pop stores find comfort in a nonexpansion state of being and this is their downfall. It was the native americans, and every poorly run nation that was gobbled up by the USSR. The better organized org always wins. Compete or die is the law of the land. It applies to organisms, individuals, families, shops, states, countries, planets, solar systems and on and on.

Does Walmart suck in the grand scheme of things? Yes, I have the honor of never spending a red cent there. But the question is who is going to step up and do better?

Big orgs that do are Trader Joes and Whole Foods INMHO. Support them.
1 0
REPLY
February 10, 2009 | 8:27 AM
Wal Mart is about profit. They will maximize that profit anyway, that's ANY way they can. I'm gonna stop because I can't spend anytime on this issue. Wal Mart will become the country's leading retailer of organic foods, but there's profit in it. They've tried to reclassify what qualifies as "organic". The Wal Mart in which I made purchases yesterday has both surly and friendly employees. Some good Wal Mart employees may not be employable elsewhere. I don't like shopping at Wal Mart. I appreciate the debate about Wal Mart in this thread. There are no easy answers.
0 0
REPLY
November 23, 2009 | 2:35 PM
I did like shopping at the supercenter walmart untill the prices went up 50%.
I no longer shop since I can't aford to. the prices are the same as bel air and not as fresh as belair
since the price is the same i'll just stay with belair for the freshness it offers
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background