STORYLINE City of Sacramento Department of Transportation

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Thousands of jobs coming soon to the Railyards

by Linda Tucker, published on March 4, 2010 at 3:52 PM

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images

The City of Sacramento and its private development partner, Thomas Enterprises, Inc., are requesting bids beginning today for a much anticipated marquee project, which will mean thousands of jobs in the area this summer.

The Track Relocation Project constitutes a series of new railroad tracks, passenger platforms, and three tunnels. The request for bid is available on the City’s webpage at http://www.cityofsacramento.org/generalservices/procurement/bids/ under “Construction Bids."

“With this project out to bid, we are looking forward to breaking ground in mid-May on one of the largest public works projects in the state this summer and certainly one of the largest in the City’s history,” said Mayor Kevin Johnson.

The project at the downtown Railyards will require constructing and realigning freight and passenger tracks 500 feet north. The project will also allow more freight trains through Sacramento at more efficient speed and facilitate the expected surge in regional rail ridership, particularly between the Bay Area and Sacramento. With the current tracks out of the way and access provided, the gateway will open for housing, shops, museums and entertainment venues being developed by Thomas Enterprises and for future expansion of the depot into a world class regional multi modal transportation center.
 

Last month, the City and Thomas Enterprises bid out the construction of two pedestrian routes connecting the Railyards with Old Sacramento and downtown; three bridges over the tracks at 5th and 6th streets; and a construction management firm. These projects, the tracks and other road construction along with the historic Central Shops abatement work total a public investment of approximately $115 million, which should sustain or create nearly 3,300 jobs over two years (according to the FHWA formula of one job per $35,000 investment). Approximately $30 million are federal stimulus dollars. Work on roads and utilities
within the Railyards funded by state Proposition 1C dollars began last year by Thomas Enterprises.

Johnson thanked Democratic Rep. Doris Matsui of Sacramento, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, the California Transportation Commission, Caltrans, the California Department of Housing and Community Development, the Sacramento Area Council of Governments, Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority and Amtrak for helping Sacramento secure the funds for this critical project.

 

Linda Tucker is the public information officers for the City of Sacramento Department of Transportation.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

edited on  March 4, 2010 | 4:56 PM
Geeezus H Krist

There will not be "thousands of jobs” for this phase of the project.

"...$115 million, which should sustain or create nearly 3,300 jobs over two years (according to the FHWA formula of one job per $35,000 investment)...”

Do you have any Idea how much workers get paid under federal Davis Bacon or state prevailing wage laws? On average it's 75-95K per year PER employee - that blows their formula fast doesn't it?

But more to the point, you don’t understand how they do their calculations...there may be a couple of hundred hired for this particular project...and they may not even be local hires, doubtful they will be, we dont have that many skilled experienced railroad workers....the rest, THEORETICLLY would be jobs "created" by money being spent in the region. The problem with this theory is that most of the material will most likely be shipped in...So those jobs would be in other communities. AND the FHWA formula is only a rough formula, and has little to do with the realities of individual projects.
3 4
REPLY
March 4, 2010 | 5:38 PM
Wow, you blew their formula out the water, and a job well done i might add..
3 5
REPLY
March 4, 2010 | 11:37 PM
Now if we could only blow this damn project out of the water. This will be a transportation nightmare. Thanks Sacramento, for permanently F-ing up the railroad tracks by placing them out in the middle of bump-F Nowhere.
0 2
REPLY
March 5, 2010 | 7:58 AM
The folks who make their livings designing transit...places like Amtrak, Sacramento Regional Transit, Union Pacific, the City's Department of Transportation, Caltrans, SACOG, even State Parks...all disagree Cactus. Matter of fact, they all agree this transit project is one of the most important in the region. The State agrees, the City agrees, the Feds agree, your representatives have lobbied long and hard to get funding from outside the region to be allocated here in Sacramento. Now, maybe they all have it wrong...or maybe, there's a larger vision in play, one that actually does work for the region.
5 0
REPLY
edited on  March 5, 2010 | 10:36 AM
Several years ago Developers and Union Pacific told the city "straighten" the tracks (move them to the north) or no deal on the sale or development of the area. What was the real reason behind it? Toxicity of the soil. All of the land where the station is standing and to its east can be developed for office buildings with very little clean up costs, but anything to the north would incur large amounts of money to clean the toxic mess that Southern Pacific polluted all those decades.

So don't blame the city--blame UP and developers. Absent bending to their demands, neither cared if the area ever got developed.
1 0
REPLY
March 6, 2010 | 9:09 AM
Dale if I remember correctly the tracks had to be moved to facilitate frieght lines as the current track bend was too sharp and didnt facilitate large trains/ cars etc. ??? & if we were to increase or even continue use of the heavy tracks that it was a "have to" . I am sure someone else on this thread remembers this during the many stakeholder meetings of the past..?
0 0
REPLY
March 7, 2010 | 10:02 AM
The track move is, in part, a means to allow freight trains to run through at higher speeds--the current "dog leg" was intended only for passenger trains when it was first built. Freight trains used an old alignment similar to the planned alignment, but it was taken out sometime in the 1970s or 1980s when railroads saw less traffic than they do now. The current setup is a very sharp curve for through freights. It will also allow freight trains to operate on a separate set of tracks from passenger trains. A side effect is that it will make the platform longer, to handle longer passenger trains.
0 0
REPLY
March 5, 2010 | 11:45 AM
Like the proverbial elephant on the living room sofa, an issue is ignored. Talking about corporate welfare. Taxpayers are paying the multi-million dollar cost of moving tracks belonging to Union Pacific. UP should return the favor. Pay the cost of a new arena, I mean, "entertainment center!."
1 1
REPLY
March 5, 2010 | 1:46 PM
True...taxpayers are paying.

That means the taxpaying population of California's 38 million people, mostly from LA and SF, are paying for work here in Sacramento..just as the majority approved at the ballot box. Sacramento hasn'y been very competitive in securing state bond money...until now. About time.

And contrary to the Jim Knapp's comment, virtually ALL of the money awarded to date has gone to local firms. As Linda's article says, bids are out now for the big awards, we'll see how that goes.
2 0
REPLY
edited on  March 5, 2010 | 7:26 PM
Rich, are the local firms hiring local folks? I know many, including myself, looking for employment. I haven't seen too many local firms hiring in the classified ads and I've seen many laying off folks. If all the money awarded to date has gone to local firms is their a way to determine how many local firms has hired Sacramento residents as of this date?
1 1
REPLY
TAB
Author thumbnail
March 7, 2010 | 3:59 AM
No we don't need no entertainment center or sports complex, but i have tried talking to UP about a lousy new coat of paint for the I street bridge to no avail. UP sucks!!!!
0 0
REPLY
March 5, 2010 | 4:15 PM
Whether it is hundreds or thousands of jobs created....this is good news for the Sacramento region. Looking forward to the groundbreaking!
3 0
REPLY
edited on  March 5, 2010 | 7:16 PM
I agree with your post. The bad news is it isn't going to create thousands of jobs for Sacramento residents. The good news is it will create jobs. And that I too am looking forward to. Nothing is all bad and nothing is all good. Sometimes an organized lie can have more power than disorganized truth. If it is not going to bring thousands of jobs then it should state it will bring jobs (possibly hundreds for Sacramento residents) and we need to not rest until we get thousands of jobs for a city where the unemployment rate is skyrocketing and false hopes skyrocket as well.
2 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background