Tag Cloud
The accusations are flying at City Hall.
Councilman Ray Tretheway is accusing Mayor Kevin Johnson of quid pro quo in his endorsement process, while Johnson’s Special Assistant R.E. Graswich said that Tretheway’s allegations are lies.
Tretheway held a press conference Wednesday to announce that some of Johnson’s most influential supporters told him that if he voted to place a strong mayor proposal on the November ballot, then Johnson would endorse him.
Johnson has endorsed Tretheway’s opponent Angelique Ashby.
“Threats and quid pro quo offers may be commonplace these days,” Tretheway said, “but I want no part of it.”
Tretheway named names at the press conference. He said the following people representing Johnson pressured him to vote for a strong mayor proposal: developer Mark Friedman, developer Mike Heller, steel businessman Steve Ayers, developer Steve Goodwin, developer Jon Bagatelos and attorney Jeffrey Dorso.
Tretheway said that he was pressured when he recently met with some of the city’s key business leaders. “I was specifically told that if I put the strong mayor initiative on the ballot in November, the mayor would be ready to give me his endorsement and make certain I am reelected,” Tretheway said. “I don’t trade votes regardless of political consequences,” he said.
Asked by a reporter if the business leaders said they were acting on behalf of the mayor, Tretheway responded: “Yes, sir.”
Tretheway said he was not planning on making complaints about the matter, noting that Johnson was not directly involved. "I don't think there's anything illegal for somebody to speak on (Johnson's) behalf," Tretheway said.
After the press conference, Graswich said that Tretheway was lying. Graswich referred to a group of key Sacramento business leaders as “the group of 60.”
“He’s lying if he thinks the Sacramento 60 are somehow being directed by the mayor,” Graswich said. “It’s absolutely not true.”
Graswich said that Tretheway has lost the endorsement of the city’s public safety unions and the business community. Faced with the possibility of “losing his political career,” Tretheway is making up a story.
Graswich also pointed out that if Ashby wins office, she won’t begin until November. That would mean that she couldn’t vote to put a strong mayor decision on the ballot.
“If you think about it, why in the world would the mayor endorse Angelique, who, when, if ... she wins, won’t be taking office until the end of November?" Graswich said. "Why would he do that, unless his motives were to simply move the city forward?”
The fight isn’t limited to Tretheway and the mayor’s office: local politicians and powerful groups are taking sides. Council members Sandy Sheedy and Kevin McCarty, the Sacramento County Democratic Party and Bill Camp, the executive secretary of the Sacramento Central Labor Council, are supporting Tretheway’s claims and stood behind him at the press conference.
Sheedy said before the press conference that she believed Tretheway’s claims.
“Ray Tretheway is one of the most honorable men I know,” Sheedy said. “If he says it happened, it happened.”
Representatives from the Sacramento Police Officers Association and the Sacramento Area Firefighters Local 522 — two public safety unions that support Ashby — turned out for the press conference. SPOA Vice President Mark Tyndale rebutted Tretheway’s claims in comments to reporters.
In a phone interview Wednesday, developer Mark Friedman said Tretheway’s claims were false.
Friedman said he met with Tretheway and four others Tuesday morning. At the meeting, Friedman said he and the others discussed the strong mayor proposal and its merits, and talked about why they thought it should be placed on the ballot in November.
“We didn’t offer any promises and we didn’t make any threats,” Friedman said.
Friedman said the discussion did not include any mention of Tretheway’s City Council race or an endorsement by the mayor.
“It smells to me like some last-ditch act of political desperation,” Friedman said.
Jon Bagatelos also said Tretheway’s comments were lies. If Tretheway claims there was quid pro quo or that the group of business leaders said they would give him the mayor's endorsement that's a "total unequivocal lie,” Bagatelos said.
Bagatelos said that if Tretheway is referring to the meeting at which Bagatelos attended yesterday, then Tretheway is making defamatory comments.
Steve Ayers and Steve Goodwin also said they did not tell Tretheway that backing the strong mayor proposal could lead to an endorsement from Johnson.
Both Ayers and Goodwin described themselves as supporters of Tretheway. "I'm amazed and shocked," Ayers said.
Goodwin spoke positively about Tretheway, saying he was the best candidate for the District 1 City Council seat. "I have not heard what Ray said," Goodwin said. "But as far as any tit-for-tat — I wouldn't do that to Ray. I would hope he would know that."
Attempts made to contact Mike Heller and Jeffrey Dorso were unsuccessful.
Managing Editor Colleen Belcher contributed to this report.
Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.
The Sac Tree Foundation plainly appears to be nothing more than a shill organization to move money to Tretheway and to control his votes on the council. The Tree Foundation was started during the initial expansion of development in Natomas BY DEVELOPERS. It's called campaign finance money laundering - some call it racketeering and/or bribery.
Tretheway is NOT the nice grandfatherly environmentalist that he portrays...he spearheaded the development of that stucco hell called North Natomas. HE FOUGHT the Army Corps's attempts to halt development in flood plains. He spearheaded the efforts to turn irreplaceable farm land into stucco crap boxes. He personally spearheaded the DESTRUCTION of tens of thousands of acres of habitat for the Swanson Hawk. He PERSONALLY SPEARHEADED the development that has poured untold MILLIONS TO BILLIONS of gallons of contaminated street runoff into the Sacramento River with NO environmental mitigation measures. He spearheaded the city ordinance that concentrated low income housing ONLY in North Natomas- causing HUGE increases and unprecedented crime rates for his district.
No one in their right mind would vote for Tretheway, he needs to be put into retirement like Fargo was.
Ashby is by far the best candidate, but I fear that she will be sucked into the corruption and racketeering that controls our pathetic council. She has been a strong voice for the community, but once in office, the machine will quickly focus on buying her - that process has already started by the Police and Fire unions. That being said, she will at least have the opportunity to prove that she has integrity is an independent voice on the council; only time will tell what she does with this opportunity.
Ashby hasn't been 'sucked' into anything she wasn't a willing participant in -- she has snorted and snarled her way into the Natomas area for a LONG time, and the KJ-backing apparatus that is likely to rule the area is a thing of her own making, just as pathologically as any community's cancer.
We are witnessing the takeover of our city by very corrupt forces, with very little democratic about the governance they seek, in one of the most insidious power grabs ever brought to bear in Sacramento.
This is indeed a very sad era for our city.
Everything I have stated is based on a full years worth or research and is supported in thousands of pages of public documents that I have in my office; not on conjecture based on a political persuasion - as is virtually everything you post.
Speaking of someone who has nothing to do but comment on every article on the web....YOU!
Jim, so your research didn't tell you Tsakapoulos and his gang did what they wanted without any authority? what sources are you using?
Mr. Wee, "the original Natomas Community Plan" was not followed. Heather Fargo was a Natomas activist and later on the SAFCA Board "when Natomas went to absolute hell and the City did anything developers wanted out there."
I started the research because Tretheway proposed to revise the NNFP which would have led to HUNDREDS of millions of dollars in fee reductions to developers,(in totality over a few years - most in the community did not understand the total amount of reductions that Tretheway proposed) and the de-funding of long promised, but never built, public facilities - such as fire stations, parks, community centers etc.... If it wasn't for community activists fighting Tretheway and the current acting City Manager Gus Vina, (I think he was a city finance guy back then) Tretheway’s proposed changes to the NNFP would have been rubber stamped. Community leaders like Angelique Ashby, Keith Sharward and Lisa Kaplan, among several others, fought Tretheway’s proposal, and negotiated for a second fire station in North Natomas; a fire station that should have been built many years before with developer fees. (this is why the Firefighters endorsed Ashby) I still did not like the final version of the NNFP, in the end, the developers got almost everything they wanted in reduced fees and a reduction in the future development fee schedule.
Given Tretheways actions on the NNFP, no one in North Natomas should vote for him, he has screwed North Natomas, along with the rest of his district, six ways to Sunday. There is no question that he needs to be shown the door...the problem is most people in his district are unaware of what he has been up to.
Need we have a reiteration of KJ's compromised history yet again??? I think not...
Tretheway is indeed not a liar. KJ has been proved to be a liar, and a fraud, and a very poor manager of public welfare funds, and public largesse.
Tretheway erred in supporting KJ's wish to ballot the SMI, which is indeed the lightning rod issue this political season, but he has changed his mind, which is his right....
Ashby, on the other hand, had first opined against the SMI, but now that she's garnered KJ's support, has changed her mind, and she has that right. But it is questionable that someone seeking public office arrives at the table making such flipflops already prior to incumbency, especially after lambasting Tretheway's council functioning. It is also significant in demonstrating just how easily her support can be purchased, indicating integrity issues...
...especially with a charlatan like Maviglio in her aid.... now there MUST be some backstory to THAT one....
Tretheway is a decent and honorable person, and despite the hate mongering by Ashby and her camp over the years, I believe he can win this one, and I'm GLAD he brought out the backroom deal making that has gone on in this election cycle -- all at the hands of KJ and his corrupt backers....
Trethway says because he said he won't BE YOUR BOY. "If you think about it," your question is so stupid you don't WANT people to think about it. The stories about quid pro quo. All you got is bluster and distraction.
If Ray's claims are "lies" or "defamatory," let's encourage the Fascist (government as business) Club and developer cabal to SUE HIS ASS.
johnson always has a spokesman to cover for him, come out and say "the allegatoins are false" about sex with minors, abuse of Americorps program, misuse of Fed funds, fixed numbers/grades at St. HOPE, mistreatment of teachers, cult like behavior, departure of 40 Acres director, paying for signatures ......
RE, why the hell do you think anyone believes YOU? Or just the Fascist 60 will make everything all right?
I believe Tretheway. Besides, if no record was made of the transaction , it's he said vs they said.
I assume city council members receive various forms of pressure from individuals on a daily basis. Who calls a press conference to announce that you rebuffed someones proposal because it appeared underhanded. Very strange indeed.
Who has a front page story that they are a Gang of 60 who won't take no for and answer and whose spokesman responded to allegations about pressure from 6 of them, by talking about the Gang of 60. Very strange indeed.
Trethway knows how many pressured him. Maybe only 1 said the words and the other 59 just postured for the media.
"After the press conference, Graswich said that Tretheway was lying. Graswich referred to a group of key Sacramento business leaders as “the group of 60.”
“He’s lying if he thinks the Sacramento 60 are somehow being directed by the mayor,” Graswich said. “It’s absolutely not true.”"
http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/27480/Tretheway_backtracks_listen_to_audio_of_press_conference
Now even better - with audio!
Rich Rich, the difference is you won't see half as much fluff and fluffing on SP as the Bee. did you see that vanity piece on the Gang of 60 on Monday? Kneepad time.
and this same week the Gang of 60 came out swinging and braying that they won't take any less than the corrupt deals the previous city manger and dev. dept. gave them. speaking of kneepads.
If she truly were "the Johnson plant," she would have stated early on that she supported Strong Mayor. Instead, she spoke to council on the day of the vote and proclaimed how terrible the initiative was and that she would be voting it down and telling everyone she knew to do the same thing.
I guess for some people -- mostly online commenters and bloggers who don't even live in District One and are thus ineligible to vote for or against her -- this is a "single issue" election. But for those of us who live in District One, the vast majority of whom are are fed up with the lack of representation we have had on the council for many many years, the choice is clear and becoming even more clear as Tretheway grasps desperately at whatever he can to hang onto his power.
For the last several decades the path to the city council has been through narrow minded, single issue interest groups and so-called neighborhood associations. What we have to show for it is a city with no world-class amenities (what other city has a 14 acre zoo), stagnation while the surrounding areas prospered (these nimby's never figured out that their resistance to almost all development is as much responsible for the suburban sprawl as the land developers looking for a cheap buck)..neighborhoods like Oak Park that in spite of almost 40 years of 'redevelopment' has little to show for the millions of dollars wasted by SHRA.
It is time we elect folks to the council that will not just represent their individual interests, but remember they are there to lead their districts and the city forward. For District 5, Terrence Johnson is the only one that even comes close to that standard. I would urge all Sacramentans to use this standard when they vote. Maybe then we wouldn't be envying the turn around West Sacramento has made.
"... stagnation while the surrounding areas prospered (these nimby's never figured out that their resistance to almost all development is as much responsible for the suburban sprawl as the land developers looking for a cheap buck)"
Total lie.
Ashby has been silent on the issue of environmental issues and urban sprawl, this is a mistake on her part - she needs to use Tretheway’s record on these issues against him.
Ashby has also not taken a stand on the current annexation plans going forward that will take the City all the way up to the Sutter County line - The Council will PASS the annexation plan the SAME YEAR that the levies are repaired and the building moratorium is lifted - WATCH! And guess who owns almost all of the development options north of North Natomas? Yeah - the Greek Mob.
Anyone who is concerned about the environment should not even contemplate voting for Ray Tretheway, it's that simple.
Although General Plans are required by state law, proposals that are often laid out in General or Specific Plans do NOT have to be implemented, much of the time the plans are contingent on many economic and environmental factors (They must comply with CEQA) which are not specificlly contemplated within the plans. The Plans are basic blueprints that must comply with various state laws; that being said, they City also cannot arbitrarily violate their own Specific/General plans.
Most of the time these Plans are BS and developed only to comply with state law - sometimes though they can be used to sue the Cities and Counties if they violate their own plans, or if their plans violate state laws - which happens more often than you'd think.
The original Plans for Natomas (North and South) were basically thrown out the window under pressure by developers. Keep in mind that much of the infrastructure needed to develop the area would have been paid for through develper fees; so they did everything they could to make sure the infrastructure they did have to pay for was as limited as possible and what the public would allow. (In this town the public will alow virtualy anything) The developers control this town and decide who gets on the council; they have almost complete control over writing the General/Specific Plans; nothing in this town is done without their approval.
This is why we need to elect independent council members not beholding to developers - and in this town this is almost a fantasy.
I have some North Natomas land I'd like to sell you... cheap... when you have a moment....