STORYLINE Sacramento City Hall / Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

A local group that watches public funds hopes to take its complaints over utilities rates to the polls.  The Sacramento County Taxpayers League's new ballot proposal seeks to stop a 9.2 percent city utilities rate increase scheduled to start in July. 

The proposal follows a Jan. 6 grand jury report saying that the city’s use of utilities funds may conflict with Proposition 218, a state law that dictates how city funds should be used. 

The grand jury report claims that money collected from residents' utility bills may have been used to fund other municipal programs. Prop. 218 states that cities can use funds from utilities bills in one way: to cover the costs of delivering utilities services, according to the report.

The league partnered with the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association in January to sue the city over the Prop. 218 issue.

“What we have is a department that is utterly out of control and is getting worse by the day,” Craig Powell, chairman of the league's initiative campaign, told The Sacramento Press Wednesday.
 
The group argues that city residents have faced utilities rates that have been 321 percent higher than the inflation rate over the last nine years.

The league wants to put its “Utilities Rate Hike Rollback Initiative” on the November ballot. In order for the initiative to be certified for the ballot, the group must collect 5,420 signatures of city voters. Powell said the group will use volunteers to collect the signatures.

In addition to halting the 9.2 percent rate increase, the measure would require the city to tie its annual utilities rate increases to the Consumer Price Index, Powell said. 

The City Council last June raised rates 9 percent for the 2009/2010 fiscal year. It also decided at that time to approve the 9.2 increase for the 2010/2011 fiscal year. 

In June, the Utilities Department said it was experiencing budget woes because of the recession, increased operating costs and new regulatory and environmental requirements. The department also said in June that rates were not raised in the 2008/2009 fiscal year.
 
Utilities Department spokeswoman Jessica Hess said she and department director Marty Hanneman could not comment on the proposed initiative because they had not seen it.

However, Hess said the City Council will consider a budget presentation in a special meeting Thursday. The presentation includes the analysis from Management Partners Incorporated, a firm with offices in San Jose and Cincinnati, Ohio.

The analysis states that funding for the Utilities Department is “at seriously low levels.” If rate hikes are not made, the department will see “negative fund balances," according to the firm. 


Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

February 11, 2010 | 10:03 AM
Where can we sign the petition?
1 0
REPLY
February 11, 2010 | 3:32 PM
We don't need another voter passed initiative that handcuffs local government's ability to provide needed services. Tying utilities rate increases to the Consumer Price Index has no rational. The CPI has little relationship to the price of fuel or to the cost of providing safe, clean water. There is clear evidence that there are major problems with the management of city services but what we need is public disclosure of how fees for services are being spent and accountability.
0 3
REPLY
February 11, 2010 | 5:15 PM
...."voter passed initiative that handcuffs local government's...." That is EXACTLY what we need. The government is of service to me. It exist at my pleasure.
2 0
REPLY
February 11, 2010 | 6:52 PM
The CPI increases allow expenditures for utilities services to keep pace with inflation while keeping utilities rates within our ability to pay, a novel concept that seems to have been largely ignored by the city in recent years. I think just about everybody realizes that the Department of Utilities is in dire need of a "fiscal diet" to impose some discipline and accountability over their out-of-control (and sometimes illegal) expenditures. People are seriously hurting out there and they cannot afford to keep paying whatever sky high rate hikes the city council chooses to impose each year. If the city thinks it needs a rate hike higher than increases in the CPI, all they have to do under this initiative is make the case to the voters that a jumbo rate hike is justified. I trust the voters to make decisions on jumbo rate hikes far more than I trust the city council, as its sorry record of jacking up utilities rates over the past 9 years pretty clearly demonstrates.
0 0
REPLY
February 11, 2010 | 7:06 PM
You can obtain a petition by e-mailing your request to RollbackUtilitiesRates@gmail.com. The petitions will be available on and after March 2nd. The city needs the time to prepare a ballot summary.
0 0
REPLY
February 11, 2010 | 7:49 PM
Excellent!

The City Utilities are out of control.
Water meter scandal, Green waste bins forced on us.
Somebody fire someone already!

Take back those freakin' green waste bins too.
2 0
REPLY
February 11, 2010 | 8:11 PM
CPI increases does not necessarily allow expenditures for utilities services to keep pace with inflation. For example, the fuel component of the CPI is only 5 or 6 percent. The price of fuel could double or triple and have only a minimal effect on the CPI. Under that circumstance how would the city fuel the garbage trucks I think you all want to pick up your garbage.
0 2
REPLY
May 5, 2010 | 10:58 AM
Allan,
The proponents of this measure claim that 3/4 of the city utility budget is wages and benefits. If true, this means 25% is everything else.... trucks, equipment, insurance, fuel etc.

Without seeing an expense breakdown from the utilities department, it certainly seems within reason that the utility department's fuel spending is around the same the percentage as the CPI.

if the most of the utility department spending is on wages and benefits, and their spending is increasing many times faster than inflation, then obviously wages and benefits is probably the first place to cut the fat.
0 0
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below. Use commas to separate your tags.

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background