STORYLINE Weekly Reflections From Philosophy Night

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images

          Have you ever instinctively known not to get involved with someone because of the way they make you feel? It’s not that they look unusual, or say anything particularly out of the ordinary, but nevertheless, there is a deep feeling of apprehension that can arise from being in someone’s presence. It is the same feeling that warns us not to walk down an alley at a certain moment even though we may have done so the evening before with no hesitation. I would describe this experience as an intuitive hunch or gut instinct. Apparently, cops get them all the time, and even rely on them quite heavily in certain situations. But how do we know it’s our intuitive instinct talking rather than some other force inside us? 

          Take an example. Say you meet an attractive person in a café and he or she wants to meet up with you later. How do you decide what to do? From my experience, there are three distinct ways to make decisions such as these. 

          The first involves emotion. When considering whether to accept or decline, we can be moved by a desire for gratification, from a place of want and the need for stimulation. Or perhaps a feeling of loneliness has worked its way in, a sensation of lack in which we perceive we must fill a certain type of whole.

          The problem with living on the basis of emotion is not that it's "wrong" or immature, but that ultimately it is impossible for all of our desires to be satisfied when and where we want them to be. It is also true that the feeling of lack at the foundation of most emotional decisions is unpleasant and tends to spread itself into other aspects of life, when each one of us is fully capable of producing positive feelings on our own by simply coming back into the moment.

          On the other hand, if our decision to go out is motivated by a belief about what is "right" and what is "wrong", about what we “should” or “should not” do, then logic is clearly in charge. In circumstances such as these we operate from a set of assumptions and beliefs about what we think is true or in our best interest at the time. This is problematic as well, however, because there will always be more factors to consider than we will have the time or ability to handle, while the premises we take for granted in deciding such issues with our intellectual facilties are seldom beyond question in the first place.

          When we set these elements aside, however, and allow our intuitive voice to be heard, there is a silent sense of conviction that arises. It is very fast and very clear. There is no debate, no fear, no loneliness, no need, just an internal knowledge of our own personal truth. This can inspire a feeling of excitement on some level, but the original source of an intuitive decision comes from a place of stillness and clarity rather than thought and desire. When the other voices are loud it can be difficult to pick out the truth, but it always expresses itself at least once if we have a ear to listen.

          What is the point of listening to our personal truth? This, I believe, is a question that one must answer based on one’s own experience, not the opinions of others. From my own experience I will say that I seldom feel quite so alive as I do when I'm living in line with the intuitive pulse of my life. Serendipitous things occur that I never could have planned for or thought up. I might stumble upon a great job by talking to someone I had a feeling I needed to talk to, or make a whole host of new friends. I’ve also noticed that I don't feel a sense of regret when I act on my intuitive knowledge. However things turn out, if I know I was coming from the right place when I made the decision, a sense of confidence and self-respect emerges, rather than the usual self-doubt and criticism.


          It can take a lick of courage to live in line with our intuition, and a touch of discipline as well. But at the end of the day I would certainly say that nothing could be more worth it!

 

- Stuart Campbell leads a Philosophy Night every Thursday at Weatherstone Cafe (21st and H) and a Philosophical Movie Night every Tuesday except the second Tuesday of the month at Firehouse 5 (9th between T and U). Both are open to the public.  

 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

CAM
Author thumbnail
January 27, 2009 | 11:24 AM
Mr. Campbell has, I think, cut to the very living heart of life when he acknowledges,

"...there is a silent sense of conviction that arises. It is very fast and very clear. There is no debate, no fear, no loneliness, no need, just an internal knowledge of our own personal truth. "

With the armor of opinion and the facade of habit, how can we find the courage to honestly cultivate intuition?

The writer asserts that the benefits are great. Indeed, "nothing could be more worth it!"

Try it out and see. Imagine what it would be, perhaps from a distance. When your intuition dawns, seize the day!

A breath of fresh air from Mr. Campbell. Hooray!

1 0
REPLY
January 27, 2009 | 12:32 PM
Or have you considered it could be a force outside of us?
0 0
REPLY
January 27, 2009 | 1:47 PM
It could be. What matters to me, however, is less where is comes from and more what is feels like, what it can do when I try it on for size!
1 0
REPLY
January 27, 2009 | 8:59 PM
II offer the hypothesis that almost ALL of our intuitions are mistaken as a matter of objective truth, but the disutility of being wrong IN MOST CASES is not significant enough to cause us concern. Moreover, our brains are good at learning things by trial and error, so even when we are mistaken our brains are using that data to help us make better choices in the future.

Being a prudent person is knowing when it is not safe any longer to trust your gut. When money and my immediate health and safety are on the line, I try to rely on more than just my intuition. But I haven't always. Sometimes there just isn't time to think through a situation and make a rational choice. If we had a 1000 year life span, we'd probably be better decision makers.
0 0
REPLY
January 28, 2009 | 10:36 AM
If we make a decision from a place of intuitive knowledge and it turns out to be objectively "wrong", what does this mean? It means that according to our personal believes about what is good for us, this does not fit in. But does it follow that we always know what is good for us?

I was in the subway system in Paris with my Mother one time in the mid 90's. We were on our way somewhere important when all of the sudden we got turn around heading the wrong direction. My mother got frustrated at herself for making such a obvious mistake. As it turned out, the train we missed, the one heading in OUR direction at that EXACT TIME, was loaded with explosives and was destroyed minutes later killing 62 people.

Just because we believe we know what is in our best interest, such as taking the train that is headed in OUR direction as opposed to the one headed in the exact OPPOSITE direction, does it really follow that we do? I would say it is our INtUITION we should consider to be our ultimate survival instinct, not indeed our logic.

I would also be careful about attributing subtle emotional impulses to ones intuition. This is a very common problem and can cause confusion. The difference is explained in the article.
1 0
REPLY
January 29, 2009 | 5:21 PM
It sounds like you describing a kind of magical thinking. Magical thinking is fine for deciding whether or not to hook up with the fox from the cafe (I actually see zero dilemma here; isn't the answer obviously "hells yeah?"), but what if you are George W. Bush and have to decide whether or not to invade Iraq? Do you weigh the known evidence as objectively as you can? Or do you go with your intuitive knowledge?

To some degree, we may be talking about apples and oranges, but my point is that I think you are romantizing intuition too much and dismissing rationalism too readily. Consider this. Studies of infants show that babies show a marked preference for the faces of people of their same race and the vocal accents that their parents have. Therefore, there may be something deeply intuitive about racism and tribalism, but that does not justify these banes of humanity. In this case, you are morally obligated to reject your deep-seated fear and distrust of the Other and do your best to judge people on a person by person basis. In other words, it is your duty to be rational.
0 0
REPLY
January 29, 2009 | 5:27 PM
Here a link to a video that discuses those studies about infant psychology.

http://bramble.tumblr.com/post/67179052/what-experimental-psychology-tells-us-about-how
0 0
REPLY
January 31, 2009 | 3:20 PM
What is being claimed in this article in that there is a difference between intuitive and emotional impulses, i.e. impulses based on ones emotional needs for attention, stimulation, comfort, etc. and impulses grounded in a silent sense of conviction that arise from a place of personal connection. This is not magic.

It leads me to believe this distinction is not understood when one implies that to follow ones intuition would be to "hook up with a fox" at the nearest cafe. Why do people most often hook up with foxes at cafes? For simple stimulation. This is not intuition, it is emotion in control, apple and oranges indeed.

The same goes for baby prejudice as well. It is true that their aversion to foreign Mommies is not rational, it is EMOTIONAL, based in the FEAR of what is not familiar. This is not intuition, nor is it a claim against it.
0 0
REPLY
February 2, 2009 | 1:48 PM
I enjoy reading articles and discussions like this because philosophy and psychology are important. These topics are difficult to talk about for a couple of reasons: while the search for meaning in life and an understanding of "who am I" are universal, the experiences are ultimately very personal; the terms and concepts used in these fields are slippery and difficult to define precisely. So misunderstandings are rife when discussing philosophy and psychology and one must be careful not to fall into semantic posturing.

So what is intuition? Not feeling. Not intellect. Not gut.
Ever have the "awareness" that someone was watching you .... like eyes on your back? Or - try staring at someone walking down the street and see if they glance back. People do have an awareness that isn't pure intellect or pure emotion. There are many words that are approximations of "intuition" - if not synonymous: conscience, spirit, holy ghost, gut, feeling, impulse...

Does the author's understanding of intuition fall somewhere on the awareness spectrum between intellect (brain) and emotion (heart) or is it not on the spectrum at all?

1 0
REPLY
edited on  February 2, 2009 | 6:33 PM
Thanks for the comment Marc. I would not place intuition on a spectrum between reason and emotion. Almost the opposite in fact. From my experience, the three are quite autonomous. An emotional decision (based on the need for stimulation) is distinct from a rational decision (based on a set of beliefs about right and wrong) which, in turn, is distinct from an intuitive decision (based on a silent sense of conviction about what to do).

Intuition is a form of feeling indeed. It's the gut impulse to turn left, to reject an offer, to take a job, avoid an alley, or choose one apartment over another. It is not based on desire, nor is it based on calculation. It seems to transcend both of these.

It is a personal claim on my part to say that when I listen for and live in line with this feeling of intuitive truth, my life goes more smoothly. This is for others to consider and try out on their own if they so decide.
1 0
REPLY
February 5, 2009 | 8:10 AM
Fail better.

- Beckett
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background