STORYLINE Development

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

West Sac mayor champions major development projects

by Kathleen Haley, published on March 31, 2010 at 8:03 PM

Storyline: Development RSS Feed

1 of 2
close

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

1 of 2
Loading images
Slideshow image Slideshow image

Christopher Cabaldon is at the helm of an evolving city. The West Sacramento mayor said the city should be a place where families can raise children, but also a spot where young people want to be.

City leaders are taking a positive view of developing West Sacramento, he said.

“We’re not one of those cities that has a no-growth faction on the City Council and a growth faction,” Cabaldon said. “Everyone believes that there’s a lot of potential. The shape and pace of growth is always a question everywhere, and that’s true in West Sacramento as well.”

In one major example of West Sacramento’s growth, the City Council in February approved a 386-unit housing project that will be located in the city’s Bridge District at the riverfront.

The housing project is part of West Sacramento's plan to eventually bring housing and commercial development to 188 acres that make up the Bridge District. The development project could span 12 million square feet, a city staff report said.

Cabaldon, 44, is a single and openly gay leader who said he enjoys urban nightlife. As someone who is not married with children, his perspective is useful because the city and region are trying to attract creative people and young people, he said in a March 24 interview.

He credits recent Sacramento growth for paving the way in West Sacramento.

“Sacramento has changed dramatically, particularly in Midtown, and to some extent in downtown, over the last decade," Cabaldon said.

The Sacramento growth in the central city means that West Sacramento's Waterfront and West Capitol Avenue have potential, he said. "Because it's already been proven that this region can support and make successful that kind of development," he said.

Cabaldon said West Sacramento wants to make major upgrades to its downtown.

The city’s downtown is ripe for development, according to Cabaldon, because it “never really existed.”

Cabaldon said he wants the city’s future downtown to be walkable — a place where people can buy flowers and bump into people they know.

“We want to grow and create a real urban, but small-town downtown,” he said.

At the same time, the city is focusing on practical development projects, such as levee upgrades , said West Sacramento City Councilman Oscar Villegas.

The city is working on strengthening its levees to meet federal 200-year flood protection standards, Villegas said. The levee work is useful in the city’s efforts to bring in businesses, homebuilders and commerce, he said.

West Sacramento will have a competitive advantage when it can tell companies that may move to the city that the levees are secured, Villegas said.

Meanwhile, the city also wants to make subtle upgrades in its historic Bryte and Broderick neighborhoods, Cabaldon said.

“In the Bridge District, I’m trying to get ... $100 million for infrastructure,” Cabaldon said. “In Broderick, it’s just as important to find somebody to open up a cool, independent coffee house with some couches that local neighbors can sit around and gossip with each other at. There aren’t that many places like that.”

Image of developer Mark Friedman's planned 386-unit West Sacramento housing development courtesy of Friedman and the Fulcrum Property Group.

Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.

 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

April 1, 2010 | 12:03 AM
This makes one wonder, for a town that does not have high property values, where is all the money for development going to come from? Let me guess, the whole town is in a "redevelopment zone" which means that the taxpayers are going to be forced at gunpoint to subsidize wealthy developers.... yawn, so typical of liberals.....tax people to death in order to give corporate developers welfare checks. I wonder, gee who has donated to Calbadon's campaigns? Unions and developers....
2 2
REPLY
April 2, 2010 | 3:53 PM
What's the right place for tax money to be invested? How about roads, sidewalks, sewers, storm drains, flood control? Because that's where it's actually going, not into developer's pockets.
0 0
REPLY
April 2, 2010 | 11:08 PM
Your partially correct. Developers need hundreds of millions in tax payer funded infrastructure, tax breaks and often free redevelopment land. The developers make huge profits on the developemnts that would not go forward without tax payer funded public infrastructure.

Developers should pay for all infrastructure required to develop their projects. Why should citizens be forced at gun point to subsidize corporate profits?

1 0
REPLY
April 1, 2010 | 6:42 AM
Great things take time.

West Sac has needed this infusion of political, social, economic capital and will for a LONG time, after recent fits and starts to develop a few unique projects, after a few failed master plans, and after a LONG history of a kind of dumpy across the river lesser sister city to the Capitol -- the one everybody knows about but hides -- it appears that a confluence of events *may* just turn the red-headed step child city into a viable metropolitan being.

This sort of thing is what SHOULD be subsidized by taxpayer funds -- efforts to clean up and revitalize areas of blight, hopefully at a reasonable cost, and with actual economic sustainability at the end of the long development tunnel... building not just for the sake of building stuff, but building toward a strategic goal of a suitable industrial use of the area that will outlive the financial and other logistics that bring the project into being....

...unlike the 'arena', which has no particular strategic purpose apart from catering to the wishes of irresponsible team owners and overpaid team players and the egos of ridiculous wannabe politicos and the covert greed of their backers...
1 3
REPLY
April 1, 2010 | 10:59 PM
There may be other strategic purposes...did you see this article by Matt Taibbi?

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/32906678/looting_main_street/print

Hmmm....didn't KJ bring someone from Goldman Sachs to town, explaining that they were going to help finance the arena project?
1 0
REPLY
April 2, 2010 | 1:19 AM
Yep, I sure did see Taibbi's article(s) on GS, and yep, KJ sure did invite GS to lend what's left of its Wall Street imprimatur to the arena project, no doubt to counter concerns about its financial house of cards involving capital firms awash in mortgages for overvalued property, cynically hoping that ussin's are too dumb to be aware of world financial markets and the implications of an impending commercial mortgage meltdown that could have serious detrimental effects on this project necessitating public backing, and it's true that there may very well be other strategic purposes that lie outside this city's boundaries, including opportunities for GS to trade the bonds and other loan facilities incorporated in this deal and others that will no doubt manifest later...

It's all so wannabe Michael Bloomberg it's nauseating...
1 1
REPLY
April 2, 2010 | 7:48 AM
William, the taxpayers of this City are going to finance the Arena, not GS - nothing will be built without public bonds and/or loan gurantees.
2 0
REPLY
edited on  April 2, 2010 | 4:08 PM
Jim: Cities aren't banks--they don't issue loans. They get banks to issue loans...and, as you may find out if you read the article, sometimes the city defaults, but the banks (and the buddies of the politicians who convinced the city to take out the loans) still get paid, by the taxpayer.

http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/22032/Mayor_lauds_Goldman_Sachs_work_Cohn_sues_the_bank
0 0
REPLY
April 6, 2010 | 2:35 PM
Actually in the Kamilos three-card monty 'land swap' 'deal', a tax increment is included as a 'just in case' measure against the failure of any part of the scheme, and it could potentially act as a direct subsidy... which makes this whole arena thing just more of a bad idea....
0 0
REPLY
September 26, 2010 | 2:21 PM
Mayor Cabaldon should be commended for his leadership. West Sacramento is fast becoming the "go to" city in our region.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background