STORYLINE Sacramento City Hall / Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

City Council 2010: Realtor/community volunteer runs for District 3 seat

by Kathleen Haley, published on March 26, 2010 at 7:08 PM

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

City Council candidate Chris Little said his top goal as a council member would be to ensure that city business is transparent to the public.

The Sacramento Press is interviewing City Council candidates in advance of the June 8 election.

Little, 48, works as a Realtor in East Sacramento and is running for the District 3 seat held by Councilman Steve Cohn. The district includes neighborhoods in downtown, Midtown and East Sacramento.

Little, who is a third-generation Sacramentan, earned his bachelor’s degree from the University of Oregon.

He is president of the East Sacramento Chamber of Commerce and chairman of the American River Parkway Advisory Committee, which advises the county.

If elected, Little said one of his priorities will be fire and police services.

“We need to have levels of service that ... make people feel safe,” he said, “so they know when they call 911 they’re going to get a quick response.”

Little said the city also needs to consider how growth will affect public safety services, adding that new challenges in that arena will come with higher density and high-rise development.

Little said he wants Sacramento to become a sought-after location for medical education and training, and research and technology.

He praised the nursing programs at California State University, Sacramento, and local community colleges and pointed out that the University of California at Davis has an “excellent” medical school.

“As a Sacramento region, we can become, in effect, sort of a Silicon Valley of medicine,” he said. “And I’d like to see us push that as an economic engine."

On a different topic, Little said he wants to work with leaders in education to bring a high school to District 3.

“I think (District 3 neighbors) have a legitimate concern about ... where to send their children to school,” he said.

Of his race against an incumbent, Little said he would offer a “fresh perspective."

Little said he does not want to be a longtime City Council member, adding that he favors term limits. Incumbent Cohn is running for a fifth term.

Little's campaign has raised $19,710. Cohn has raised $78,372, the most money in the District 3 race. Building contractor Shawn Eldredge has raised $11,363 and Jeff Rainforth, an employee of Best Buy, has not raised any money.

Read about Eldredge here. An article about District 1 candidate Angelique Ashby can be found here. Information about District 1 candidate Efren Guttierrez' campaign is here.

Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

edited on  March 27, 2010 | 11:31 AM
The Silicon Valley of Medicine is a fresh idea. I like the medical training, education, research and technology... A high school in District 3 could be a good idea....If their are enough youth for a high school DOES he also have ideas on youth activities, programs... that he should want to also see in his district? Or does he consider public safety simply officers saturating communities??? In LA the people screamed we need more officers and they got them and the crime increased like crazy when young people begin to behave like they were treated- like suspects!- self fulfilling prophecy... and now they are asking for less officers and more programs, opportunities... Why is it so many people think 'we need more officers' when it's a simple reaction, for a complex problem? It's lazy, it's throwing the problem off on to someone else so you can blame someone else. I'd like to hear more of the "level of services that make people feel safe" To what extent is he willing to go? What does he consider safe? Is it a neighborhood with towers, fences, armed guards additional surveillance cameras for the land of the free and home of the brave??? I don't get it the SPD site which shows call activity for the area doesn't warrant additional officers but hey come budget time I guess we'll hear of more crime... and more officers to enhance departments and build political careers....
3 3
REPLY
March 27, 2010 | 8:47 AM
great - a real estate agent

police and fire - yadda yadda yadda - save the children - yadda yadda yadda

why cant this city feild candidates that are refreshing and have broader visions other than to pimp development to line their pockets.

5 3
REPLY
March 27, 2010 | 10:20 AM
I have met and talked to Chris Little. I've got to say, I like the guy. He's quiet, but he has great and innovative ideas for our area; this little blurb doesn't do them justice. He's definitely right about the high school issue which is one of the top problems in our area if you're a parent. He's lived here his whole life and has a lot of connections and knows a lot of people. I am sick and tired of Steve Cohn. I can't wait to get that blow-hard off the council.
6 1
REPLY
March 29, 2010 | 10:20 AM
agreed!

(Hi Susie!)
0 0
REPLY
March 27, 2010 | 3:43 PM
High School solution is simple. Give the Sacramento High School campus back to the public that has attended and/or paid for it all these years.
9 3
REPLY
March 28, 2010 | 9:09 AM
Yeah so it can turn back into the gang infested rat hole that failed students - great idea.

AND BTW SAC HIGH IS A PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL - what you meant to say was return it to UNION control.
3 6
REPLY
March 28, 2010 | 12:11 PM
St. HOPE is not Sac High.
Charter Schools are not Public Schools.
Sacramento Charter High School is not Sacramento High School.
The current "Sac High" is not a "public high school," it is a public charter school.
The real Sac High was closed illegally a year early and given to Kevin Johnson.
Sacramentans sued the Sacramento City Unified School District.
SCUSD has still not -- after 7 years -- provided the court-ordered high school, for half of Sacramento's central neighborhoods.
St. HOPE is underperforming and cannot validate its presence SQUATTING on the Sacramento High School campus that is owned by the public and the central city neighborhoods.
The campus is underutilized; The field, swimming pool and auditorium (the last two abandoned by Johnson and allowed to deteriorate in disuse) are meant to serve the community and a comprehensive public student body.
The facility should be given back to the community that paid for it; including the State Bonds that were voted for $27 M in renovations, just before Johnson's SCUSD cronies (voted out for corruption, although one is running for City Council now) gave him the campus.
5 1
REPLY
edited on  March 29, 2010 | 12:21 AM
blah blah blah .... under the California education code all charter schools are public schools ...period.

You mean they are not public schools ran by corrupt unions.

"close illegally" LOL LOL LOL yeah, by the State of California - what a laugh.
1 5
REPLY
March 29, 2010 | 9:35 AM
Jim, you're wrong about the school being closed by the state. It's pretty obvious you hate unions, blah blah blah and that you will spew your rhetoric without any actual clue about what you're speaking about. You don't live in the area, you were not affected by what happened, and you aren't paying for it with your taxes. Please stop - your arguments aren't totally factually correct.

Perhaps if you did some actual research on this, you may learn a thing or two and then I bet you'd feel rather foolish; but then again, probably not. I get the impression you don't try to learn or reflect.
5 0
REPLY
March 29, 2010 | 10:25 AM
Marian,

I have an excellent reference for you with regard to the charterization of public education in general, and St. Hope, specifically.....

Diane Ravitch's THE DEATH AND LIFE OF GREAT AMERICAN SCHOOLS is a BOMBSHELL critique of the charterization movement by a former conservative now progressive education guru whose CSPAN interview was broadcast recently, and whose book has become a bestselling guide to dumping the charter schools in favor of dealing with broader issues like poverty,etc., and MAKING PUBLIC SCHOOLS PUBLIC ONCE MORE.... I have it on order, and if you get a chance to see her CSPAN interview, it's a devastating indictment of organizations like ST HOPE that have attempted to gut public ed in favor of privatization...

ANYONE interested in this topic MUST read this very important work!!!!
3 1
REPLY
March 29, 2010 | 11:18 AM
Hi bbbbmer! I am waiting to get that book as well. It's funny, because I was talking to Marion on the phone last night and told her about Diane Ravitch's book. I have enjoyed looking at her facebook page as she has a lot of links to different articles she's written. In fact, here's the address: http://www.facebook.com/DianeRavitch
4 0
REPLY
edited on  March 29, 2010 | 1:54 PM
JimKnapp, your statement -- even with a "period" -- is incorrect. Some charter schools are public charter schools. They are not public schools. Not all charter schools are public charter schools. There are significant distinctions. Those who try to blur those distinctions are part of the nationwide, top down agenda to gut the public school system and replace public schools with privatized and/or charter schools.
3 0
REPLY
edited on  March 27, 2010 | 4:17 PM
Nice, he's likable, quiet and has lived here all of his life. That describes thousands of people in District Three. BUT where has he been hiding when it comes to city issues these past many years? Busy selling real estate? That is hardly a qualification. In fact, in the minds of several voters i know, that is a big red flag that waves boldly. What does he know about how a city government operates? How many times has he been to council--either as an observer or to speak on issues that are important to his neighborhood and midtown? Where does he stand on quality of life issues for all of our business and residential neighborhoods.

Both Cohn and Eldredge have been visible. Cohn you can vote on his record--like him or like it or not. Eldredge--you can vote on his business and neighborhood record--like him or like that record or not. But vote for an invisible man with "connections" who suddenly materializes and runs for council? "Connections" with whom and for what reason? That is seriously worrisome. Our mayor had/has connections too. Has that been good or bad? Opinions vary widely on that.

Frankly, we don't know anything about this candidate. What does he plan to do for the voters to get to know him and where he stands on so many important issues--other than the safe PD and fire? Time is short--the primary is just around the corner.
9 0
REPLY
March 29, 2010 | 9:29 AM
Dale, I understand and appreciate your concerns; however, I have spoken with him, heard about all he's done for the community, heard about his ideas, etc. so I'm basing my opinion on what I have learned. As I stated earlier, this blurb doesn't do him justice. I didn't know Chris personally, but I knew who he was. I have seen him at countless community meetings and events throughout the years. He's been very active in the community. Now, when I say community, I mean the East Sac community. I know you are very active in your immediate community but I have never seen you or heard of you until the Sac Press. It doesn't mean you're not active, it just means people from other neighborhoods may not know all you've done. When I say he's 'connected', I mean it in the best sense of the word- he's connected to regular folks because of his history with all of his community service and committees. He has some great fresh ideas for the area. I admit it, I was impressed with him. He's not polished or a schmoozer but that's not what I'm looking for in a candidate.

I see a lot of Chris LIttle signs around the neighborhood which shows his immediate neighborhood appreciates and knows him. He's been knocking on doors, etc. My neighbor hosted Chris at her house and I came to learn about him. Perhaps you can visit him during his office hours and find out how he plans to reach out to the other communities in district 3.

When asked why he was running, he put it simply. He said that Steve Cohn has done a lot of good for our district, but it was time for someone else to step in. He said no one has contested Steve in a long time so he thought maybe he should.

I'm glad somebody is doing it. It's time...
3 1
REPLY
March 27, 2010 | 9:33 PM
I hope you can topple Steve Cohn, Chris. That guy is a career politician who does not bring fresh idea to the table and thinking like he use to.

Good luck!
4 4
REPLY
April 1, 2010 | 2:57 PM
Oh darn... I guess my comment comparing the political connivance of the current incumbent to the dimly lit intellect of the 'Led Zep' guy was removed... I tried to put it as politely as I could, but it's kinda hard to do so when such words so perfectly characterize each....
2 0
REPLY
April 22, 2010 | 2:23 PM
How come every discussion that I ever read at this site somehow is directed to a discussion about Sac High? This article is not solely about Sac High. There are some angry parents in East Sac.....we get it. Stick to commenting on those articles and save the hatred.
3 1
REPLY
May 11, 2010 | 11:04 PM
Can someone link me to an article(s) that clearly states Steve Cohn's views in regards to our now missing public high school? I personally don't agree with trying another go at Sac City, it obviously didn't work out too well the first time. So far I feel the best solution is here http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/newhighschool/
0 0
REPLY
June 4, 2010 | 9:22 AM
I don't remember who came before Steve Cohn but that individual really did support our district. I'm not convinced that either candidate is well qualified other than needing a guaranteed salary. Real estate agent...aren't they like used car saleman? As for Sac High, there has been talk of relocating West Campus High School there. They'll kick anyone out who misbehaves at West Campus so you won't get the usual riffraff.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background