STORYLINE Sacramento City Hall / Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

Utilities director comments on rates, proposed ballot measure

by Kathleen Haley, published on February 11, 2010 at 6:04 PM

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images

Utilities Department Director Marty Hanneman said Thursday that a new ballot proposal would hurt the city’s ability to provide utilities services. The Sacramento Taxpayers League has proposed a ballot measure that aims to block a 9.2 percent city utilities rate increase.

Hanneman did not comment on the proposal Wednesday, saying through a spokeswoman that he had not yet read it. However, he sent a lengthy e-mailed response to The Sacramento Press Thursday.

Read Hanneman’s response to the ballot proposal below:

The Department of Utilities has the following response based upon an initial review of the proposed language. The City Attorney's Office and others are conducting additional reviews to determine what if any other impacts, including those to the General Fund there might be.

*We take how rate payer funds are used very seriously and we know and understand that rate increases are difficult for many in our community. However rate increases are necessary to sustain our current water, sewer, drainage and solid waste services.

*Just as our customers have noticed an increase in their everyday costs for electricity and fuel, we too have faced those burdens. Additionally, we face increased costs for chemicals, labor, and state and federally mandated programs, such as water meters, and compliance with our permits to operate our water, storm drainage and sewer systems.

*To date, the Department has cut 50 positions, among them were 38 lay-offs, most employees have taken furloughs, and the department has drastically cut discretionary spending.

*The Department's water and sewer funds have little to no operating reserve and the solid waste fund is actually negative. In recent years, fund reserves were used to offset rate increases and to cover increasing costs of service.

*A study commissioned by the City Council by Management Partners has concluded that the City's utility funds are woefully underfunded and that the City has significant infrastructure needs. Without significant increases, Management Partners reported to the City Council today that the Utility Funds and Infrastructure needs pose a "significant threat" to the General Fund.

*To keep rates static at today's rate and to limit future rate increases to CPI would mean drastic cuts to the Utilities services. It may result in:

--Remaining reserve funds being decimated.

--The capital improvement program that rehabilitates and replaces water, sewer, and drainage infrastructure facing severe cuts and possible disbandment. This will mean that infrastructure will be allowed to fail, customers would face impacts of being without water, sewer or drainage service as preventative rehabilitation or replacement work will not have occurred.

--Further reductions to garbage, recycling, and yard waste collection service to every other week or even monthly service.

--Additional layoffs of additional Utilities staff at various levels.


 

 

 

 

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

February 11, 2010 | 6:31 PM
Mr Hanneman...if the city utilities is short of funds, get from the folks you have been giving it to all these years.. the other city departments.

How you can with any integrity justify this increase, given that EVERY year your department received fee increases three and four times the rate of inflation is unbelievable!! All the time you either knew or should have known the city manager was siphoning the money to other departments. In either case, the only honorable thing for you to do is to resign.

If this ballot measure passes (and I suspect it will), you have only yourself and the rest of your manangement team to blame.

btw..how come you never cited the 'savings' from cutting services back to four days a week?? Perhaps all you were doing was giving your employees permanent three day weekends, with no reduction in pay or benefits?
2 1
REPLY
February 11, 2010 | 7:29 PM
Hanneman must think he can still fool all of the people all of the time... well the gig is up. That Grand Jury report has put an end to the department’s sneaky ways.
2 1
REPLY
February 12, 2010 | 9:02 AM
Good report. Perhaps future stories will include utilities rates for residences and businesses in other California cities.
3 0
REPLY
February 12, 2010 | 10:59 AM
Rates in similar size towns across America would be even better. We were shocked to learn our utility bills were double when we moved here.
2 0
REPLY
February 12, 2010 | 11:28 AM
The citizens of the City of Sacramento enjoy the best quality water on any city in California - and 11th in the nation. DOU also provides services to its citizens that people that live in unincorporated areas the region only dream up - pick up of abandoned property and street cleaning to name two. Hanneman was named Acting Director after the former directory suddenly retired under a cloud (on-going FBI investigations to name one problem and "missing" water meters). Since Hanneman took over, the water meters were found (it was a case of poor inventory records - and a new, improved process is now in place to ensure this doesn't happen again). Also, the Grand Jury last year commended Hanneman on the fine job he did in cleaning up the debit/credit card abuse. There are alot of problems in DOU, but the people there now are the ones who brought these issues forward and into the light so that they can be resolved. They are the ones trying to faciltitate the changes needed to provide a green, healthy, and safe comprehensive utilities program for Sacramento. Those who are looking for resignation - be careful what you ask for. Hanneman is a man of great itegrity - you may not get someone as fair and sensible as he has proven himself to be - not just with Utilities, but in all the City departments he as served.
1 2
REPLY
February 12, 2010 | 6:18 PM
These folks knowingly and illegally allowed the transfer of utility funds into the citiy's general coffers. If they were anywhere other than in city government, they would all be facing criminal charges.

Your argument is as credible as the lifer prisoner who expects forgiveness because he found 'god' in prison. These crooks are fighting for their own dear skins to stay out of jail. That is all.
1 0
REPLY
February 12, 2010 | 6:34 PM
I see no evidence of good city trash service when walking through the ally's of Sacramento, they are full of illegal dumping, that sits there, and sits there.
0 0
REPLY
February 18, 2010 | 10:09 AM
Rhys02 - Prop 218 was voted in around 1996. The City did not change how it billed inter-departmentally when 218 was enacted - that is the problem. The money was used for other City services - if that's what you're referring to as "illegal". How many years do you think someone should get for watering a city park? Hanneman did not take over until 2008 when he and the City Manager learned of the 218 issues as well as the other major problems (via an audit) in DOU. Although Hanneman was the Assistant City Manager with responsibility for DOU among other City departments, only the City Manager was authorized to reprimand or fire the then DOU director G. Reents. Reents "retired" a few months later - but he's been very busy attending City Council meetings and providing half-truths to those who will listen.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background