STORYLINE Regional Issues

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Regional Transit board cuts: slower light rail, fewer buses

by Kathleen Haley, published on March 29, 2010 at 10:48 PM

Storyline: Regional Issues RSS Feed

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

Dozens of bus routes in the Sacramento region will vanish and light rail will slow down on the weekends as a result of sweeping Regional Transit budget cuts. The agency’s board of directors slashed bus, light rail and paratransit service Monday night to resolve a $10.6 million deficit.

One of the major budget fixes scales back night service seven days per week. The RT board decided that light rail, bus and paratransit trips that now begin after 9 p.m. will cease.

Public transportation will also be slower on weekends. Right now, light rail picks up passengers in 15-minute cycles during the weekend. The cuts mean that riders can catch the light rail every 30 minutes on weekends, explained Mike Wiley, RT’s general manager and CEO.

Cuts will take effect June 20.

While the board cut paratransit trips that begin after 9 p.m., that decision could be changed. Board Member Don Nottoli asked RT staff to look into ways that paratransit riders could take later rides.

Some paratransit riders expressed concern at the Monday meeting that they could be left on the street if they were out late.

Pamela Ross of Sacramento said that she takes paratransit late at night when she comes home from summer vacations. Ross, who uses a wheelchair and has two service animals, was worried that she wouldn’t have a paratransit ride home from the train station. She said she “really didn’t want to sleep in the train station at night.”

RT works with a private firm, Paratransit, Inc., to provide transit service for disabled residents.

The cuts yield $11.7 million, nearly $1 million more than the deficit, Wiley said. That extra million provides “wiggle room,” he said.

Wiley said that million-dollar cushion could be necessary because there are many assumptions in RT’s budget plans. The agency previously had a $25 million deficit, he said. The deficit number changed because recent state legislation moved $11.8 million to the agency. Before Monday, RT made more cuts and also found some new revenue opportunities, Wiley said. The state money, new revenue possibilities and new cuts brought the deficit down to $10.6 million, he explained.

However, the numbers are not set in stone, Wiley said. The new revenue possibilities — which include funds RT is hoping to receive from the federal government — will need to pan out.

An RT report for Monday’s meeting said the following weekday bus routes will disappear: 4, 8, 9, 10, 18, 20, 36, 50E, 63, 73, 83, 89, 94, 95, 100, 101, 102, 104, 106, 107, 141, 142, 200, 201, 210, 226, 251, 261

The report states that the following Saturday routes will end: 5, 6, 8, 13, 14, 16, 24, 28, 54, 61, 65, 74, 143

The following Sunday routes will stop service: 8, 13, 14, 22

Some bus routes will also have slower service on weekends.

Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

March 30, 2010 | 9:40 AM
Was there any discussion about the wisdom of price increases and the affect of those on the sale of fares?

I know the price of my trip has gone from 50c to $2.50 in recent years. Add a connection and it would be much more.

It would seem that demand for public transit is elastic if the price changes are dramatic. It would also seem that a larger proportion of riders would hold discount passes offered by community colleges and employers.

So were the price increases worth it? Was that a winning strategy or was RT doomed from the start having so many funds cut out from under them?
2 0
REPLY
March 30, 2010 | 9:49 AM
public transportation !
a great way to show us how government health care will work!
3 3
REPLY
March 30, 2010 | 7:50 PM
RT could be funded by higher parking rates in the grid and higher parking fines county wide.
0 0
REPLY
edited on  April 7, 2010 | 12:15 PM
The funds for parking are already abysmally high and the parking fines are even more insane. Anyone working downtown that does not have a lush legal assitant or corporate job knows about the three hour reparking rule or paying fifteen bucks (that's about 2.5 hours of work at minimum wage mind you) for parking. A lot of the meters don't even work downtown and I've seen and know plenty of people that have had to pay fines for it. RT should be better managed and reading the most recent budget report on their website demonstrates that they are starting to get that idea by cutting unecessary jobs and hours. I do think they could of done a much better job of it though, especially when regards to weekend routes.
0 0
REPLY
April 1, 2010 | 3:50 PM
Why would I trade in my monthly pass for a downtown lot for a light rail pass if I can't take the train to east sac after 9pm?
0 0
REPLY
May 5, 2010 | 1:58 PM
Just when we get done complaining about how RT service takes you essentially nowhere, yet has one of the highest and continually rising base fares in the state, they yank the rug from under jobseeker's feeble feet again, and announce that once you find that job that in a distant area, you'd better make sure it's bankers, or should I say, state workers hours! ...Sighs.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background