STORYLINE Sacramento City Hall / Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

City Council softens policy on leaks, confidentiality

by Kathleen Haley, published on February 23, 2010 at 10:15 PM

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

The Sacramento City Council has backed away from a proposed rule stating that city employees could be fired for leaking confidential information. Instead, the City Council approved a new policy Tuesday that would apply only to council members.

City Attorney Eileen Teichert wrote both proposals. The Feb. 2 version of the rule stated that an “employee disclosing or causing to be disclosed confidential information to any unauthorized person may be subject to appropriate disciplinary action up to and including termination.”

But the City Council decided Tuesday to restrict the scope of the policy to council members. Council members who leak confidential information can face punishment, according to the policy. The specific punishment is public censure, which is akin to a reprimand.

“Any council member disclosing or causing to be disclosed confidential information to any unauthorized person may be subject to public censure by the City Council,” the policy states.

Before a council member can be publicly reprimanded for leaking confidential information, several steps must be taken. The policy states that the council member in question must have been “provided with notice of the accusation and facts underlying such accusation, and an opportunity to be heard.”

Teichert said she received feedback from council members that they didn’t want to “squelch” employees’ rights to be whistleblowers. She did not specify how many council members asked for the proposed rule to be softened.

Councilwoman Sandy Sheedy has expressed her views on the original proposed rule publicly. She said at the Feb. 2 City Council meeting that the proposal would have a “chilling effect” on whistleblowers.

Councilman Robbie Waters in January started the council’s discussion on a confidentiality rule. At a Jan. 25 City Council meeting, Waters said he wanted Teichert to define the term “confidentiality” in legal terms. He asked Teichert to include moral and “punitive” information in her legal definition of the term.

The new policy that council members unanimously approved Tuesday will not be in the City Council's Rules of Procedure, Teichert said after the meeting. She described the new language on confidentiality as a policy, not a rule.

Photo by Anthony Bento.

Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

February 24, 2010 | 12:55 AM
Interesting. Would this restriction also apply to the mayor?
5 1
REPLY
February 24, 2010 | 8:44 AM
To William's point, what rules do "volunteers" working for a particular member of the 9 person city council fall under?
Is the interpretation to be one of any member of Council, or the staff and/or volunteers working for that council member's, going to result in substantiated violations being attributable to that council member?
7 0
REPLY
February 24, 2010 | 10:27 AM
Why do you two want to silence potential whistle blowers?
1 5
REPLY
February 24, 2010 | 6:08 PM
uh, tom...what are you talking about?
4 0
REPLY
February 24, 2010 | 12:28 PM
Hi Bill and Fifthgen,

I'm working on your questions and hope to get back to you with answers soon.

Cheers,

Kathleen
4 0
REPLY
February 24, 2010 | 2:56 PM
Hi Bill, City Clerk Shirley Concolino said that "the confidentiality policy applies to the mayor as he is one of the electeds."
5 0
REPLY
February 24, 2010 | 6:09 PM
Thank you for the follow-up--I echo Rhonda's sentiment. It's always frustrating to have an unanswered question in an article--getting an answer is nice.
5 0
REPLY
February 24, 2010 | 3:00 PM
HI Fifthgen,

Concolino suggested that the city attorney could answer your question. I will e-mail City Attorney Eileen Teichert right now.

Cheers,

Kathleen
4 0
REPLY
February 24, 2010 | 3:25 PM
I am really serious and there is no sarcasm intended in this comment--it is really nice of you to interact, look for and contact city individuals to provide the information / concerns of community members. Thank you for taking the time to do so.
5 1
REPLY
February 24, 2010 | 8:54 PM
Thanks Kathleen!!
2 0
REPLY
February 24, 2010 | 4:28 PM
Thanks, Rhonda. I appreciate your comment. Cheers, Kathleen
2 0
REPLY
edited on  February 24, 2010 | 7:17 PM
I think the city should institute a whistleblowers hotline. The state has had one for several years, arbited by a third party, and this has exposed many scandals, mismanagement of funds and cost overruns helping to save the state a lot of money and get at least a few bad apples out of the system.
5 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background