STORYLINE Community Events

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Residents to discuss city budget at "Community Conversations"

by Nick Houser, published on June 10, 2010 at 8:30 PM

Storyline: Community Events RSS Feed

1 of 2
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 2
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image

"Community Conversations" will return July 13 to coffee houses all over Sacramento. The conversations are put on by the Sacramento Region Community Foundation, Capital Public Radio and The Sacramento Bee with the goal of bringing neighborhood residents together for civil discussion, learning each other's different perspectives on local issues.

Community Conversations began last month offering residents the chance to speak with fellow neighbors in coffee houses in areas such as Natomas, North Sacramento, Midtown, Land Park, Oak Park, College/Glen, Pocket Area and South Sacramento. Each location has one facilitator who keeps the dialogue flowing all while ensuring the house rules are followed and gives an outline of potential topics for discussion.

"It's a great civic model," said Ruth Blank, chief executive officer of the Sacramento Region Community Foundation. "It's not anonymous or online, it's not political. (Participants are) open-minded. They come to hear others' thinking."

The Sacramento Community Conversations follow the model of the University of the Streets Cafe in Montreal, Blank said. She added the motivation is to get people engaged with one another.

"The conversations are about creating civil discourse, to counter the trend of interactions online," said Joe Barr, director of news and information for Capital Public Radio.

Currently there are no plans for how often the Community Conversations will occur. However, Barr said the pilot conversation was well received judging by the amount of positive feedback.

Dustin Littrell, who attended the May 11 conversation at Temple Coffee in Oak Park, said he was "shocked at the number of people from the community."

"It was a great success of bringing a diverse group together," Littrell said. "It's a cool way to get a pulse of where people are, in different financial situations, directly affected (by the same issues). There were perspectives I've never thought of."

The May 11 conversations touched on education, transportation, the economy, local business, employment and local communities. Participants from the first event were invited to partake in an online survey to develop the July 13 topic, which is scheduled to discuss the city's budget cuts.

While Littrell and Barr both thought the first Community Conversation was successful, they also hope there will be a more diverse voice the next time around.

"The goal is to see if we could get people out to the coffee shops," Barr said. "To see how various communities feel about the same particular topic."

Littrell suggested holding the next event in a larger space, with seating in a circle to bring participants face to face with one another, and a longer run time. Currently the format is scheduled to run for one hour, though the May 11 conversations lasted around two.

All Community Conversations begin at 7 p.m. To read recaps from the May 11 conversations or to find locations for the July 13 event, visit the Sacramento Region Community Foundation website.

Images courtesy of Ruth Blank, Sacramento Region Community Foundation

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

June 10, 2010 | 10:04 PM
"Local issues" Are these city or county or both? While this can be an excellent way to engage people in such discussions, does it go beyond just talking? For example, are points voiced recorded and forwarded to the city manager and county executive officer?
4 0
REPLY
June 10, 2010 | 11:22 PM
Excellent questions. Personally I don't want to talk just to talk, in a coffee house like the sitcom Friends-lol now if there is going to be a movement of some sort count me in. I love to learn and see folks moving. But I have battles to fight and don't want to fight them on a threadmill not going anywhere.
2 3
REPLY
edited on  June 11, 2010 | 8:19 AM
What is their to discuss?

The City is spending more than they are taking in, story over.

Start by laying off 400 overpaid and worthless city employees.
4 3
REPLY
June 11, 2010 | 10:04 AM
The city has eliminated nearly twice that many positions, and now finds itself less able to do its business. Using the "cut cut cut" mentality ignores the fact that the current budget gap was caused by a dramatic loss of income via tax revenue. I know you don't like to discuss things because often the facts don't agree with your theories about how the world should work, but for those more interested in finding functional solutions than making the world match Randite rhetoric, they can be very productive.
4 4
REPLY
June 11, 2010 | 11:35 AM
Jim, laying off 400 employees who you may consider worthless or overpaid, will not really decrease the city budget-- since it will cause a need for more spending with additional saleries.... as we'll need even more law enforcement with the crime which occurs / increases as unemployment rises.
2 3
REPLY
June 11, 2010 | 11:37 AM
William, as always, excellent observation/ comment.
2 3
REPLY
June 11, 2010 | 8:51 AM
I think the idea of a "conversation" is wonderful. It's not intended to be a battle or debate. It's not intended to draw conclusions. As I understand it, these events are designed to get folks to step away from their battle lines and just simply talk with others in their community. There's a value in the art of conversation that is being lost in our society...perhaps a better way to put it is that conversation is being drowned out by the shouting. I am definitely looking forward to attending the upcoming conversation. And I intend to wear a very nice hat.
1 1
REPLY
June 11, 2010 | 11:31 AM
Stella I did not mean to imply that it was intended to be a battle nor debate. Nor do I expect everyone to have battles or needs to debate. And I do realize some people wake up with a Things to Do list while others wake up with a Battles to Fight list. I think people who have concerns, time, info to share just seek to learn, should attend and participate in discussions. I was speaking personally I can't do it. I've attended townhall forums, summits, workshops and discussions for several years and I personally need to move off a treadmill. But I don't see anything wrong with any one else who wants to attend. I hope lots of folks show up with big pretty hats.
3 2
REPLY
June 11, 2010 | 4:05 PM
I think conversation is wonderful but so is listening, which I find is often missing in the dialogue whether personal or political. From conversation and listening should come conclusions or solutions. Absent that Rhonda places it well into perspective: "treadmill."

Stella, more worrisome to me is that it seems there is an assumption that there are always some kind of battles being fought within neighborhoods or about issues which are the basis of meetings and conversations. While that may be true in some neighborhoods and discussions, that is not the case in all. There used to be conversations with various parties listening to each other. Civil compromise and solutions emerged. Is that no longer possible?
4 0
REPLY
edited on  June 11, 2010 | 5:11 PM
Dale, I really like your above post and heck yes, I agree. It's not that I have anything against talking circles heck, i looked forward to the Cornerstone conversation/ dialog that I was invited to attend, but I couldn't make. I can't wait for the next one; I'm excited. I'm told from it comes conversation, listening, conclusions or solutions. I look forward to meeting the people I so admire. I look forward to listening to the experiences of many.

But like you I'm more in favor of as you wrote " conclusions, solutions..more than talking" Again, Dale, I really like your comment
2 0
REPLY
June 11, 2010 | 2:59 PM
Every movement starts with a conversation.
3 0
REPLY
edited on  June 11, 2010 | 5:27 PM
I agree, and sometimes you can talk yourself in circles and sometimes people aren't looking for a movement..... Again, I think the event is nice, I've attended many talking circles and as far as I know they are still talking!! Heck, some have talked since 2005.... But some of us, myself included, have to pick and choose where we can go, what we can do, since their are always talking ciricles about one thing or another--- each having value. But thanks for sharing
2 0
REPLY
June 11, 2010 | 5:42 PM
Don't get me wrong I like Capital Public Radio. In fact I've been on it several times pertaining to youth violence and another community issue (I can't recall now what it was) So I am not dismissing the value of the converations. I'm just trying to move..........
1 0
REPLY
June 13, 2010 | 2:58 PM
To answer Dale, so far the conversations only relate to city-wide issues, but in speaking with Barr and Blank there is always the possibility to expand to county-wide issues.

Jim, the July 13 conversation will discuss the city budget but more specifically the question will be posed, "what are we willing to do without and what residents are willing to do about the rest?"

As for what happens with the results, they are not circulated or forwarded to any city officials. The goal is only to create the dialogue and receive varying opinions from different communities and community members.
1 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background