STORYLINE Sacramento City Hall / Politics

This storyline has only one article

Viewing thru of

Close timeline

No high resolution image exists...

Progress bar

Loading images
Slideshow image

While the strong mayor initiative is in the midst of a court battle, a second measure from the group that wrote the strong mayor proposal is much less controversial.

At its Tuesday meeting, the City Council supported a proposal to create an independent budget analyst’s office.

Councilman Steve Cohn said he thinks the council members “all agree there’s a need” for an independent budget analyst.

The budget analyst proposal is separate from the strong mayor initiative, but both plans were written by the Sacramentans for Accountable Government (SAG) group.

Council members asked staff to bring back a resolution so the council could vote to put the measure on the June ballot.

The council also wants to weigh in on the details of the office’s budget and staffing.

So, council members decided to simultaneously prepare SAG’s proposal for the ballot and to discuss the kind of budget analyst’s office they want to create. This means two separate plans could emerge: the SAG proposal and a possible City Council plan that could be crafted later this month.

The council was mandated to approve the SAG proposal as an ordinance or put it on the ballot, according to a report prepared by Matthew Ruyak in the city attorney’s office. That’s because the Sacramento County Registrar of Voters certified signatures from residents who backed the proposal, and the City Council signed off on registrar’s certification, according to the report.

Residents signed petitions to put both the strong mayor initiative and the independent budget analyst’s office on an upcoming ballot.

In the strong mayor form of government outlined in the initiative, Sacramento’s mayor would have many additional responsibilities. The mayor would assume the duties of the city manager and create the city budget.

Thomas Hiltachk, who wrote the strong mayor initiative, is appealing a recent Sacramento Superior Court decision that said the initiative broke state law and could not go on the June ballot. The case is at the 3rd District Court of Appeal.

Photo by Anthony Bento.

Kathleen Haley is a staff reporter for The Sacramento Press.

Liked this article? Share it with your friends:

Conversation Express your views, debate, and be heard with those in your area closest to the issue.RSS Feed

February 3, 2010 | 8:14 AM
The city currently has competent people overseeing its financial affairs, unlike the Utilities or Development Departments. There is no need for an 'independent budget analyst', a la the State's legislative process, and this is merely just another of KJ's ploys suggested via the SMI to stack budgetary authority in his favor in a near dictatorial reengineering of city governance...

In the end we're going to have checkers checking the checked with far too many layers of unnecessary and mind-numbing redundant oversight... at a time when this city can ill-afford to do so, for merely the ego of a profoundly unfit mayor...

KJ ran his own organizations into the ground -- and now he's doing to this city what he did for his own firms and nonprofits...

If there is any justice, he needs to be recalled....
3 2
REPLY
Leave a Comment
User icon
Type your comment in the box below Edit your comment in the box below

Type tags into the box below.
Use commas to separate your tags.

Cancel Submit

Please Log in or Sign up

Existing Members

Sign In Progress bar Forgot Password?

New Users Create an Account Here
Progress bar
Verification email has been sent. To validate your account open the link provided in the message.
There was a problem sending your verification email. Please contact support@sacramentopress.com
Progress bar Login background Tag cloud top Tag cloud background Tag cloud bottom Login manager background